Start Here

Values

Buying & Selling

Rare U.S. Coins

How To's

Myths & History

Have Error Coins? How To Tell A Normal Coin OR An Altered Coin From A Real Coin Error

by Joshua McMorrow-Hernandez

Error coins are something that a lot of readers ask about in the comments section.

I’ve seen many people post photos of real error coins that they’ve found in their spare change. And it’s always exciting for me to tell them that they’ve found a rare, valuable, or unique coin error!

Many times, though, I have the unfortunate duty to tell some readers that their “error” coins are really just damaged, or altered, or simply normal coins with an unusual wear pattern.

I’m going to share with you some of the most common types of error coins people ask me about (coins that people often think are errors) so you can find out if you indeed have a real coin error… or not.

Before we get to the nitty gritty coin-by-coin overview, here’s a video I made to help you tell doubled dies & error coins apart from altered coins & novelty coins:

Examples Of Legit U.S. Mint Error Coins

Here are 3 common types of error coins that came from U.S. Mint facilities:

#1 – 1990 No-S Lincoln Penny Error

This is one of the most common coin errors people ask me about.

They found a 1990 penny without a mintmark and, understandably, think they have one of the 200 or so 1990 no-S Lincoln cents worth between $1,500 and $3,000.

However, the 1990 No-S Lincoln Memorial penny is a die variety that’s unique only to proof Lincoln cents from that year!

99.9 percent of the 1990 Lincoln pennies with no “S” mintmark are actually regular 1990 pennies made at the Philadelphia Mint — which struck more than 6 billion Lincoln cents that year.

Here’s a 1990 No-S error penny from a proof set:

And here’s a 1990 penny from the Philadelphia Mint:

I bet you can pretty quickly tell the difference between the two coins!

The 1990 No-S penny error has:

  • Shiny, mirror-like fields
  • Frosty devices
  • Squared-off, wire-like rims
  • Sharp details throughout

If you have a 1990 penny that looks like the bottom coin, it’s worth face value.

Learn more about the 1990 No-S penny error.

#2 – Doubled Die Error Coins

A lot of people post photos of coins that they think are doubled dies. Some of them are, but most of them aren’t.

Determining a doubled die coin from one that isn’t is rather difficult. You see, every doubled die coin has its own diagnostics (things that a coin collector will look for to ensure whether or not a coin is in fact a doubled die).

To understand what makes a doubled die, you need to first understand that a doubled die coin isn’t a coin that was struck twice. Rather, it’s a coin struck by a die on which part of its design was doubled. Here’s how it works:

  • The die is imprinted by a machine called a hub.
  • When the hub creates a secondary, misaligned image on the coin, that’s when a doubled die coin is created.
  • This doubled die will then strike out potentially hundreds, even thousands, of doubled die coins — such is the case with the 1955 doubled die penny. Some coin analysts think 20,000 of these 1955 doubled die pennies were made.

Machine doubling occurs when the die that strikes a coin reverberates off the coin twice (or more times). This usually creates a stair-like secondary image of some or all of the details on a coin.

  • Here’s a video of a guy who found a machine doubled 1969-S penny: watch short video.
  • Here’s a real 1969-S doubled die penny (you’ll note the doubling is extraordinarily clear and matches the appearance of the original strike): watch short video.

Learn more about doubled die coins and their values.

#3 – Bubbled Coin Errors

Have you found any coins with bubbles in them? I’ve found coins like this, and so have many readers here at the US Coins Guide.

These bubbled coins are usually dimes or quarters, but they might also be half dollars or one dollar coins. In virtually all cases, the bubble coins were made since 1965.

What’s going on? What’s a coin with a bubble worth?

  • When a copper-nickel clad coin is exposed to extreme heat (such as fire), the layers of metal cladding begin to expand and separate — thus causing the bubbles. Such coins are worth face value.
  • On post-1981 zinc Lincoln cents (so-called Zincoln pennies), tiny bubbles are called plating blisters. They’re caused by inconsistent adherence of the copper plating to the zinc-based inner core; this was an epidemic issue especially during the first few years of zinc Lincoln cent production. These plating bubbles are generally not worth anything — unless the bubbles are particularly large or numerous.

Learn more about the value of coins with bubbles.

Examples Of Normal U.S. Coins That Have Been Altered

Here are examples of 6 otherwise normal U.S. coins that have been altered in some way:

1) Two-Headed Coins

A Washington quarter with 2 heads — 1 dated 1986, the other 1993.

A Lincoln penny with 2 heads — and 2 different dates.

I’ve gotten so many questions about coins like these. (Apparently, there are a lot of altered coins out there!)

And that’s just it… Virtually any two-headed coin you’ll find is altered.

Two heads might be better than one, but on coins two heads are usually altered pieces made outside of the Mint.

While almost anything is possible (given the mechanics of how modern-day coins are produced), it’s virtually impossible that a two-headed coin can be made.

If you see any coin that has two heads but different dates on either side of the coin, you can automatically rule it out as a magician’s coin. Such coins have no numismatic value.

2) Colorized Coins

Red coins, orange coins, purple coins, blue. I’ve seen many of these, how about you?

This isn't a colorized coin. Rather it's a proof silver American Eagle coin that's reflecting the colors of the photographer's tie-dye shirt!

Sorry — I’m a writer, but I’m not the best poet.

What is true is this: people are always asking me about colorized coins and what their values are.

The answer: these aren’t error coins. And if they’re U.S. coins, they’re usually worth either face value or bullion melt value.

Until 2020, the U.S. Mint didn’t make colored coins, and the relatively few types of colorized coins made by them since are commemorative coins not issued for circulation. In fact, any colorized U.S. coins that you see dated before 2020 have been altered by somebody outside of the Mint.

  • Sometimes, the post-Mint colorized additions are rather artful — such as the painted American Silver Eagles that one infomercial pitched on TV several years ago.

At any rate, these coins might catch the eye, but unless they are one of the very few commemorative coins colorized by the U.S. Mint they aren’t numismatically valuable.

An important note about colorized coins: Some nations (including Canada) do have issued colored coins. These are generally common and some have been issued for circulation — meaning such pieces are often worth face value if worn.

3) Gold-Plated Coins

A lot of people want to know what their “rare” gold penny is worth. Unfortunately, it’s worth just a penny.

Many people have posted photos of gold-plated coins that they “heard” were rare, one-of-a-kind, or some type of mistake.

I’ve even found some gold-plated coins in my pocket change.

This gold Bicentennial quarter (right) sits next to a regular 50 States Quarter.

While these coins make great keepsakes, they are not rare and they certainly weren’t made by the U.S. Mint.

These gold coins are ordinary U.S. Mint coins that private individuals (or, sometimes, novelty coin companies) alter with a layer of gold plating.

You’d think a gold-plated coin would be worth a bundle. After all, it’s covered with gold, right?

Amazingly, most gold-plated coins contain no more than 2 or 3 cents’ worth of the yellow metal. In essence, the coin is worth face value. If you’re lucky, you may find a coin dealer willing to pay a few cents over face value — as sometimes these coins sell well as novelty pieces.

4) Small Coins & Large Coins

I’ve come across a lot of people who tell me they found a tiny Lincoln cent, a gigantic Indian Head penny, or some other common coin of quite uncommon size.

Here I hold a large Indian Head penny replica against a regular-sized Indian Head cent.

What are these?

They’re replica tokens. And some of them are actually quite convincing — if not for their size, that is.

These artful reproductions are normally sold at tourist gift shops, toy stores, and other novelty establishments.

While they don’t have any numismatic value, they are collectible as exonumia, and some of these tiny coins and large coins are worth $1 or so.

5) Coins With Odd Rims & Edges

A common question I’m asked is whether or not a coin that has an usually tall or thick rim is an error coin.

The answer I give if the reader doesn’t submit a photo of the coin is that, yes, it’s possible the coin is an error. Broadstrike errors and die cap errors are common examples of legit error coins with odd-looking rims.

However, usually the coins I receive pictures of look something like this:

This is an example of a coin whose edge was pushed or rolled inward due to centrifugal force. Most likely the coin was spun in a machine — quite possibly a clothes dryer.

These aren’t error coins, and they aren’t rare. From the numismatic perspective, such coins are regarded as damaged.

The value for an Indian Head penny such as this might be 10 or 20 cents because the coin is so old. But more recent coins may not even be redeemable for face value.

6) Dimes & Quarters Without Edge Grooves

A few readers have submitted photos of dimes and quarters with smooth edges.

An old dime with patina.

Of course, as you may know, dimes and quarters are supposed to have edge reeding — those tiny, raised lines on the edges of some coins. Reeded edges are supposed to make coins easier to grab and allow blind people to more easily differentiate coins.

Back when dimes, quarters, half dollars, and dollar coins were made from silver, edge reeding also helped to deter silver bugs from shaving bits of precious metal off the coin. (If the edge was shaved off, the damaged edge would show it and the coin would not be accepted for change.)

Many want to know if dimes and quarters without the reeded edge is some type of error.

The basic answer is “no.” Really old dimes and quarters (ones that have been circulating for a good 40 or 50 years) tend to lose their reeded edges due to wear over time:

  • Think of all the hands, transactions, and vending machines an old dime or quarter will have seen after 4 or 5 decades.
  • Years of handling wears down the edges of these coins, and thus they often have smooth edges.
  • Sometimes, dimes and quarters (and other coins with reeded edges) lose their grooves due to being tossed around on their edges in a laundry dryer.

In all of the above cases, these coins are worth face value.

Here’s what to do if you think you have a legit U.S. mint error coin!

Like this post? Save it to read again later… or share with others on Pinterest!

PUBLISHED August 6, 2026
UPDATED August 18, 2026

Joshua McMorrow-Hernandez

Numismatic Specialist

Hi, I’m Josh! I’m the Editor here at the US Coins Guide. My love for coins began when I was 11 years old. I primarily collect and study U.S. coins produced during the 20th century.

I’m a member of the American Numismatic Association (ANA) and the Numismatic Literary Guild (NLG). I have won multiple awards from the NLG for my work as a coin journalist. I’m also the editor at the Florida United Numismatists Club (FUN Topics magazine), and author of Images of America: The United States Mint in Philadelphia (a book that explores the colorful history of the Philadelphia Mint). I’ve contributed hundreds of articles for various coin publications including COINage, The Numismatist, Numismatic News, Coin Dealer Newsletter, Coin Values, and CoinWeek.

I’ve authored over 1,000 articles here at the US Coins Guide (many with over 50K shares).

I welcome your coin questions!

849 responses to “Have Error Coins? How To Tell A Normal Coin OR An Altered Coin From A Real Coin Error”

  1. Harley Gentry Avatar
    Harley Gentry

    Hey Josh,

    Is there anyway I could contact you by email? I need to ask you something about coins but I also need to post a picture. Every time I bring up the camera, it says that an error occurred and the webpage reloaded. 🙁 Can I please see your email?

    I’d appreciate it. 🙂

    Sincerely,
    Harley Gentry

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Harley —

      I will send a message to you via the email address you use for logging in here.

      Best,
      Josh

  2. Steven Sacks Avatar
    Steven Sacks

    any thoughts on these ones?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Steven —

      Nice off-center and clip errors! Though fairly common for their error type, these are still worth in the range of $5 to $8 each.

      Great finds!
      Josh

      1. Steven Sacks Avatar
        Steven Sacks

        thanks for that assessment josh!
        i was also wondering if you can offer me any insight on these larger pennies from the 1800’s…

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Steven —

          This is a nice collection of Early American coppers. These Braided Hair and Matron Head large cents are common and it appears most of them have some degree of discoloration and/or porosity, but they are nonetheless collectible and well worth hanging onto.

          If I had to put a dollar value on the group, I’d say a coin dealer would probably offer somewhere in the neighborhood of $30 to $50, based on how well the pieces grade; I tried to enlarge the photo to get a better idea on individual grades, but to no avail.

          I hope this helps,
          Josh

  3. Vivian Avatar
    Vivian

    Hi! I’ve been sorting through my piggy bank this week and I have two nickels that are interesting but I can’t find any information on either. One is a 1960-D nickel that seems to have a circle on reverse side and the other is a 2013-P with a semi circle under In God We Trust. Any help and guidance is welcomed! THANK YOU! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b8bf7e5cc693067c878679a6c774197f44b2b6a947c5d3b678e0ddf16db1dd0c.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b454f7bd60367d306d64130bc0a4ea6764f28df10348854dc393821ec811aac1.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Vivian —

      The circle 1960-D nickel is a post-mint damage impression likely caused by damage in a vending machine. However, the 2013 nickel appears to be a light die clash; that’s a mint-caused matter. However, such die clashes are common and in this case wouldn’t really add any monetary value to the coin.

      I hope this answers some questions for you!
      Josh

  4. Juan Ugaz Avatar
    Juan Ugaz

    What about this 1960 penny
    Look at number 6

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      HI, Juan —

      That’s a pretty penny indeed. It appears to have minimal wear and has nice color. It would take magnification and looking at the coin from different angles to determine if it does have any wear. If this piece is uncirculated, I’d say its worth at least 25 to 50 cents. Possibly more if the surfaces check out with minimal contact marks under 5x magnification and the coin is absent any wear.

      Best,
      Josh

      1. Juan Ugaz Avatar
        Juan Ugaz

        Thank you so much Josh!!!

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re welcome, Juan!

  5. Juan Ugaz Avatar
    Juan Ugaz

    Number6

  6. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
    JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

    Hi, Ben —

    Closely looking at the area where the “1” SHOULD be, I see what looks like a deep gouge there, which suggests the digit was literally shoved aside as a result of post-mint damage.

    Best,
    Josh

  7. Juan Ugaz Avatar
    Juan Ugaz

    Look at this 1982 penny … What do you think?

    1. Juan Ugaz Avatar
      Juan Ugaz

      The one in the left… Is still shinning and all the coin looks like difuse

    2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Juan —

      Very interesting. It looks like the piece on the left was weakly struck. It also seems like there is quite a bit of bubbling on that coin, indicative that it must be a copper-coated zinc cent. I would hang on that coin; I believe the obverse bubbling alone would warrant a small premium as some collectors do place a value on zinc cents with heavy bubbling. By “small premium,” I’m suggesting something in the neighborhood of $1 to $2 perhaps. The price is vague as that market is not really solid and varies more on the collectors’ individual tastes.

      Neat find!
      Josh

      1. Juan Ugaz Avatar
        Juan Ugaz

        Thank u so much again Josh!

  8. Tashi Dhondup Avatar
    Tashi Dhondup

    Hello.. i got 5 cent coin 1987 of Jefferson with p mark .. the coin observe and reverse are upside down …is it a real,fake or a error coin . And if its real is there any value of it..

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tashi —

      If you mean that the picture of Monticello on the reverse appears upside down when the head of Jefferson is looking upright, that is normal. If, on the other hand, you mean both designs are oriented the same direction, it is most likely an altered coin — especially given that such extreme rotational errors are virtually impossible with modern coining technology.

      I hope this clears things up!
      Josh

      1. Tashi Dhondup Avatar
        Tashi Dhondup

        Thank you for the information..

  9. moses chavira Avatar
    moses chavira

    Can scan anyone tell me if this is an error 1977 dime?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Moses —

      This dime certainly appears unusual. I’m trying to check out the details on the reverse concerning that band. I want to see if that is a strike-through/strike anomaly error or something added post-mint. Checking the dime’s weight would help. It should weigh 2.27 grams. Anything significantly more, and that band could be a post-mint addition. I think the coin needs an in-person inspection, and I recommend you either swing by a coin dealer or have the coin certified.

      Here is more info on where to find coin dealers near you: https://png.memberclicks.net/find-a-png-dealer
      And here is insight on the various third-party coin grading firms: https://uscoinsguide.com/slabbed_coins/

      Good luck,
      Josh

  10. Juan Ugaz Avatar
    Juan Ugaz

    What about this 1975 penny? Looks like silver

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Juan —

      Checking its weight is particularly helpful. If it weighs significantly more — or less — than 3.11 grams, it is may be an off-metal error. From the photo, however, it appears the 1975-D cent on the left was chemically altered, and quite possible harshly cleaned, giving it a lighter appearance.

      I hope this helps,
      Josh

      1. Juan Ugaz Avatar
        Juan Ugaz

        Hello Josh! I just got an scale… Its weight is 3.10… What do you think?

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Juan —

          That’s great info – that confirms my early thought that the coin has been cleaned or chemically altered and is otherwise a “normal” 1975-D cent. Feel free to spend it or, if you’re inclined, keep it — the value of these pre-1982 bronze pennies is about 2 cents due to their intrinsic copper value.

          Best,
          Josh

  11. Jenika Hancock Avatar
    Jenika Hancock

    I found this in my change last year and was wondering if it was an error coin or not?

  12. Jenika Hancock Avatar
    Jenika Hancock

    Found this in my change is it a true error or a not? Been trying to find out for a year now and finally found this site

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jenika —

      From the photo it looks like a possible error indeed. Is that line on the reverse image raised or sunken?

      I suggest you submit this coin for certification. Here is some more information on reputable coin grading companies: https://uscoinsguide.com/slabbed_coins/

      Good luck,
      Josh

      1. Jenika Hancock Avatar
        Jenika Hancock

        The reverse side appears raised I am sending what I hope are some better on quality…thank you so much for your help this far Josh

    2. Jenika Hancock Avatar
      Jenika Hancock

      The reverse side appears raised I am sending what I hope are some better on quality…thank you so much for your help this far Josh!

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Jenika

        While there is a possibility this is post-mint damage, I’m leaning toward it being some type of die issue, although if so there are a few various culprits. If you are so inclined, I would submit it to a third-party coin grading company for a professional, in-hand evaluation.

        This article contains more info on some of the major reputable players in the coin-grading industry: https://uscoinsguide.com/slabbed_coins/

        Normally, it costs between $15 and $30 for third-party certification, but what those services do is attribute the problem/error and place the coin in a tamper-evident holder. If this is an error, I suspect it could possibly sell for a sum of money that would make certification worth the investment.

        You might also consider taking the coin to a local coin dealer for further in-hand inspection. Here is a searchable list of good coin dealers near you: https://png.memberclicks.net/find-a-png-dealer

        And more information on how to find a coin dealer: https://uscoinsguide.com/coin_dealer/

        This is a very unusual coin indeed and I hope for your sake it is a mint error. I suspect based on the appearance of several diagnostics (the raised bar, the shape of the edge/rim, lettering/devices, etc.) it is. Fingers crossed!

        Good luck,
        Josh

        1. Jenika Hancock Avatar
          Jenika Hancock

          Thank you Josh 🙂 I will let you know more about my coin once I find out more on it. I really appreciate all of the help this far on it.

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            My pleasure, Jenika!

  13. Juan Ugaz Avatar
    Juan Ugaz

    Joshua my friend! I found this 1945 d penny. What do you think?

    1. Juan Ugaz Avatar
      Juan Ugaz

      Another pic

  14. Joe Moravec Avatar
    Joe Moravec

    Hi josh! I recently inherited quite a substantial coin collection from my great grandfather and a 1964 penny was sealed in a case. It looks obviously an error. Here’s the pictures! And help would be appreciated. It has the head indent on the reverse side.

  15. tammy atwood Avatar
    tammy atwood

    hi i was wondering if you could tell me if the s and t in trust is an error in this 1967 penny or not

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      It appears the aberrations in the “S” and “T” are due to post-mint damage. Still, your 1967 Lincoln cent is worth 2 cents for its copper value.

      Thank you for your question and coin photo,
      Josh

    2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      I’m afraid the “S” and “T” appear to have been damaged outside of the Mint. However, your coin is still worth 2 cents for its copper value.

      Thank you for the question and the photo of your coin!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, David —

      THe 1955 Lincoln cent looks normal and is worth about 5 cents, but the 1960-D definitely appears to have a repunched mintmark. I believe that particular variety is worth about $10, possibly more.

      Best,
      Josh

  16. Phineas Avatar
    Phineas

    I was wondering about this dime that has raised edges of about a millimeter on both sides and has a no edge reeding

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Phineas —

      It appears this dime was subjected to post mint damage, perhaps most likely high centrifugal force by rolling inside something like a clothes dryer. This piece is worth face value.

      Best,
      Josh

  17. Cathy George Avatar
    Cathy George

    Hi guys, I am not sure what to think of this quarter? It’s smooth on both sides. I was wondering if this was a minted error or if someone damaged it post-mint? The ridges aren’t rough at all, and Washington looks worn but the other side is not worn at all? What do you think? There is no date and the “In” and the “Tr”is not seen either. Any info would be appreciated.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Cathy —

      Unfortunately the photo gets blurry as I zoom in to check out the details, so I am not able to check out the lettering and edge details for error diagnostics. However, it looks like the obverse (head’s side) was significantly damaged outside of the U.S. Mint and I think a very sharp implement, quite possibly a knife, was involved in altering the surface of this quarter.

      Without being able to check out the photo at a greater level of detail, what I can tell at this point is that it appears to be an altered coin worth face value. Please feel free to resubmit photos at higher resolution and I’ll gladly check them out.

      Best,
      Josh

      1. Chantily Avatar
        Chantily

        I have a dime size coin with a quarter design on it…front and back. I know it’s not a dime. And usually when a “Copy stamp” is applied it’s on the back. Yet it is in the front. Shold I just chuck it? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4e1f2264a336c4d5fdc5487b23fcf4300f3fcd7f03b4b5ff3f037da516831eb3.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d0d0c95cf33bffdc9e84afe49ae8939620cae7bc5911b549fa50fd7c52dbb6fd.jpg

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Chantily —

          Yes, this is a micro-sized quarter replica. Sometimes these pieces are worth a few cents as novelty collectibles.

          Best,
          Josh

  18. Paul G. Avatar
    Paul G.

    I found this penny in pocket change yesterday. I like error coins but there are so many errors on this penny that I had to ask. What do you call the error when the shape looks like this? (See picture)

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Paul —

      It looks like this coin was ground down by somebody — perhaps it was rubbed aggressively against concrete. The lines across the the faces of the coin are other tip-offs that this coin has suffered extreme post-mint damage.

      This piece is, at best, worth face value. I hope this provides you some insight on the coin…

      Thank you for your question and helpful photos!
      Josh

  19. disqus_XLQFonRAMc Avatar
    disqus_XLQFonRAMc

    I have a 1968 quarter that weighs only 4.6 grams, and isn’t as thick as it should be. Does this mean it was made with the wrong metal?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi,

      I’ll need a photo of the coin to help determine what’s going on, please.

      Thank you!
      Josh

      1. disqus_XLQFonRAMc Avatar
        disqus_XLQFonRAMc

        also it sounds like silver in a handful of other change… That’s what caught my attention

  20. disqus_XLQFonRAMc Avatar
    disqus_XLQFonRAMc

    Here are the pictures

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi —

      It looks like your 1968 quarter is heavily corroded, thus contributing to the lower weight. It is worth face value!

      Best,
      Josh

  21. disqus_XLQFonRAMc Avatar
    disqus_XLQFonRAMc

    Also a couple odd pennies thanks for your time

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, XLQ —

      Here are my opinions about the state of your coins:

      1912 (?) Lincoln cent — I see signs of corrosion and rim hit at the 10 o’ clock position. This piece is worth approximately 25 cents.

      1942 — I see a post-mint gash across Lincoln’s neck, which would reduce the value of this coin to about 3 to 5 cents.

      1957-D — While this coin may have a lamination error ($5 or more in value), I also see signs that is has been attacked by some type of acid, causing the porous surfaces. This coin might need an in-hand inspection to confirm whether or not the gash is due to a lamination error or a chemical.

      The other Lincoln wheat cent with a gash near the right wheat stalk has post-mint damage; without knowing its date I can’t really say what the coin is worth.

      Best,
      Josh

  22. David Neilson Avatar
    David Neilson

    Hello. I have this 1983 is it a D over D https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e33f417c9035170574a2aed28938b499c4f170d1920a44deef5ba59260187a22.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/289f16f4397e514b8e980bbdde5a4a8f33b8dc68027be65570dedc4bf6d8c08a.jpg
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4652928b038649e2cb6e9dcecdcafabd9b6c2a3c273aff8f047f433c7edde8b9.jpg e 1983-D it look to be maybe some doubling on the M/M it can be seen with a coinloop but maybe its machine doubling could you look at this and with your zoom lens to see if there’s anything there thank you so much

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, David —

      I do see what appears to be the coin’s inner zinc core exposed on the side of the mintmark; I am looking for signs of this being a repunched mintmark or possible doubled die and don’t think I see anything there but I might be off with this one because of the appearance of the zinc. I suggest this coin be examined by renowned die variety expert John Wexler for confirmation. Here’s a link to his site: https://doubleddie.com/1801.html

      Best,
      Josh

  23. David Neilson Avatar
    David Neilson

    Hello Josh I would like to look at these two pennies and maybe at the mint marks and see if there’s Dublin on them for me would you please sir and as always thank you

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, David —

      Based on the photos, I don’t see any doubling on these coins. Keep looking!

      Good luck,
      Josh

      1. David Neilson Avatar
        David Neilson

        You know I will keep looking , It’s in me. An some day I mite or mite not . But coin collecting is something I enjoy so until next time 1# https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6febcf813b1330aec246edcc9fc8148b109092a5802b539004a695899bc34b80.jpg fan thanks

  24. David Neilson Avatar
    David Neilson

    Hello again. .I ve been looking at these’s two 1983 Im not sure if my evaluation is correct and I thought I would ask you guys the one looks like it has a crack guy runs from the word one up to the steps to the third and fourth pillars out to the first roots back to the letter i in the world United the second looks like a double die but I could be wrong I thought I’d ask you thank you very much number one fan

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, David —

      I definitely see the die crack on the second piece (the reverse die crack; runs from Lincoln Memorial to “UNITED.” Such die cracks are usually worth at least $3 to $5.

      Thanks for your question and photos!
      Josh

      1. David Neilson Avatar
        David Neilson

        Thanks I though it was .what caught my eye was the or the lines between the third an forth pillers . Thank again .

  25. Melissa Corradi Avatar
    Melissa Corradi

    Hi Joshua, I’ve been keeping coins that I’ve thought were unique and I figured I’d ask if they are anything special (or even real!).
    The first one has a raised edge on the face and the other side shows a “silver” color and the rim is the same color.
    The second photo appears to be off center just a little bit.
    The third one is what I’m thinking isn’t real but thought I’d ask. It’s pretty cool regardless.
    Thanks in advance!!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Melissa!

      Great questions and great photos! Here’s what’s going on with each of these coins:

      •The 2002 Lincoln cent — There appears to be some minor machine doubling on the obverse, and on the reverse, heavy wear has exposed the coin’s zinc core. It’s worth face value, but a piece I’d hang onto anyway.

      •The 1972 Lincoln cent — It’s about 5% off center. That’s not quite the threshold where extra value starts kicking in (that’s closer to the 10-20% range), but nevertheless an error and interesting to keep.

      •The Case of the Missing Lincoln: The Lincoln cent without the Lincoln (AKA, missing obverse) is what illusionists call a gaffe coin. It’s designed for accommodating a smaller coin, such as a Roosevelt dime. This allows the magician to use sleight-of-hand techniques to make his or her audience to think he or she just turned a Lincoln cent into another coin – or vice versa. This piece has no numismatic value but may be worth a couple dollars to an illusionist or to those who collect novelty coins.

      Neat coins!
      Josh

      1. Melissa Corradi Avatar
        Melissa Corradi

        That is all really neat information! I have a whole box of coins I could keep you interested in, lol. Probably none worth anything. I had the pleasure of working in a bank years ago and they had a coin counting machine. We were allowed to keep anything the machine rejected and the owner left behind so I acquired quite a collection that way. Just a fun pastime of mine that I enjoy. My pile of steel pennies and wheat heads (no VDB’s, lol). Just fun stuff

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hello, Melissa!

          This is a really cool collection of coins! You’ve found some really great coins, such as the proof 40% silver Kennedy half dollars, the Indian Head cent, Buffalo nickel, Standing Liberty quarter, etc. What’s really special about this is that these were acquired through circulation finds, which means in addition to the numismatic value these pieces have, they also have a story.

          While most of the pieces I see are worth under $5 to $8, I do see a few interesting errors on the right side of the third image (the big group shot) that may be worth significantly more. I tried to blow up the image larger but can’t quite get good clarity well enough to see what the errors may be or ascertain their possible numismatic value.

          Thank you so much for sharing this with us here!

          Best,
          Josh

  26. David. Avatar
    David.

    Joshua I came across this 1967 Quarter and it caught my eye. In your openion does it look like something I should pursue to have checked out further??

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hey, David —

      The photo is blurry as I zoom in but this looks like it could be more than post-mint damage. Definitely something I would like to please check out further. Would you mind uploading clearer images if possible please? I will need to see reverse (tail’s side) photos, too, please.

      Thank you!
      Josh

      1. David. Avatar
        David.

        Josh I apologize for the delay. I will get some better quality photos posted in the next day or two. I’m curious for your thoughts.
        David

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, David!

          I look forward to seeing the photos!

          Thank you,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Laura —

      All of these pieces have various forms of post-mint damage, with most of it coming in the form of grooves and lines caused by heavy circulation and machine damage. While all are worth face value, they do make interesting academic studies of the affects of circulation wear.

      Thank you for your question and photos! Please check back whenever you have more coin questions!

      Best,
      Josh

  27. Wardaddy Avatar
    Wardaddy

    Josh, the first 2 photos are of a quarter I found about 10 years ago and noticed it first from it’s odd color and light weight. After some investigating I realized it is missing both clads. The other photos are of a quarter my wife just found in her saved change. No year marks as it appears to be from the state quarter time period. I understand it’s likely very difficult to tell just from photos if these are legitimate errors or not but any guess?
    Thanks https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/707fce4462461fe57c57cd5e561a97223e4df46b4e8260e08d85be495efd6efd.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/11fde7745df6ad1d62d48e82ee18492ca4404f1ccda0bc1b36a5c5acf1cfdfbd.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b5414f60b49a1b6fa1d693f27571b48430937b012dee596caf0fe378d019dd07.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4f2a0e21f140dcd86e6efe333d9ced780cec16f0e2866c7643ff96e68ace0357.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Wardaddy —

      As for the lightweight quarter, it unfortunately is hard to tell from a photo what might be going on. My first guess is corrosion, which usually accounts for lighter weight variances and off colors with most coins that present like this. If that’s the case, the coin would be worth face value.

      The year mark on the 50 States Quarter should be on the reverse (back) side; this is tricky because on most types of U.S. coins the date is usually located on the obverse (front).

      Thank you for your questions!
      Josh

      1. Wardaddy Avatar
        Wardaddy

        Could corrosion cause the outer clads to come off? On the double headed quarter there is no obverse

  28. Deray Woolum Avatar
    Deray Woolum

    I have three die marks on my 1969 kennedy half dollar the marks are.D,GR,FG is this common on the 1969

    1. Gulinky Lu Avatar

      Yes actually. The ‘D’ stands for DENVER which means it was struck in Denver, Colorado. The GR and FG are the designers initials. One person designed the obverse (front) and the other, the reverse (back). That’s why the GR appears on the obverse and FG appears on the reverse. Something special about the 1969 half dollar is that it’s 40% silver.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Laura!

      Oof, this one HAS seen some wear and tear, hasn’t it? It’s worth face value, but I’d pay more than a dime to hear this coin’s wild story!

      All my best,
      Josh

  29. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
    JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

    Hello there, Laura —

    Wow, this poor 1995-D Lincoln cent is nearly corroded away. Wow… makes you wonder what this coin may have seen in its lifetime.

    What an interesting find!
    Josh

  30. james karpenstein Avatar
    james karpenstein

    HI! I found a coin that appears to have no mint mark. I will send you a pic if you want one but it is very hard to get a picture in this comment! See you.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      I’ll look for the image! Thank you for your inquiry!

      Best,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, John!

      It certainly looks like you may have found a winner, though in-hand inspection would always be advised to further authenticate the coin and attribute its variety. For that, I suggest sending it to a third-party coin grading company or perhaps read the following article and submit to Charles Daughtrey, who is referenced in this interesting article: https://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ArticleId=2899

      Good luck!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, John —

      This looks like machine doubling. Compare to the photos here: https://www.pcgs.com/top100/coin7.aspx

      Machine doubling has a shelf-like appearance whereas the doubling on many doubled dies normally shows both the primary device/lettering and doubled areas with rounded edges and, often, stands as proud to the surface as does the primary design element.

      I hope this info helps,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, John —

      Judging from the photo, I believe this may be a Wide AM. Check out the comparison photos here: https://www.lincolncentresource.com/Featured/1992DcloseAM.html

      On the Close AM specimens, the bottom of the A and M are virtually touching. It seems there is a good degree of space on your coin. Perhaps submit the coin, along with your 82 ddr, for in-hand inspection under magnification for a second opinion.

      Good luck!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, John —

      The doubling is usually more pronounced on a 1972 doubled die, as seen in these images: https://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/2950

      While it never hurts to get an in-hand evaluation, I think your coin exhibits machine doubling.

      All my best,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, David —

      This is post-mint damage. The reverse (tail’s side) of the coin was planed off, which explains the small grooves. It appears that a machine or grinder of some type is responsible for this.

      Thank you for your question and photos!

      Best,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Laura!

      Great observation, but what it actually looks like is the coin has some heavy oxidation from environmental damage. Dimes, like other copper-nickel coins, are susceptible to oxidation because copper is such a reactive metal. While eye-catching, this piece is worth face value.

      I hope this info is helpful,
      Josh

  31. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    Hi Josh, Have you ever seen an error coin like this. 1972 Eisenhauer dollar. The back has no flaws.

    1. Mark Avatar
      Mark

      Hi Josh, Have you ever seen an error coin like this. 1972 Eisenhauer dollar. The back has no flaws https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/12462d6b326d803ebaf35c630a5e69bd238ade63a0f60772131151148e443eb1.jpg
      It is the back of the coin showing thru to the front notice the flipped STA from the words “STATES” from the back

    2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Mark —

      How are you doing? Would you please submit a photo of your 1972 Eisenhower dollar so I can see what’s going on with it and hopefully provide an opinion?

      Thank you, sir!
      Josh

      1. Mark Avatar
        Mark

        i did post a pic

        Mark Meade
        419-357-1414

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hello, Mark —

          This is very unusual… I’m not sure what happened here and suggest that you swing a photo of this coin by noted die variety expert John Wexler for further thoughts. Here is his URL: https://www.doubleddie.com/

          Best,
          Josh

          1. Mark Avatar
            Mark

            Thank you I will do that, Even though you are not sure how this happened any ideas on value?

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Mark —

            I’m not sure, because first we need to determine what/how this error occurred, how relatively scarce it is, and what the demand for it is. I do hope it’s a profitable find for you!

            Best,
            Josh

  32. Tori Selsor Avatar
    Tori Selsor

    Hi Josh, I was going through my coin sets and I found in my 1970 Mint Set has what I belive to be a double die 1970 D penny. I can see the doubling in the date, D and In God We Trust. Maybe a tiny bit in Liberty. I will try to take pics but its in a flat pack so I don’t know how good they will turn out. Its in an envelope that says Treasury Department San Francisco Calif. Official Business

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tori —

      I’m blowing up the image and while it’s fuzzy at that resolution, I do see doubling. I’m trying to attribute the coin and see if it’s a double die or machine doubling. I think it may be a doubled variety but can’t quite tell without getting a closer look at a clear image. I’m looking to see the shaping and character of the doubling to make my best educated opinion.

      Thanks!
      Josh

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Laura —

        I believe the top 1980 cent appears to have doubling in the date. It looks like machine doubling at this angle, but because the coin is a little fuzzier up close than I would need to see to help verify rather or not this is a variety, I suggest hanging on to it and possibly getting an in-hand inspection by a reputable coin dealer or die variety expert who can look at the coin under 5X magnification.

        Good luck!
        Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Laura —

      I don’t seem to see anything unusual about this 1973 cent. Would you please specify what about this coin brought about your attention?

      Thanks!
      Josh

  33. Kelly L Avatar
    Kelly L

    Hi, I just found a large amount of old coins medals and dablooms that my grandfather had stored away for many years . He passed away over 30+ years ago sorted out the majority over the past two months after finding them but I am wondering can u help assist if any are rare and worth the time spent doing so. Here are some pics. 1. Lincoln 1985 D with circle around D 2. Lincoln 1952/53?S/D 3.Lincoln 1959 D face back flipped 4. 1974 Kennedy half dollar clipped ends 5. Lincoln 1939 blow holes 6. Mercury dime 1943 possibly crossed with a sitting liberty dime not sure ? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3bb426df5b9cf9670ad75dffe351278db295fd61fe6f4e61a126c988bb33a531.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e5b63d64ab304c52f7bd71998dcc7a30094f0c219ee5d643da114660d35b7f3d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cfef41585337c67e7c55ec809e632c338e44d9b4179156da42d44545c30b8cb1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1ff7d5e4974a3db07627aee6603d7baca9efd3256794f73bc5cd8e599ba245a0.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ad68950ce0882a13f77b58bf798465b98c571a29d8142d411a1e626a95b3ba47.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e5d2f941fbbdfa48283b27eb25d161d8c1f294d38a27b447408c5d26227c27b4.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/aa01e4d59cf68c3e0011bd1fa87e1d61238a5c4f08eea53786fb2586ca11ddf1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/037faa391c44db5264e40c985822cfe3815b9d9f3cbc4fee8bdd382f7a26a914.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5e9b33302ab12399be09017fa9bcda7558a2e820a250879f28be63154188015d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/21004365a0e568c79cbda28d0dc517d60c366987770043ea4c0afe1114bcf2e6.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ea029904efa4e3a7b0ba37ea62fc00554820ac711989efd5c6897adbb8c28813.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4b2d7144d743b7f9590992af784047f8f5b225300dcbe1dd21623b8c7441efc3.jpg

  34. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
    JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

    Hi, Laura —

    Hmm… I don’t see any signs of die doubling in these images, but I also am unable to zoom in on these images. If you’d like to resubmit photos that I can expand, I’d be glad to take a second look!

    Thank you,
    Josh

    1. Francisco Avatar
      Francisco

      Hi there wanted to know what do you need to see the doubling on coins

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Francisco —

        Coin doubling is often visible with the naked eye, but the best tool for any coin collector to have would be a 5-10X coin loupe/magnifying glass.

        Good luck,
        Josh

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Francisco —

            These 1975 copper cents appear normal (though the lower 1975-D looks discolored) are worth 2 cents each.

            Best,
            Josh

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Francisco —

            This coin appears to have some post-mint damage issues. Those impressions in the metal appear to have been made after the coin was struck. Because of this, the coin is worth face value.

            I hope this info helps,
            Josh

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Laura —

        This is a discolored Lincoln cent, and it appears to have been cleaned at one point. This is worth more than face value not because of the color but its metal content – copper. This piece is worth about 2 cents.

        Best,
        Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Laura —

      Based on the images you provided, I don’t see anything unusual about these coins, which are worth face value.

      Best,
      Josh

  35. Cody Eugoh Avatar
    Cody Eugoh

    I have a Standing Liberty coin with what looks like a broadstrike error, how much do you think it would be worth? and does it look real to you? please mind the bad picture + the flat coin (it has all the wording https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6498834035260e26e11fe9a46056d87661c534f702c121d6a8538a7f1a79b1c4.jpg )

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Cody —

      Very observant. While this is not a broadstrike (when a coin is struck without its retaining collar, thus spreading out the metal upon strike), it’s a very well worn Standing Liberty quarter. It’s worth at least $3.50 and possibly more based on the presence of a date – even the mere trace of a date.

      Good luck,
      Josh

      1. Cody Eugoh Avatar
        Cody Eugoh

        Thanks for the answer, I found another coin (dated 1877) which I looked up and it’s a Seated Liberty Half Dollar, but I never found an exact price when looking through different sites. The coin itself looks like a VF30, and has no notable errors or marks on it. Could you help?

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Cody —

          By “P” mintmark, do you mean this is a Philadelphia coin without a mintmark (because the U.S. Mint didn’t introduce the “P” mintmark until 1942)? Or is there a “P” inscribed on the coin somewhere? Would you please upload a photo of this coin to the comments section? I’ll be able to give you a better impression on the price of your specific coin after seeing an image of it.

          Thank you for your question!
          Josh

  36. Sergio Montes Avatar
    Sergio Montes

    I have a 1993 D with an s inside of it and the coin is thicker any advice if this is a true error

  37. Sergio Montes Avatar
    Sergio Montes

    I also have a 1982 d large date stamped over a 1982 s small date, there seems to be some slight doubling on the 2 serif style then on the reverse their’s a 3 stamped on lincoln’s monument plain as day. well under 10x magnification that is. i cant find anything about closest error is some thing like the 1960 small date /large date plz any advice where i can have it checked by a professional

  38. Chris Jarrell Avatar
    Chris Jarrell

    I’m new to coin collecting so please be patient with me. Years ago I found a money bag hidden in my wall filled with about 1000 wheat pennies. One penny stuck out amongst all the rest. It’s a 1962 penny that’s small than the rest. It’s thinner also. It’s not in the best of shape but I was hoping that you could help me with it. Here are a few pics. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d02e0f85f521d895707883bf9ca8702a891e4753e9bfddad68a1f4d588d5109e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c29a9803d758606b5a51ed204c0cb06ee88c21e97363cb07fcd2b43d80558ca1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e852cb03a2f5d066ed6b37a80c4381f96b459fdeb0664ee957ae4fd46090e58c.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Chris —

      How cool that you found that bag of pennies in your wall. The small penny was apparently dipped in acid or another corrosive agent that stripped away much of the coin’s outer layer of metal. This piece is worth face value at best, but it’s nevertheless a striking piece and pointed reminder of the many things that can happen to a coin after it leaves the Mint.

      Good luck in your coin collecting ventures, and please feel free to stop by again!
      Josh

      1. Chris Jarrell Avatar
        Chris Jarrell

        Thank you Sir. I appreciate the info. Finding the coins in the wall was really cool. We lived there for about 8yrs before we found it. Thanks again and I will definitely stop by again.
        Chris

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re welcome, Chris! I look forward to hearing from you again!

  39. Keith Jeffers Avatar
    Keith Jeffers

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bdee289bbfba4dad739ed478fd6891dd040270fcc00b15df3deaf9f63a48c9f4.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/142ca1bf4c829268d4cf464b9f97c3cef5ab880f2eb0b3b37cbd9c8847c4808f.jpg

    Here’s one for you that I can’t figure out. It doesn’t appear to be filed down or buffed because the lettering extends down into the edge of the cent. This is on both sides of the coin.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Keith —

      This one would probably require an in-hand inspection to really know for sure what’s going on… At first it appeared to me as if it is a porosity issue, but the closer I look the more it seems like a strike error of some sort. I’m not really sure without seeing the coin in person and looking at it from different angles. It might be worth taking to a well-respected local coin dealer for a closer look or submission to a coin-grading professional.

      If you want info on finding coin dealers, be sure to check out this link: https://uscoinsguide.com/coin_dealer/
      For a searchable list of coin dealers, please check out this link: https://uscoinsguide.com/coin_dealer/
      If you’re interested in submitting the coin to a third-party coin-grading firm, here’s info on the different companies performing those services: https://uscoinsguide.com/slabbed_coins/

      Good luck!
      Josh

      1. Keith Jeffers Avatar
        Keith Jeffers

        Thank you for your response Josh. I think I will send this one off to be inspected.

  40. wade & kelly Avatar
    wade & kelly

    Hello. We have a teenager we are trying to get into a hobby (o https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ee879531c35e8dc5b3102aea9ae4c03ea77f99861726349357129c03b33a1f57.jpg ther than video games!) So we told him about how we have been into coins lately. He looked in his change jar and this is one of the first nickels he found. Kinda cool looking.
    The front is fine but the back is blank with only the “ticel” of the word Monticello visable. There is a swirled pattern to it and the coin itself is thinner than usual and sort of dome-shaped in profile. (Like a ufo shape )
    We have a theory but thought having you take a peak and give your opinion might be rather cool for him to hear.
    Thanks!!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Wade and Kelly!

      Wow, what a nickel! The groove marks and clear strike on the design indicate this is a post-mint alteration likely created as a piece of art.

      It is wonderful to hear that you’re encouraging your son to hop into numismatics! I’ll tell you what — it’s the pastime that never needs to be updated or rebooted! I suggest if you’re looking for cool coins to hold aside that you check out the pieces listed in these posts:

      Coins That Are More Worth More Than Face Value: https://uscoinsguide.com/us-coins/
      Error Coins: https://uscoinsguide.com/error-coins/

      Please feel free to holler if you have any questions, comments, or need suggestions!

      Good luck,
      Josh

  41. Ronald Raulston Avatar
    Ronald Raulston

    I have a 1988 nickle that I think is very special but I need someone else to tell me I’m right. I have only just begun to learn about coins and collecting them. I think there are several errors on this coin and just need someone to see what I think I see. Could someone please help me out? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f02bd513333b7eaba76717fdc43fe9d5b4850b7a8604ecb81e4d5ef094ac4ca1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e11ef4b1e077838c993f59645eceef8a4956d00add4691affdd7e145f4488c6d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cdc5c4701bb7bdd77d7482c6403611a618a94962a6e4e768aa413ccf5161de8e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/092a3a301a28b05ab7b155a7f1bd1af49ae9902a09f6866f9d5b7e0de26a3463.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Ronald —

      It appears this coin may have been struck on an aging die, which would contribute to the mushy nature of the lettering and devices on the nickel. Nothing else stands out to me on this coin, though perhaps you see something that the image isn’t picking up on.

      From what I see, this 1988-D nickel is numismatically worth face value.

      Best,
      Josh

  42. Shanelle Dawn Wyant Avatar
    Shanelle Dawn Wyant

    My husband found an Indian penny..But someone had crossed out both sides with an x and made a hole in the date..All we can tell is that it is an 18 something 9 maybe..Can anyone help me with some info on it if it’s worth anything because it is rare?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Shanelle —

      Would you please post a photo of this 18XX Indian Head cent?

      Thank you!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Lonnia —

      These lines are post-mint gouges and are not part of the coin’d design. It appears to be a wholly normal coin. This piece is worth about $1.20.

      All the best,
      Josh

  43. Matt perez Avatar
    Matt perez

    So I have a 1984 D penny with what looks like O’s printed on it. They are the same o in “in God we trust”. The O’s are in line after the t in trust. And one of the O’s is in the middle of Lincoln’s head. I feel like it may be bubbles but the O’s are all the same size and pretty distinct.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      HI, Matt —

      Would you please post a photo of this coin here in the forum section so I can check it out and suggest a possible value?

      Thank you so much,
      Josh

  44. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
    Leah Greenwood-Collier

    I found what I believe is a die capped 1988 D penny in my change. It is flat, but there’s a “rim” almost all the way around on the head side. Would it be worth anything?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Leah —

      If it is indeed a capped die error, its value could be as much $25 to $50 or even far more. Would you please post a photo of this coin here in the forum so I can try and assist further?

      Thank you!
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Leah —

          I’m afraid this is not a die-capped Lincoln cent but rather one that has experienced severe damage that is worth face value. Die caps, usually, have much more pronounced cupping of the rim and might also exhibit blankness on all or part of at least one side of the coin.

          The 1987 cent also appears to have some signs of moderate to severe damage and, like the 1988 penny, is worth face value.

          Cheers,
          Josh

          1. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
            Leah Greenwood-Collier

            Thank you!

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            You’re welcome, Leah!

  45. Shawn Fransen Avatar
    Shawn Fransen

    I have a 1962 proof Franklin most of it on the front is a proof finish but at the bottom there is a section that is dull and rough is that a lamination error. I broke up the set and put it in a 2×2. it was in the original package

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Shawn —

      It’s hard to say without seeing a photo, but having seen many of these earlier proof coins, it might just be a striking or finish irregularity, which is extremely common on the pre-1970s proofs. A regular 1962 proof Franklin half dollar with average eye appeal is worth about $15.

      Again, if you’d like to upload a photo here to the forum I would be glad to further assist!

      Thank you,
      Josh

  46. Richard Willett Avatar
    Richard Willett

    I have a really strange penny a 1969D which appears to be a mistrike penny. The reverse is perfectly normal. I thought at first it had to be a fake, fraud or fluke but because the obverse is normal and LIBERTY runs across what appears to be an extra head and shoulder, I began to wonder. Take a look and let me know. It was given to me with two other pennies that have lesser errors, some pennies with state states, a beautiful 1907 Indian Head Penny and a lot of good Wheat Pennies. Please email or let me know what you think. What I think I know. It was obviously circulated, the reverse is perfect (for an old coin – nothing major) and LIBERTY runs across the extra image. If it is real any idea of value?

    Thanks in advance.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f261cb9a4890a35b3497df256df426741d70138954a860a6bcafea9a1f2980f1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/84680f104668158b417abc9da806e9ca8edbcac4a0b5b2c0cc87b94ecebb84c4.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Richard!

      This appears to be a strike-through error. In other words, it looks like this coin was struck on a die that had foreign matter on it, possibly a piece of a cloth rag used to degrease the dies. Strike-through errors are highly collectible and often worth more than $100. I recommend you show this coin to a die variety/error expert for a second opinion, but am pretty confident that is what you have here.

      One of the other professionals I suggest is John Wexler, whose info you can find here: https://www.doubleddie.com/

      Good luck — and great find!
      -Josh

  47. Richard Willett Avatar
    Richard Willett

    I forgot to post email address: rdwillett@comcast.net. Not sure how all this works. I have been collecting pennies and silver since 1982 and computer stuff still new to me. Especially chat, twitter,…..

  48. bob smith Avatar
    bob smith

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1a72782ba7874b2b3f20520bc4ee77bd86d61438fcd2b986380d5658f20cc962.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/18ed97720a53a50b115f15c40ce459250b70168e5d441bb3e7cafea8ada46306.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bd29fc05312828bacc4316ca7c94ae666f78737f216c7cd037b0fee5ae08fda3.jpg

    I have a penny that I recently found while coin searching. It has a relatively normal looking reverse and edge but the observe is a bright almost gold looking color! What would you value this coin at?
    My email is bobdsmith3@gmail.com.

    In each picture the rightmost penny is the penny of interest it is from 2005. This includes the photo of the edge.

    1. bob smith Avatar
      bob smith

      Sorry about the image quality.

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        No worries! I think I was able to see what I needed to properly answer your question.

        Thanks again,
        Josh

    2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Bob —

      There appears to be a toning difference, as the golden color of the coin on the right in the lower image is pretty common among the copper-plated zinc cents. Unless there is an error in the design or a variety, your piece is worth about 10 to 20 cents if it’s in uncirculated condition and face value if worn.

      Thank for your question and photos!
      -Josh

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi,Bob —

        This 2005-D cent has some normal toning for its age and I think is priced fairly as an uncirculated piece.

        Thanks for your question,
        Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, DrTtX —

      There is some surface wear on this piece and signs of environmental damage on the reverse (tail’s side) in the dark area. This piece is worth face value.

      Thank you for your question and photo!

      Best,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Awesome, Leah! Yes, you did find a cracked die — and a good one at that. What year is this quarter?

      Keep looking! Where there’s one, there’s more!
      -Josh

      1. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
        Leah Greenwood-Collier

        It’s a 1996.

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Leah —

            Best as I can tell from the photo I’d say that’s a die crack… This piece seems to have a lot of them, too, based on what I’ve seen.It may have been caused by die wear, but it’s hard to say for sure. The coin is circulated, so it won’t gain as much value as if it were uncirculated, but that die crack on the reverse is incredible. This piece is unusual and I’d be uncertain what this might be worth only because it seems unique. If you were to sell it, I’d suggest listing it on eBay where it could gain the interest of a lot of different bidders who collect die varieties.

            Awesome find, Leah! Really neat stuff here….

            Thank you again for posting your question and photos!
            -Josh

          2. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
            Leah Greenwood-Collier

            Wow! Thank you Josh! My 83 yo day knows how much I’ve been enjoying this, so today he brought me a jar of wheats and a jar with some misc. coins in it. I pulled out a few of the wheats, just to look at the dates, and one of them was a 43 steel! In the misc. jar there were 5 mill coins and 6 old foreign coins my dad found when he used to metal detect, and I found out 2 of them are silver! It’s been a good day! And I have 225.00 worth of small dollar rolls to check, and a whole jar of wheats! Yesterday I found another die crack, so three in my first week and a half! I’m on a roll! No pun intended….haha! Oh, I almost forgot, I found a dime yesterday with a little piece of die chip or something on Roosevelt’s eyebrow that makes him look like he has a mole on his brow! Posting pics. Maybe you can give me some insight as to what it is… https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/489767d89af723fee07268794c4cdc96e2c6a37681f6a7f5d6370fdfb51af501.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c1b8479053a9f67be65e621f4f71fcfb4847ea54bc108864c683079b6e502d7a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e7bd22103a2efbd7c1dd62fb72a1bb2476d45f2721fa02b2cc98666053ef13c6.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7be5a15e8c87984335c5a903fca0f778156483e872a04bb503c714eabc5e299e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b8c8dd06dc08e0ffcb9d657e6229cbae61d221688741977da31e731bf683f5e3.jpg

          3. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
            Leah Greenwood-Collier

            That was supposed to say my 83 yo dad! Hehe!

          4. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Ha! I know what you meant but thanks for the editorial clarification!

          5. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hello, Leah!

            SOOO glad you are enjoying this! Yes, you’re certainly on a roll (ha ha)! The die chip would be worth perhaps only $1 to $2 but is still worth holding aside. I suggest you check out this page, too: https://uscoinsguide.com/us-coins/

            It has a resource to many of the valuable dates for each denomination and may be helpful to you as you move forward.

            Please keep letting us know what you find! It sounds like you’re hitting on some nice finds and may have several more ahead!

            Good luck,
            Josh

  49. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
    Leah Greenwood-Collier

    I went through a few of my wheats yesterday and found my first clipped planchet! Woo-hoo! Yes, I AM enjoying this! Also placed my first order for collecting supplies. Since I’m into errors I’m getting a 5x – 20x magnifier.
    I have another coin I want to show you and see what you think. The first coin is obviously my clip. On the second coin there is an odd indentation above the date. The pics don’t do it justice. I’ve been told it’s probably from pliers or some kind of tool after mint, but I’ve found these same markings around the side etching on 2 different presidential dollars. I’m having a hard time believing it wasn’t done in the mint. The scratch on the reverse of this https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/66dc6906f97ce35a98a427e51db0febc69a4659fc3b25b0bd108f4841d78dace.jpg coin is unfortunate. But it will go into my collection as my first! I dont know why it seperated my clip pics, but there are 3 of them. I couldnt get my camera phone to zoom in on the edges of those other two coins. Ill keep trying.https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b934869cd4116356de4b8a9d8a40d714121a720614300263d78aae5fa76eebc0.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/976c1546b3a959c59a0b899d17226ce6357058e279c3b3f919a4ab937849ff8f.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7a87c99182b671800ce082f077209f6ffe72266dec79aecc76d3f072e39fdc5b.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/506e6156622a9ba269ff61511927c36c46aa19cb546774504a77f505320144a2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9333a41e7c49f0cf634925475f2a44b173ad484df6eafd510a551e7bb788bceb.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/342357cabb42d1cd60aea7ea309f15bc557182cdf22b5d29d93dc9f712058eec.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Leah —

      The indentation above the date on the 1981 cent is an example of post-Mint damage and in this case leaves the coin worth its copper melt value of 2 cents. As for the 1944 Lincoln cent, that one is a toughie… I lean toward it being a clipped planchet due to the shape of rim around the clipped part and the appearance that the segment of missing rim is blended into the surrounding metal, as if a mint error. An in-hand inspection by an error coin professional who can examine the edge at multiple angles would be the best help here, but I will go on a limb and call this a clipped planchet from what I see here. Clipped planchets of this size are often worth $5 to $20… Awesome find presuming that’s what you have, Leah!

      Keep on doing what you’re doing!
      Josh

  50. Adam Mitchell Avatar
    Adam Mitchell

    Let me start by saying I am very new to this. I recently read an article about common coins that are possibly valuable, so I started inspecting my change. As I began to do some research, I became fascinated by all the possible errors and things that could lead to coins being more valuable than their face value! I find it incredibly interesting, so, even if I find a quarter that’s actually worth $2, I consider it a win!

    So today I found a 1972 Washington Quarter that appears to have a “cud” (am I using that term right?) in the mintmark. It’s kind of hard to see in the picture, but the “D” appears to be completely filled in.

    I’ve been scouring the web for this apparent error, but have gotten mixed results. Is this worth anything more than $0.25? Looking forward to the answer either way! Thanks!

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b23e4f4fb8e1734debfdd6427acc0590e7373d4c74acfdf520e93437f7815c98.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Adam!

      It might just be heavy wear (a close look under a 10X magnification device would assist) but it looks like this may be a filled mintmark error. If so, these are somewhat common as far as errors go but are nonetheless worth $1 to $3 or more.

      Hang on to it… I’d call it a win, too!

      Thank you for your question,
      Josh

      1. Adam Mitchell Avatar
        Adam Mitchell

        Thanks Josh!

        And thanks for the quick response! It’s totally awesome of you to freely share your knowledge with us! Its incredibly helpful to people, like me, who are newly hooked on this fascinating hobby. I’m looking forward to perusing my change this weekend for any kind of error I can find, and researching as much as I can!

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          I appreciate those kind words, Adam! Thank you so much, and good luck with your finds. If you come across anything interesting, don’t be shy in posting it here!

          Cheers,
          Josh

    2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Oh, by the way, very close with the “cud” terminology… A die cud is a raised patch of metal, but normally one that is connected to the rim on the outer side of the coin; in this case you would have an error known as a die break or die chip, which looks to have possibly resulted in a filled mintmark… Lots of nomenclature, but I hope it all makes sense!

      Thanks,
      Josh

      1. DA Hurt Avatar
        DA Hurt

        I have that 1943penny durrell 4047817742 cll me

  51. WorldWeary Avatar
    WorldWeary

    Hey everyone! Glad I found this site, as I recently found a very unusual penny in my change. The last number on the date looks like a mint mark (D). But the normal ‘D’ mint mark is usually smaller than this apparent one. So is this an error coin of sorts, or has it been altered by an object striking it? Just what do I have here? Thanks in advance! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/00c2fb2ebefb9d8f7e322cfcd42463de86f833eeaecd38c2f8f23ff2776affe8.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1fb7ea36f87cc71c8a9e86ef294cfab0e883d3043659d99c84d76d619180495a.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, World Weary —

      The last digit of the 1940 Lincoln cent was actually damaged after it left the Mint, and in this case the damage resulted in the digit being shoved inward. This piece is still worth about 3 cents but unfortunately it is not an error.

      Thank you for your question and photo!
      Josh

      1. WorldWeary Avatar
        WorldWeary

        Thank you Josh! Appreciate the info. Highly interesting blog you have here.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Thank you so much, WorldWeary! Please feel free to check back anytime — always glad to assist however I can!

          Cheers,
          Josh

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Tracy —

            This is an interesting coin, but the reverse is flat and smooth due to post-mint damage. It looks like somebody planed the reverse (tail’s) design with a sander, polishing the metal. There are a few grooves in the upper-right area of the lower photo that further indicate this. This was done some time ago as the coin has an even, aged patina. Why someone would do this? Perhaps to incorporate the coin into a piece of jewelry, or even to pass the time.

            Such a piece is worth its copper value, which presently is two cents.

            Thank you for your question and photos,
            Josh

          2. Tracy Miller Avatar
            Tracy Miller

            Hi josh, I have a 1963 or 65 penny that just doesn’t look right. Why is one part of the coin on the obverse look a different color and the date is light struck? Thank you for your time. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/021bbc666b75c9728a9fd6cd535834bfa5c7d9e2aa5a5d51edab55ead0dab62f.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/86fcb514800fa27f345666518fa9756d2677e08d625905076481bf38e44a382c.png

          3. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            HI, Tracy —

            I’m not positive, but this actually appears to be a 1969-S Lincoln cent, though based on the appearance of the motto IN GO WE TRUST and LIBERTY this is not a doubled die.

            My first suspicion is that this coin may be a so-called strike-through error, in which a piece of fabric (or something else) obscures part of the die from striking the coin properly. Though upon closer inspection I’m more convinced the surface issues are as a result of exposure to acid. While unusual, it’s not totally unheard of for a coin to be partially affected by caustic chemicals on only one side (when, for example, inserted in a coin folder that exposes only one side of a coin), or to have experienced other surface-altering situations that manipulate just a single side, or even single portion of a side, of a coin. Based on what I see, it almost looks as if someone intentionally applied acid to just one side of the obverse (or “head’s side”) though why is beyond my comprehension. It may have also been accidental exposure to a caustic agent. I can tell it was likely acid because of the extreme porosity and disfigurement on that portion of the obverse.

            While I’m pretty confident this is a post-Mint alteration, it might be worth sending the photo on to an error expert for a second opinion to rule out that it’s NOT a strike-through error — something potentially worth hundreds of dollars. I’m doubtful, but I’d feel remiss without at least suggesting this. One expert to consider is Fred Weinberg. He’s among the top experts in coin errors: https://www.fredweinberg.com/contact-us/

            Good luck!
            Josh

          4. Tracy Miller Avatar
            Tracy Miller

            Hi josh, thank you for your opinion on my last penny, I was going through some coins I had put away and forgot about until now. I found a 1997 D penny that looks like it has a piece of the coin missing by Lincolns nose.i noticed that there are no scratches on it around the part that is missing. Also on the reverse side of the coin “of” is almost not seen like it’s a light strike. I was wondering if you could tell me if this looks like a error to you? Thank you for your help.

          5. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Tracy —

            It could be a die break or die crack that caused that extra piece of metal by the nose. I know you said you tried to post a photo, which I’ll really need to give a good opinion. If you can kindly try to re-upload the image — a JPG or PNG file uploaded here in the comments section should work — that would be great.

            Thank you!
            Josh

          6. Tracy Miller Avatar
            Tracy Miller

            Thank you, I tried to send you another coin to see if you could tell me if it is a error coin. I did a little observing myself so I don’t waste your time. I have a 1997 D Lincoln penny. Right by Lincolns nose there is what appears to be a dent in the coin. Also on the reverse side of the coin the word “of” is almost not visible just by looking at it with your eyes. I was thinking maybe a light strike? But the obverse side maybe a cud error? Thank you for all your help and time.

          7. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Ah, got it! Let me see…

          8. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            OK, Tracy —

            It appears to be post-Mint damage, or a gouge essentially. I was hopeful it was a RAISED patch of metal (thus a possible die break), but this is post-Mint. On a positive note, yes, there is evidence of a weak strike on the reverse. While this does not necessarily increase the coin’s book value, there are still folks who will pay a small amount over face value for such a strike peculiarity.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy!

      Please see my comments on the earlier post of this question and photos!

      Thank you,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Gulinky —

      Yep, I think you’re on target here. The filled “B” appears to be a chip and is probably worth $1 to $2, while the nickel has some type of weakness. It might be a late die state, but nevertheless worth hanging onto. It might go for 25 to 50 cents to an interested buyer.

      Hope this info helps! Cool finds all around…

      Best,
      Josh

  52. Eric Christensen Avatar
    Eric Christensen

    I have a cent with a partial image of the reverse(columns etc) on the obseve of the cent, it’s not a grease stain, you can see and feel it. I am having trouble remembering the name of the error, also is it just a common error?. It’s a 1982 cent. Please let me know

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Eric —

      It may be a grease-filled die weakness, but it could also be a weak strike or even post-Mint damage. May I please see a photo of the coin?

      Thank you,
      Josh

  53. bob smith Avatar
    bob smith

    Hey it’s me again.
    I have a dime that has both that of a dime and a penny stamped on the reverse. Its date is 1994 and it has minimal wear but is definitely not in proof condition. Would you please tell me what you would value this coin at? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c8b08534337a1eb7f4b5702b9bef8c488bb41f4fe4a413c62e5a9581e0185ef0.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/581f45cc70f6cbbbd7841bb2ddd2ad4fb98dab7b351fa9ef58eca566adb674b0.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Bob —

      Hmm… I do see the Memorial reverse design on the reverse of the Roosevelt dime. Logically, it’s possible that the dime, smaller than the cent planchet by diameter, could have gotten into a cent hopper and some how wind up trapped in the striking machinery, perhaps between a cent reverse die and/or a finished Lincoln cent. There’s also the possibility that someone outside the Mint hammered a Lincoln cent onto this dime — something I’ve seen the results of many times(!)

      What I’d need to know going forward is if the Memorial design appears in relief (stands up, above the surface of the coin) or is incused (sunken into the coin). What do you see?

      If you want to send the coin in for inspection or get a second opinion, I suggest running this coin by the folks at CONECA — they’re error/variety specialists who have the official task of attributing such pieces as legitimate errors and varieties… Here’s their link: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      I’d be glad to help further…
      Josh

      1. bob smith Avatar
        bob smith

        someone mashed a penny into it.
        ;-;

  54. Bill ward Avatar
    Bill ward

    I https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3e135b3e8ab8c4709c591d56ef8b893bb201840a4cf398ab4572a4433fb36c51.jpg have had this penny for about 50 years now and still do not know how this error happened. I have had numerous coin dealers look at it and are undecided as to its authenticity since there is no record of errors of this type. A number of years ago, I did some research on line about the 19399 date and did find someone that had posted about a misdated penny; a 19399, but have not been able to find that post thus far. No one has given me a suitable solution thus far. Most comments are since there is no record of this type error, it must be a forgery. Please advise. Thank you
    This may be a duplicate post but two new and better pics. Thanks again!

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7a127ec71a8168c80d7953e178bf5044ae0c2698785006a6a65c0c9699a88d11.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7a127ec71a8168c80d7953e178bf5044ae0c2698785006a6a65c0c9699a88d11.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3e54c7a028ad771e46cb16389ff96cc09faa03114c35cf38db5f29eca1dcd664.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Bill —

      I’m happy to help… it looks like this coin may be a clipped planchet error — the very edge of the coin may have been miscut, creating a very tiny gap in the rim and the edge. It could also be post-Mint vice grip damage, or something similar. An in-hand inspection is probably the best for determining because the coin would need to be viewed at different angles, but there is very much the possibility that it is a Mint-made clip error. If so, it’s likely worth somewhere between $5 and $10, more or less.

      Thank you for sharing the photos and story behind this coin… Happy collecting!

      Best,
      Josh

      1. Bill Ward Avatar
        Bill Ward

        Thanks for the info. You were the the first person to give me a reasonable answer as to what it may be. Sure was hoping for
        More than $5-10 bucks. LOL Guess I will leave it to the kids. Again thanks!!

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re welcome, Bill! As I said, it may be worth getting it looked at in-hand, but I’m pretty confident based on the photos that it’s, at best, a relatively minor (but still neat) clipped planchet. Definitely something I would have also kept and enjoyed in my collection had I found it in circulation.

          Best wishes,
          Josh

  55. Kate Adams Avatar
    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Kate!

      It looks like this coin has seen some serious post-Mint damage, based on the surface details and the type of fold presented here. Nevertheless, the coin is worth 2 cents for its copper value — and is quite the neat eye popper, too!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Kate Adams Avatar
        Kate Adams

        Cool, I can’t imagine what could have caused the ridge. Pretty neat though. Maybe it will be a lucky charm.
        Thanks for your help!

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re welcome, Kate!

  56. paul Avatar
    paul

    Hi! Sorry for so many pictures. I tried to get a good picture of this penny that has the “IN GOD WE TRUST” defective. The lower portion of the letters are missing or flatten. The word “WE” has a gash in the center of the “WE”. Your opinion would be appreciated. If I need to get a better picture I will ask a friend to help me out.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fd215c192b4d0637c565b079af9f614211935bd849efddffb84322e382063f10.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3551aee50bee10708a1dfb8136591774c14fad7aec5fc0eb60d23efe9df2936d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/403d6bb4ec5b5879a126a598adee98efd030c144040fb29537f1ad3805a8f4eb.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Paul —

      This is a nice 1934 cent with good, original color. The “WE” does appear to have a small gash which appears to be post-mint damage. Overall this piece is worth 5 to 10 cents and is a nice coin for its age. A keeper in my book.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  57. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
    Leah Greenwood-Collier

    Hi Joshua! I know you’ve just been waiting ti see what I’d pop up with next! Haha! Well I finally got to start going through all those coins I had my son pick up for me. Only a little less than 2 rolls of nickels so far though. Hahaha. But so far out of those I haven’t found one coin newer that 1999! And most in pretty good shape! This is one of them that I’m really not sure about. It looks like it has some kind of “doubling” and I looked for split serifs, but I just really can’t tell what it is. I am talking about the lettering, and the numbering. And if you look, you can see above the word TRUST there is a odd kind of little rim just inside the rim. Actually, ive already attached the pictures so i dont know if you can see it or not. I have got to come up with a better camera too! Trying to get it where people are seeing what I’m seeing is impossible with a phone camera! Also, I have this 1982 D penny that I’m wondering what’s going on with the date and mint mark. I swear with magnification it looks like a D underneath!
    I also figured I’d go aged and attach this pretty 1984 cent I got in change today! Are those flow lines on it? It actuall posted ahead of the other two. Hehe! Ill be looking forward to hearing from you!

    Leah
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/217675ee496c64600fe27958e65dcf5f1f74eb16f68ae29a54416d8542d8eb67.jpg
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8b5586eb09954ef30092160b308edc5c1c501b9e8a2a2c6e57c1d959fb718ec2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6a8b30f682f845b203ecaf2324791b07f77692bd8b7044295eebb73f07cfba14.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/826af70af24bff2505ba712b566f936faf2fbc0e2f3b892c6b4f5bc917aa97cf.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/93e51482e0b76a17ecd753685a86c5ec5ba9f3686ee0e1cb24a177ccb6e7924d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/34c2c546f8eb8b8a8635d1fe0c97a0c00fea7870388243192832553979fd841f.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9a8bace303bfb7bb95ae1c9b2c7f78b01a94839c9d07f589ca5a0cb81b6a22bd.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Leah!

      Very nice… the 1984 Lincoln cent seems to be a light die clash error, which is generally worth $1 to $2. Those lines? Great guess with the flow lines, but actually those are bubbles and ripples caused by poor bonding of the copper plating to the zinc inner core. Very serious ripples can also be worth a little extra money, even though they are effectively just planchet defects.

      The 1982-D Lincoln cent is very interesting… I would have called it a repunched mintmark, but it looks like the tail of the “9” in the date is also doubled, no? I’m uncertain if this is a late-stage die or something more valuable, and would suggest getting a second opinion from die variety expert John Wexler (https://www.doubleddie.com/).

      As for the 1984 Jefferson nickel, I see what appears to be minor doubling in the LIBERTY especially. I don’t see any attributed doubled dies listed for this date, so unless it’s a new variety (possible, but unlikely) I would have to say it’s likely just machine doubling. You might pass this by Wexler also, but based on what I see it will be considered signs of die deterioration.

      You’re making some really great finds… I’m so glad you’re enjoying your numismatic journeys!

      Please post anything else you find interesting, and ask away about any questions you have.

      Cheers,
      Josh

      1. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
        Leah Greenwood-Collier

        Thank you Joshua! Of course I will keep you updated! On the 1982 D cent, it actually looks more like a die chip or or break on the number 9. I know it’s hard to tell in my photos. What are the odds it’s a die chip right next to a doubled mint mark? Lol
        Note: This coin came from change from a friend’s car I traded for change I had gone through, and the 1984 cent came from change I got from the store. It is also sightly “toned”, which at this stage (when it is just getting an evenly distributed, bluish color), I think can be very attractive. I know you can’t really see it in the photos though. I know some people look down on toning, but at the right levels, I think it gives a welcome distinction to some coins. I already have a small collection of these coins, all pennies, and most with the same planchet problem.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Leah —

          It is true that toning does have both its fans and detractors, though it seems lately collectors are far more embracing of toning than they were, say, 20 years ago. Certain colors do suggest negative influences, such as chemical damage or other forms of environmental damage, but I’ve seen some blue-toned Lincoln cents take some very good prices in the high grades.

          The 1982-D cent is a tough call, only because I’m unsure about what happened to the tail of the “9” based on what I see in the images. The doubled D is almost unmistakably a repunched mintmark, and those do have some value. Normally such varieties go for $2 to $3 or more, though, again, I don’t know if the “9” will make that coin more of a complex piece or not. Its one of those things that are best judged in-hand under a coin loupe (magnifier) at different angles.

          A die chip it might be, but it looks more like the line traces the general shape of the 9, which might suggest something else in the way the die was created. Or it could be die deterioration, which isn’t necessarily a value addition.

          Hmmm….

          Til’ next time!
          Josh

  58. Zina Michael Beasley Avatar
    Zina Michael Beasley

    Hi Joshua! First, thank you so much for giving up what has to be a lot of time looking at all of these pictures and answering all of these questions! You are doing a great service for all of us. Second, I just heard about the 1995 double-die pennies and I immediately set to work going through all of my loose change. Though I didn’t find any double-dies, I did find a 1995 penny with weird edging. I don’t know if you can tell from my picture but there is nice deep edging from the top of Lincoln’s head to the word “Liberty” and around the bottom. As you head up towards the “D” and date there is very little edging. In fact, the coin is almost completely smooth there with no groove to sort of catch your nail on. Does that make sense? I haven’t seen anything about this type of error so I am a little curious about it. Thanks again for your time. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d6524252ca46b8cd905ae4b8a6e47151fa05f63296c344e8d6dae31b884409ce.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Zina!

      I appreciate your very kind comments! It’s my pleasure to assist here!

      I’m not too sure I see exactly what you’re asking about (I’m sorry!) but it does appear this is a very well-struck Lincoln cent. It does, however, show evidence of wear. Assuming this is not a well-collected variety, if it is one, its value is probably not much more than face value. It’s still worth holding on to if you see things about it that are unusual. While it may not necessarily have any extra monetary value now, it could if collectors in the future find added value in such a piece and wish to pay you more.

      I hope this info helps!
      -Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Pedro —

      This Roosevelt dime seems to show evidence of environmental damage and is worth face value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  59. Kani Kim Avatar
    Kani Kim

    Hello,

    This is the penny i have. It has some extra bronze (or let say any shiny metal) + E CEN (n written diverse). Any comment? Thanks in advance. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/696cdc71b9493dbf59350e1b978ee8428ab05464af4f43b6f5e5b53f63f8aa64.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Kani —

      Hmm… I do see the affected area on the bottom left of the obverse but the photo is a tad fuzzy and am unsure what might be going on. I do ask, is any of the reversed lettering in that area incuse (going into the surface) or reliefed (standing up from the surface, as usual on coins)?

      Thank you,
      Josh

      1. Tim Stroud Avatar
        Tim Stroud

        It is glue

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          It looks that way, Tim, but I always prefer to see a clearer image just to make sure! Those who suspect the surface has glue or another type of resin can safely dip the coin in acetone to see if the affected surface anomaly is washed away.

          1. Tim Stroud Avatar
            Tim Stroud

            I keep a quart of pure acetone on hand just for such as this and to remove mild cases of PVC contamination.

          2. Kani Kim Avatar
            Kani Kim

            He Joshua and Tim,

            Sorry been quite busy n had been a bit disappointed with my Penny. Anway, I have tried to clean the penny with aceton a couple of times, but there is no change. I showed it to our chemist, she also used aceton and she said it is no glue. She insisted that it is a metal, and probably, by looking at its color, she said it is copper. So, the questions is, if this copper is applied outside the mint before 2003 (the penny is in my coin collection eversince i left the USA in 2003), or at the mint?

          3. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hello, Kani —

            Hmm… This is very interesting news. I suppose at this point it might be worth swinging the coin by the folks at CONECA to see if they can examine the coin in-hand and provide an answer. Here is their info: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

            Thank you so much for the update,
            Josh

          4. Kani Kim Avatar
            Kani Kim

            Thank you Joshua. I will let u know their feedback.

          5. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            You’re most welcome, Kani!

            Best,
            Josh

      2. Kani Kim Avatar
        Kani Kim

        Hi Joshua,
        Thank you for your comment.
        I will try to take a pic day time n outside (at work now, n penny at home). The shiny part seems like and feels like extra metal poured accidentaly ie zinc or copper or sth else. I write, “feels like” because when you touch the obverse, you feel there is something on the penny even if you do not look at it. Same metal on the reverse side but https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dc0ef431ca4d2bbd0f33adadf43df8788f4efff9e949345135acc525cb8e6610.jpg is less and you do not feel with your finger-see the pic. As for your questions, I will check tomorrow n will write to you. Thank you.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Kani —

          Upon seeing these images, I think it may be an epoxy resin. I suggest safely dipping the coin in acetone (not necessarily nail polish, because it can contain other chemical elements that could ruin the coin). An acetone bath will remove the epoxy. If it doesn’t please let us know…

          Thank you, and good luck!
          Josh

      3. Kani Kim Avatar
        Kani Kim

        Here is the new pic of the penny. I tried to find an answer to your questions but not so sure. Maybe you can tell from the picture https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2cd586ca71dbda3a15078633092a1571c9207418e3f6e993ce1108a2ef5fb1f7.jpg

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Kani —

          Thank you for the clearer photo. I think it might be an epoxy resin that was applied to the coin after it left the Mint. If this is the case, an acetone bath (which I urge you to do very cautiously, since acetone is flammable and emits strong fumes) will remove that resin. If this doesn’t work, please let us know!

          Good luck!
          Josh

          1. Kani Kim Avatar
            Kani Kim

            OK, thank you Joshua….

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            You’re welcome, Kani!

  60. LeAnne Smith Avatar
    LeAnne Smith

    I have a few nickles that don’t have backs. I found tbem in a roll of nickles from the bank. Of course at different times. I can show pics if necessary.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, LeAnne —

      If you wouldn’t mind uploading photos of these nickels I’d appreciate it and am sure I could help you further.

      Thank you!
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, LeAnne —

          All four of these nickels have been machined smooth, which I can tell due to the heavy swirl marks on the plain sides. While these aren’t Mint-made rarities or worth more than face value, they are nevertheless unusual. Hold them aside if you find them interesting!

          Thank you for your question and great photos!

          Best wishes,
          Josh

      1. LeAnne Smith Avatar
        LeAnne Smith

        Are the pics good enough for you to see? If you need i can try to get better ones

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, LeAnne —

          Yes, I got the photos and they are great. I can tell the nickels were sanded clean by some type of grinding machine, due to swirl marks on plain sides of the coins.

          Thank you again for your questions and photos!

          Best wishes,
          -Josh

  61. RG Avatar
    RG

    Hi Joshua.
    I have this 1971 penny and the “1” appears to be much smaller than the rest of the date. In your opinion, is this considered an error?
    Thanks for your time.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/af24df9fca647b76c889b1061645cdc568978fcb4e545d3292f9904e7fe6d145.png

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, RG —

      It’s definitely not a 1974 or 1977 cent based on what I see in the photos… There is a little blob of metal on the lower right of the fourth digit. I tried zooming into the photo closer to see if there were any signs of post-Mint alterations. I couldn’t get the image large enough at a clear resolution to know for sure, but this looks very similar to several pennies that have altered dates. Without seeing the surface more closely I don’t want to say for sure that is what you have, but that’s what it looks like from what I see so far.

      At the very least, this coin is still worth at least twice its face value for its intrinsic copper value.

      Thank you for your question and photo!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, RG —

          I see some type of metal damage/blob to the right of the fourth digit. I think this is an altered coin, but if you want a second opinion to make sure you’re not missing out on something special I’d considered sending the image to CONECA for evaluation: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

          Best wishes,
          Josh

  62. Carrie Teague Avatar
    Carrie Teague

    I have a penny that is mis stamped and I was https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/df576400b13aff1bac7df1716376b492772ea13b157857ee1cd0dc7978ef27e5.jpg 5bd38370a60cd4787da2220ee27083f64cb328a7b42a12dd36bed5a09166cbc9.jpg wondering if it is worth anything?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Carrie!

      Nice off-center Lincoln cent! This one should be worth somewhere around $5 to $10.

      Great find,
      Josh

      1. Carrie Teague Avatar
        Carrie Teague

        Thank you.

  63. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
    Leah Greenwood-Collier

    Hi Joshua! Haven’t been on in a while been so busy lately! I’m still here though! Here’s a couple of coins for you!
    On the 1987 D penny the 8 and 7 have machine doubling?
    The 2011 penny seems to be some sort of die clash or something?
    And the best (imo) for last…my 1960 nickel die break? Notice just below his nose, running all the way down over his shoulder is a big crack…but then there’s another one just below his mouth that runs down below his jaw…then too, there is doubling on the bottom of the letters of LIBERTY and almost his whole profile of his face! Maybe the die broke and it caused it to bounce?? Thought you’d find it interesting. 🙂 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/28ae11ae3b494cbca7b9c87609e6e289e40abfd9f0066bd0a1c3e20cebaa3f1a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/60d38a6ced50ef84cbc6f042bf9175fc8b67b9610eead4cc53c8841af6b76f7a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/01679d5f930a95bd5a707fcc0dfe07d060521bc553c24a04f13e16572c19142d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/26596a9315a6f5cd16ac39c720037afbeb669de5c195c46c64abc2def3f042d8.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/584b1f73d92c808887cd016fe24de9c3707d564501e8a5b8ae2a3a8b1f2d9b5c.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bf70fc5ad241c68d0c5c8008a5eb360d5491f4432345e21a882a691727c04763.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Leah!

      It is good to hear from you again. It looks like you’ve like you’ve been no less busy. The 1987-D Lincoln cent appears to have machine doubling, which is actually very common on late-1980s Lincoln cents. Yes, I do see die clash indications just along the inside of the rim, and that’s likely worth about $ to $2 based on market conditions. The line across the obverse of the Jefferson nickel does look like a die break, and it looks like a significant one, in terms of location and size. I don’t know what the value of this piece would be only because any one type of die break isn’t commonly traded. However, I know some collectors would pay $5 to $10 or more for coins with major obverse die breaks.

      So glad to know you’re still enjoying the hobby and making some really neat finds. I look forward to seeing more of the coins you discover!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  64. Paul Avatar
    Paul

    1883 Liberty nickel with cents. Did someone remove the “cents” pic shows three coins, 1883 without, coin in question, and 1883 with cents. With all other markings definitely with cents variety but for some reason no word. I’m thinking I see trace of the word but don’t know if seeing things after looking so many times. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ce3aa19d49ee4536e427c548dddc5b927e919cb10d637d62b3d43800c0813a7e.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Paul!

      So glad to hear you’ve found The Fun Times Guide to Coins interesting! We’re glad to have you aboard. Hmm… I do see something of the word CENTS on the reverse of the middle nickel. Note, too, that area appears extra dark. I suspect that part of the coin has seen some type of post-Mint damage, and quite possibly was intentionally altered to obliterate the word CENTS from the coin. We could only speculate as to why, but perhaps someone wanted to pass this coin off for something apparently worth more than just five cents. Who knows?

      Based on what I see, your 1883 No Cents nickel is worth at least $7 to $10, and the 1883 With Cents on the right is valued at around $5 to $7 or so. Assuming the 1883 in question was altered post Mint, I’d put its value at around $3 to maybe $5.

      Thank you for your question,
      Josh

  65. Shawn N Opie Avatar
    Shawn N Opie

    Hey I found this quarter a long time ago I’m not sure if it a a mint error or not. Could you tell me where I can find out

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Shawn —

      The “P” was counterstamped some time ago by somebody outside of the Mint. If the origin of the “P” can be traced (such as, perhaps, to a store giveaway or as a makeshift token piece), it could be worth a small sum. Otherwise, I’d put its value at around $1 to $2, which is the value most coins such as this one sell for with unidentified counterstamps.

      Thank you for your question and photos,
      Josh

      1. Shawn N Opie Avatar
        Shawn N Opie

        Thank you

  66. Jennifer Wagner Kotrla Avatar
    Jennifer Wagner Kotrla

    Hi Joshua,
    I found this penny and I’ve been trying to find out if it is an error but can’t seem to find any information.
    Thanks!
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bf353e387329f8d514098a18c684f9e6682e96b290d3cfd5a78bf24d46e6709c.png

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jennifer —

      This is a neat-looking piece. This looks like an epoxy or resin impression of the reverse (tail’s side) of a Lincoln Memorial cent. Actually, such post-Mint impressions are relatively common, and in this case is further evidenced by what appears to be remnants of epoxy residue on other parts of this coin. In most cases, this can be verified by (safely) dipping the coin in pure acetone, which ordinarily removes glues and resins.

      I hope this info is helpful,
      Josh

      1. Jennifer Wagner Kotrla Avatar
        Jennifer Wagner Kotrla

        I’ll give that a try. Thank you!

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re welcome, Jennifer! I hope it works!

  67. Tracy Lamb Avatar
    Tracy Lamb

    Hi Joshua,
    I got this quarter as part of some change, not sure if someone changed it on purpose or if it is some kind of odd error.. ( if someone did it it will go along with my collection of smooshed pennies) https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5605662d5e536bbe27a154ee8cf2e53801248bc063eb71cb012c00924687bbb6.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/035dcdbe8115ae526399f151f54b6517c434841d866d4c8acb994b78f08b6148.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8e97a2e2e00856a96e79896e470b634fab0de37f1ed49e043ab14a4d9192cf23.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tracy —

      The reverse (or tail’s side) of this quarter has been machined, or sanded off. This is a post-Mint alteration that may have been performed for a number of reasons, including use as an illusionist’s coin or incorporated into a piece of jewelry. In either case, it’s worth at most 25 cents, though technically a coin with such extensive mutilation barely qualifies for use as legal tender and could be redeemed for scrap value under the Mint’s mutilated coin policy.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Tracy Lamb Avatar
        Tracy Lamb

        Thank you .. I had thought something of the sort, but it’s always worth asking.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Exactly, Tracy! And please don’t hesitate to ask us about other coins in the future. We’re always glad to help here.

          Take care,
          Josh

          1. Sidney Smith Avatar
            Sidney Smith

            Hi I was wondering if you could help me with these coins I have? I have

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Robert —

      Hmm… it’s hard to say if that coloration is due to toning or an issue with the planchet — the piece of metal the coin was struck from. Are you able to weigh the coin down to at least a tenth of a gram? If so, what does it weigh, please?

      Thank you,
      Josh

      1. Robert Kesling Avatar
        Robert Kesling

        Same weight, 8.1G on my beam scale. I have had some say it plated but some of the “dents” from dropping it do not show any gold color of the base metal. Odd. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e7e526927348889395fdf6843c64a0f3b227342b3fd68a6027893db8da5af4ea.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Allison —

      Based on what I see with the grooves on the planed surface, type of cuts, and straight lines, this 2016 Cumberland Gap quarter appears to have suffered some extreme post-Mint damage. At best, its worth face value though it’s possible it would be rejected by coin-operated vending machines.

      Thank you for your question — and keep on searching!

      Best,
      Josh

      1. Allison Bieniek Avatar
        Allison Bieniek

        Thank you for responding! I’m curious what happened to this coin. On the side where part of the image is missing, the surface is very smooth and shiny.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Emil —

      Admittedly, I’m not as familiar with coins from certain regions of the world as I am with U.S., Canadian, and British coinage. I believe the bottom coin, which shows weak surface details, may be a die trial piece; such coins are known for having very weak overall detail as die pressure was being adjusted and thus tested on planchets. The other pieces show rim anomalies that may or may not be errors or varieties.

      I suggest you send these images to CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      They are the undisputed experts in die varieties and may have familiarity with certain errors or varieties known among the 5 Kronur coins of the era.

      Good luck!
      Josh

      1. Emil Phoryew Avatar
        Emil Phoryew

        Thank you Josh. I will do that.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Marua —

      This is definitely an error coin, and it looks like possibly a multi-strike error — note part of the rim is missing on the right side of the coin as well. These can be worth $5 to $10 or more.

      Very nice find!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      This piece has been severely worn — it appears the high spots were worn down, perhaps intentionally, and have exposed the coin’s zinc inner core (which is why it appears lighter in some areas). It looks like this damage happened many years ago. The coin is worth face value, but it’s nevertheless unusual.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  68. Allison Bieniek Avatar
    Allison Bieniek

    I found this 1975 dime that appears to have either a few errors or major wear and tear. I was wondering if you could tell me what the possibilities are. In the pictures below, I have the dime in question on the left hand side next to a 1975 dime that is in good condition for comparison. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9cb34d7be775a90cb9a76cad3cb60ede1a9f83373c5d7c57d29ce96dfbb5a74c.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/70d5e58f5bfabb3a947dc35a9463a87c93299a439453a9426f8566af9f291831.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Allison —

      Aww, poor 1975 Roosevelt dime… It’s lived a very hard 42 years. The oddities on this coin that you see are all post-Mint damage. The coin is worth face value, but I’m sure it’s life story is one I’d pay more than a dime to hear.

      Best,
      Josh

  69. Allison Bieniek Avatar
    Allison Bieniek

    I just came across a bicentennial quarter that is in excellent shape, so much so, that I’m wondering if this coin holds a substantial value or not. I have placed the coin in excellent condition next to another bicentennial to show the remarkable difference. Any input would be great! Thank you. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/637562bc58661fd93f292676f3653ef2ac8a12e7486863fe11d44dd9fb80136f.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0b0a4283c5b6f778b9cfedb859748b48f3f262f1e770f86e50f8f64be3124384.jpg

  70. Tammy Atwood Avatar
    Tammy Atwood

    Hi Joshua
    I was wondering if you could tell me about the errors on this 1952 penny well they seem like errors to me id say double die if you need better pics let me know and I will try to get them I don’t think I got a very clear pic of the back but it also looks like there’s some double die on it if these are errors what do you think the value would be https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ba714beab634833c605ffb12930485d0187a8dbfee981fa0a88b3566f2436ad7.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2b710f872f30cc02a652bbfcdf60cce765ca860ccc0f500733792c4ec5d41969.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/134327bcb6494e7cfbd47bf734fb63cf68fcae950f75bef398535870427f7aa8.jpg

  71. Allison Bieniek Avatar
    Allison Bieniek

    I’m happy to hear that it appears to be uncirculated. Thanks for the info!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      You’re welcome, Allison!

      1. Allison Bieniek Avatar
        Allison Bieniek

        Did you happen to see the dime I posted a few posts back? I’m curious about it as well.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Allison —

          I just replied a moment ago!

          Take care,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      Hmm,yes, that 1983 cent is definitely 3/10ths of a gram too heavy, yet not heavy enough to suggest it’s an off-metal transitional error with copper base. If this consistently checks out at 2.8 grams it might be worth having examined by a 3rd-party coin-grading firm. Here’s more info about those services: https://uscoinsguide.com/slabbed_coins/

      Good luck,
      Josh

      1. Robert Avatar
        Robert

        OK, I’ll have it examined. THANKS for the help

  72. Patricia Keeton Avatar
    Patricia Keeton

    Hi Josh,
    First off, I want to thank you for sharing your time and knowledge.
    I have a 1986 D zinc penny that weighs 2.5 grams and it is missing the outer copper layer. I believe this is a true mint error because of the coins detail. I am seeking your opinion to help me decide if I should have it examined and possibly graded?
    Photos attached and thanks again for your service.
    Patty K. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b018ef13e36e5eaa79fd30ab1c5ecba22b306db89295e5d2eea8d6899a839af5.jpg
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7ef4c69a82bd1add346a389b59f9507c89b4a03f698413d65af0f9a670fb3a87.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/56161eef88c6cd02caefe548b01179e59ff654ee722d474b11ca512e5a25a949.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b62fea50bbd8b4d4d9bf3b7192b6d50d1f81d69a5c0968bfe15531d72119d832.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b1b30c8b7379224157112f3ca1af650549456f74f9667882cf6976318c47c89b.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Patricia —

      This one’s interesting…. It’s hard to say in absence of a lighting source I can verify if this is toning or, more likely, the coin’s zinc showing through. I’m inclined to say, based on the way the zinc core is shaded into the copper coating at the coin’s perimeter, that this coin may have had a chemical treatment of some sort. If this were an error, in almost every likelihood, the entire copper coating would be absent. Without seeing the coin in-hand, I believe this is a post-Mint alteration but by all means feel free to pass this by someone else for a second, in-hand opinion.

      Here’s some info on finding a good coin dealer: https://uscoinsguide.com/coin_dealer/
      And a great coin variety database, with experts who officially attribute errors: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Good luck!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Very nice, Robert! I think this one is worth passing by the folks at CONECA for (hopefully) an official attribution.

      CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      From what I see in these images, this appears to be surface staining or discoloration. Without seeing the coin in-hand I can’t say for certain. It might be worth passing these images by the folks at CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Good luck,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      Hmm… this is very interesting, especially in that it’s seen on three different coins in the same position. Is the line sunken or raised?

      Thanks for any followup you can provide,
      Josh

      1. Robert Avatar
        Robert

        The Lines Are sunken

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Robert —

          Hm…. Usually, sunken lines indicate post-Mint damage, but they might be worth checking out further. The best resource for a second opinion on potential varieties or errors is CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

          Good luck,
          Josh

          1. Robert Avatar
            Robert

            Thank you

  73. Matt Avatar
    Matt

    Hi Josh.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      I do see what looks like raised elements, or die gouges. These are collectible, though as for value that is determined based on the demand for a particular effect. Oftentimes, the value is just a few dollars, which may not justify getting these coins certified and slabbed — something that usually costs $15 to $20 or more each, minimum. You might confirm these are die gouges by sending them to John Wexler, who I *think* charges only $5 or so per coin for attribution. Here’s his info: https://www.doubleddie.com/

      Good luck!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Ashley —

      From what I can tell in the photos, the darkness and otherwise odd surfaces on this Roosevelt dime are caused by environmental damage. Assuming this to be the case, it’s worth face value.

      Thank you for your question and for posting the helpful image!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  74. Paul Ramey Avatar
    Paul Ramey

    Hello my friend, and thank you for your attention in advance.
    I was going through my coin collection recently, and noticed this one 1983 kennedy half dollar with very sharp, overlapping, raised serrations around the edge protruding on the tail side of the coin
    I was only curious if this would have any collectible appeal?

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a0df7fbf38ae27c919565a98e692df649ad42df078151eb5c6cd5343ae75f1ac.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/81790f57a13c930d9a755d31ff05fa8ce1dca74ede9898507c8d1e0dc05a09e2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/50f02b922aecc377121f3c6c7d8a4fde6a1dd2b6e75355b8e00091d42e98de9d.jpg .

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Paul —

      Hmm… this could be caused by a collar issue, or perhaps very strong strike pressure, but I’m not sure. It may have also been due to post-Mint damage — the edge of the coin squeezed inward by blunt pressure, thus pushing the edge reeding upward. I suggest you swing these photos by the folks at coin variety and error group CONECA. They can probably provide a better explanation in this instance.

      Here’s their info: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Breanna —

      Hmm… The coin definitely appears authentic, but I believe, based on the mottled appearance of its surface, that this coin may have been exposed to a very caustic agent, perhaps even acid of some type. This would explain the pitted surface (at least, it appears pitted in the photo). The edge, too, appears to have been affected, eating away at some of the reeding. It’s worth face value, but this coin might be fun to hang on to since it appears so unusual.

      Cool find!
      Josh

      1. Breanna Pickard-embry Avatar
        Breanna Pickard-embry

        If you fell it it feels like a rail road track, like how the wheels of a train are made that’s how the quarter is, and its a PERFECT LINE in the middle of the rim, like 2 quarters where put togetherish… https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b726ae2499c16e1bf3a4fa1dbcb339d29ad281833b80f51571f9841da8648328.jpg

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Breanna —

          The copper part is grooved? This isn’t evident (at least to me!) in the photo, but that seems to describe a piece that has been altered post-Mint. An anomaly like that wouldn’t have been really been possible at the Mint due to coin preparation and striking procedures as they are, save for some highly unusual error in processing within the collar (which creates the reeded edge, or milling, when the coin is struck. While I’m very confident this is indeed a post-Mint alteration, if you would like, you could get a second opinion from the folks at CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

          Interesting find to say the least!
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Annemarie!

      Yes, many folks do gold plate coins as keepsakes, and many private mints have done the same thing. The bottom line is that it’s not a Mint error, and the gold is worth only 1 or 2 cents. Essentially, this coin is worth face value from the monetary standpoint, though if I had found it I’d keep it aside as a novelty anyway… You just don’t find gold-plated quarters every day!

      Cool find!
      Josh

  75. Angel Barclay Avatar
    Angel Barclay

    Yes maybe you can help me i found a 1990 dime that looks like the re https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/36ad37700450354183cb60469f5a10708313889143e4ffda108fa5d612918994.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/647645085a570cb6f5eb0217b1f07b6e501cef8bb3857b09eb753f9b22e27c0d.jpg verse side was all messed up but not one scratch on the from is it by chance a actual error

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Angel —

      This piece was unfortunately altered post Mint. I can tell you why I know this for two reasons:

      A — Those deep cuts on the reverse of the dime
      B — The weakness on the reverse could have been indicative of a rare die trial, if not for the fact that the center of the coin has normal circulated details and the obverse of the coin is normal

      So, based on the photos, this is a damaged (but otherwise normal) circulated copper-nickel clad Roosevelt dime that’s worth face value.

      Thank you for question and photos!
      Josh

  76. Caleb Underkoffler Avatar
    Caleb Underkoffler
    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hey, Caleb —

      I think I see a ridge or bump where the arrow is pointing but I think the image is kind of fuzzy on my end here. If you can, would you mind re-taking the photo in a way where the reverse of the coin is just a bit clearer, please?

      Thank you so much!
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Ah, nice, Caleb!

          While a little blurry still (these coin pics are VERY hard to take, I can tell you…) this is a much better photo. I think that spot on the right wheat stalk may have been caused by something called a die break. That means part of the design on the die, which stamps designs onto blank coins (called planchets), may have chipped away, causing a blank, elevated design element. I can’t say for sure without seeing the coin either in-person or in a really close-up, sharp photo of the affected area. However, if this is what I mention above, the coin is probably worth $1 to $2 to someone who collects those types of errors. Hang on to it at least until you can get the coin further inspected.

          Cool find!
          Josh

          1. Caleb Underkoffler Avatar
            Caleb Underkoffler

            Thank you

  77. Maddie plays Games Avatar
    Maddie plays Games

    Hi, Josh. I have a nickel with raised edges, and a dime with a smooth copper and silver rim. Can you advise? Thanks in advance! I’ve replied to this post with the pictures. Kind regards

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Maddie —

      Hmm… The rim on the Jefferson nickel has seen better days and appears damaged. Would you mind posting a clear shot, straight-on, of the Roosevelt dime, please? I’ll see if I can advise on that coin, which may have been centrifuged in a dryer, upsetting the edge, but I can’t tell for sure in the photos I’ve seen so far of that coin.

      Thank you for your questions and photos,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Maddie —

          Thank you for sending the image. I’m afraid the photo is a little blurry on my end but it appears the rim may have been centrifugally upset post-Mint, perhaps by rolling around inside a dryer or another type of machine — this is, perhaps surprisingly to some, a common post-Mint circumstance for a lot of coins. Presuming this is what happened to this dime, it’s worth face value.

          Thank you for your question!
          Josh

        2. Matt Avatar
          Matt

          Hi Maddie.

  78. Sherry Hogan Avatar
    Sherry Hogan

    a friend found a 1959 penny,,we think,,can u look and tell us what u think tia cant seem to upload a pic tho

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Sherry —

      Without seeing a photo I can’t say for sure, but I can tell you that circulated 1959 Lincoln cents are worth 2 cents each for their copper value. If you can upload a photo (by clicking on the rectangular icon under the comment box — JPEG files work well) I’d be happy to take a look.

      Thank you!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      Yes, I think these are worth getting checked, because I think what you have here are coins with die chips/die breaks. If so, and I believe that’s the case based on what I see in the photos, they could be worth something substantial over face value IF the varieties are verified and garner some attention in the numismatic media.

      You could send photos of this dime to the variety experts at CONECA and see what they say. Here’s a link to their website: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Good luck!
      Josh

  79. Michael Davis Avatar
    Michael Davis

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3f54fd662863777099eab80e5df0c727d2bb780ec60fdee8e6e70de98b9b2594.jpg

    Hello,

    I found a 1983 D with what looks like a die crack, a visable ‘8’ over something, and the ‘D’ double but off center stamped obverse.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Michael —

      This almost looks like a strike-through error. The squiggly line could be cloth, though it’s hard to say for certain. I suggest you send this image to the folks at CONECA for a second opinion and to ensure it’s a strike-through and not post-Mint damage. Here’s CONECA’s link: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Good luck,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Tammy —

      This coin has experienced some heavy post-Mint damage, as seen in the gouges and hits on the obverse and reverse; this has lent to an unusual wear pattern, too. This piece is worth face value.

      Thank you for your question,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Robert —

      The “O” around the stamp looks like a normal impression of the edge lettering device, but the “D,” while I believe is a similar type of anomaly as the “O/I” issue also mentioned here, surely does look like a distinct “D,” doesn’t it? On that, I’m going to suggest submitting the coin to CONECA for a second opinion as they are the variety experts in the hobby.

      Here’s their website: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Good luck!
      Josh

  80. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
    Leah Greenwood-Collier

    Hello Joshua! Long time no see! Don’t worry, I won’t leave for good. Lol I’ve just had a lot going on. So I’ll have a few different posts. I have two different coins for this post, they’re both 1989 d Lincoln cents. The first one no big deal there’s a lot of machine doubling on the date especially, and there are four pictures of it. But on the second coin; check out the LIBE in Liberty especially on the obverse, and again there’s some machine doubling on the date. Then on the reverse, would you look at the E and R in America?! I understand the first coin is machine doubling, also that 89 d doubling isn’t a variety, but I just had to see what you’d say. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ed7a68c6707ec09f02b8f3cd47d91ee4bf6c13ee0b44891e15390ad550064f40.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b7d6827fe5f1e697438298b93e98237369956677642b931bccb0937c6f59a5d2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1cfddfd9ea3759b831f21a39fb50c665e5346801ff8b60a0179bfc4725863b44.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/cd6cea2b6a1a081b6dfd1e1ed8185f2eaeb654f1e0d0d6ec09f1d50ea6e14a7b.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4f5908000ce96b2959bec76aeac24cfbde9dba396103eca7fedc004b53fa84f2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6135fe739808404642a49bd73879c4e5c43bc6b37b2aaf500c4e6c27a501419a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1cfddfd9ea3759b831f21a39fb50c665e5346801ff8b60a0179bfc4725863b44.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/51e15e95f7a4913c365e7353bc784a31f59b65f268ce8ca51553fb0c3af74404.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/50696d895d683acb3422da731305d795d6dac6a663f08e74434590cd670a2e14.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hey, Leah!

      It’s good to hear from you! I think you’re right about the first 1989-D — I think it exhibits evidence of machine doubling. But the second coin seems to have some distinct die issues. What’s exciting is that it appears the IBE have distinct, stair-step doubling, or at least that what’s I see in the photo. I hope this is the case, because that would ordinarily indicate much more than simple machine doubling. I think you should definitely pass the photo by variety expert John Wexler or CONECA. Here are their links:

      CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm
      John Wexler: https://doubleddie.com/

      I’m crossing some fingers for you,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Awesome, Leah! It certainly looks like a beautiful clipped planchet! These are generally worth $5 to $10, though often more — and this piece looks like it’s uncirculated to boot.

          Keep up whatever it is that you’re doing, my friend!
          -Josh

          1. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
            Leah Greenwood-Collier

            Okay, I will! 🙂 I emailed John Wexler and sent him the pictures of my coin. We’ll see if I hear anything back from him. It’s difficult not yo get your hopes up, but I have tell myself it’s probably nothing, because you know how it is when a person gets all excited just to find out they were wrong. I’m really glad to have you yo run things by, because some of the collectors on some of the sites you can join are down right mean. Good thing I’m so tenacious! Lol!

            Leah

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Leah, I’m really excited to find out what John says! Yes, it’s frustrating when a coin we think is a rare variety is just post-mint damage or the like. But, that’s how we learn to identify errors and varieties versus damage and that helps us grow as collectors.

            I’m looking forward to the next update!
            Josh

          3. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
            Leah Greenwood-Collier

            Hi Joshua. I got an email from John Wexler about the 1989 Lincoln cent, this is what he said.
            “From your photos it looks like the doubling might be a case of what the Mint calls plating buckling, however, I would have to sdee the coin itself to say anything definitively.”
            So does that mean if it is plating buckling it’s worth face value? I’m going to keep it just on the fact I actually got an email from John Wexler about it! Lol I tried looking up this plating buckling and couldn’t find anything about it. Then there IS the possibility it isn’t that…
            Looking forward to hearing from you.
            Leah

          4. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Leah!

            Hmm… I’m not sure if the plate buckling would be worth much above face value; I’ve not heard much about plate buckling and I can’t tell if there is much market demand for such pieces. I’d actually suggest sending the coin along anyway just to get his verification and see what he says, if the inspection fee (I think $4? Maybe more nowadays?) and postage isn’t too much for you to handle. If nothing else, it might be worth the cost just to get his explanation, if he provides any further clues. That’s my 2 cents, anyway!

            Good luck!
            Josh

          5. Leah Greenwood-Collier Avatar
            Leah Greenwood-Collier

            Thank you Joshua! I have a couple of other coins I’d like to send in, and have the packaging to do it, so I may just do that sometime soon!

            Leah

          6. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            You’re welcome, Leah! I’m so looking forward to hearing any news you find out!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert!

      Nice find — this looks like a repunched mintmark. Here’s more info about them: https://www.varietyvista.com/05%20JN%20RPMs/RPMs%201964D.htm

      Many of these are worth $1 to $3 or more.

      Cool find!
      Josh

  81. Robert Avatar
    Robert

    Hi Joshua, I found a 1993p dime with a well placed die clash mark in t https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7249042da0a77e2f2570a841074a0ef24a8cb25b288ebd39de2302a5694fa5c3.jpg he mouth of Roosevelt. It gives him a bucktooth, I know clashes aren’t worth much but this one is interesting. What do you think? Again thanks for all your help

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hmmm, Robert —

      I think this might be worth sending off to CONECA for possible attribution. Here’s their info: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Cool find!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      Nice find! I’m pretty confident the issue with this coin have to do with a weak strike and not simply wear-related problems, but my question is if this is a die trial strike or something else. I suggest sending these photos to the variety experts at CONECA and see if they can confirm, as die trials are often worth $25 or more.

      Here’s CONECA’s info: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Fingers crossed!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Good morning, Robert —

      Hmm… This one is stumping me. Ordinarily it looks like it would be an issue with porosity — possibly caused by an acid bath. However, the appearance of cracks on the reverse, the color, and the weight lea me to wonder if this might be (unlikely) possibly a wrong planchet error — a cent struck on a silver dime planchet. I have my doubts, but the aforementioned opens up that remote possibility. I suggest sending these images to John Wexler or the folks at CONECA for a second expert opinion.

      John Wexler: https://doubleddie.com/
      CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      I’m crossing my fingers for you…
      -Josh

  82. Glen Belfon Avatar
    Glen Belfon

    I have in my possession a us nickel that looks like a copper coin.2004p all copper,is this possible.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Glen —

      While anything is possible, this is unlikely. I’d love to see a photo of this coin so I can help determine what may have happened to it. It’s possible that it’s a regular, but discolored, nickel, but won’t know until I can look at it.

      Thank you!
      Josh

  83. Robert Jones Avatar
    Robert Jones

    I have a 1983 quarter but it looks like a error on the date of it

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      Do you have a photo of this error that you can post here?

      Thanks!
      Josh

      1. Matt Avatar
        Matt

        your so ugly your not even worth face value

      2. Matt Avatar
        Matt

        your so ugly your not even worth face value!

      3. Matt Avatar
        Matt

        your so ugly your not even worth face value

      4. Matt Avatar
        Matt

        josh your so ugly your not even worth face value

      5. Bryan Avatar

        your so ugly ur not even worth face value… XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

  84. jacob_pro x Avatar
    jacob_pro x

    My nickel is better than all the rest Joshua! TELL ME HOW MUCH IS IS WORTHHH!!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi there, Jacob!

      I’d love to see a photo of this nickel… Then I can give you a better idea on what it’s worth!

      Thank you,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Awesome coin, Jacob! This is a double-struck error. Values are all over the board for these based on the individual coin, but I’ve seen similar pieces sell for $150 to $200 and even more.

          Great find!
          -Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Edward —

      Yes, this is an altered piece — two real coins involved (a Washington quarter and Kennedy half dollar) that were joined together. While this coin has no numismatic value, it’s an interesting piece that may be worth a dollar or two to someone who collects novelty coins.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  85. tony21953 Avatar
    tony21953

    i have a 1969S mint set in which the penny looks odd. It has unusual lines running in different directions over pretty much the entire face. the rear of the penny looks normal. the lines almost look like finger prints.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tony –

      Would you please submit a photo of this coin so I can further assist you?

      Thank you,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tony —

      These look like discoloration marks and perhaps even fingerprints… It’s possible this coin was improperly handled at the US Mint or even was placed in the set to replace another example (probably one removed by a collector). At any rate, this is a decent proof 1969-S cent worth about 75 cents to $1.

      Thank you for your question and photo!
      Josh

  86. tony21953 Avatar
    tony21953

    Thank you for your time!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      You’re welcome, Tony!
      -Josh

  87. charlotte boyer Avatar
    charlotte boyer

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/95a1e0353d80233b5588b01e22909f32112323c75322ee1e121ef9e93d0f85bb.jpg Hi Josh,

    I just found this 1959 penny and it looks like the “Liberty” and some of the “In God We Trust” is up too close to the edge. Just wanted to know if that’s something you’ve seen. Also the edging on the top is much thinner than the bottom. Would love to know your thoughts!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Charlotte —

      It looks like I see a minimal machine doubling in the letters, though I can’t be sure in this photo. Such pieces are sometimes worth a very small amount over face value, especially if a specific example has collector demand. This piece looks interesting; I’d probably hang on to it if I were you.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  88. Daron Petrea Avatar
    Daron Petrea

    Is this a mint error? You can see part of the reverse side of the coin is showing on the front side. Looks more as a period of time with the back of one coin laying upon another under some sort of pressure in some sort of conditions unknown. What do you think? Would it be possible for one side to be stamped on the other side from mint? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/63731ee36905eb8080b3b98e8fa8c1d7fd58e66921ab305306204c672b41f7af.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2ae0a354894a3acef8e18fc3d765605d7e5ae85431fcb3364deeb8d08aab8a72.jpg
    The seller was asking 400 dollars. Skeptical that this is a mint error and /or its worth.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Daron —

      It’s hard to say for sure from the photo, but it looks like the impression may have actually been made in some type of glue residue. You could know for sure by safely soaking the coin in acetone for 30 seconds to 1 minute; if it’s glue residue, it will come right off the obverse of the Lincoln cent.

      Very interesting…
      Josh

  89. Betty McCardle Avatar
    Betty McCardle

    I have a dime without a face. There is silver barely outlining the head but nothing else but a copper from the middle on the front. The front is perfectly smooth. The back is normal.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Betty —

      Would you please post a photo of this dime?

      Thank you so much,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Betty —

          While the photo is a but grainy, I seem to see some heavy lines across the surface of this piece. This suggests to me that the coin may have been altered outside of the Mint and Roosevelt’s face thus removed. If you might be able to kindly upload a clearer photo I would be happy to take a second look.

          Thank you,
          Josh

      1. Betty McCardle Avatar
        Betty McCardle

        The little piece in the upper right is not part of coin. Not sure how it go there. The top of coin is completely slick, it was done by a machine.

  90. Sam Cregut Avatar
    Sam Cregut

    Hi Joshua I’ve been going through my paps coins and found this is this something to hold on to? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8b3ef2e248c58e84cb30c43adaeada8b23f09152b34c5712461a9555af54d2d7.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Sam —

      Ooh, yes! Do keep this. It’s an error penny. It was struck way off center and is worth about $7 to $10.

      Nice find,
      Josh

      1. Sam Cregut Avatar
        Sam Cregut

        Thank you! I have so many coins not sure where to begin any suggestions?

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hey, Sam —

          Let’s say you start by looking through all of your United States coins. I have a link here that will help you find out the most valuable coins for the six major current denominations, cent through dollar: https://uscoinsguide.com/us-coins/

          I hope you have some of the coins listed in the directory! Please let me know if you have any more questions or thoughts about your coins.

          Good luck,
          Josh

  91. Marshall Price Avatar
    Marshall Price

    Hi Joshua, I just found a penny that has been re-stamped front on back and back on front. Where do I go with that? You can see the pillars from the back lightly on the front and Lincolns head outline on the back. What do you suggest I do?

    thank you
    mp

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Marshall —

      It looks like you have a very nice die clash! If you’re looking to sell it, you’ll want to take the coin to a coin dealer who specializes in error coins. Do a Google search for “error coin dealers” and bear in mind that many will still offer to buy your coin if you send it in. Just be sure you deal with a reputable coin dealer. Here are some tips for finding one: https://uscoinsguide.com/coin_dealer/

      Best wishes,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hello, Dalia —

          Given that you’re finding doubling on both sides of the coin, it’s likely to be a case of machine doubling, which happens when the dies get worn while striking coins. Such issues are usually associated with little to no extra premium. If you want a second opinion, I recommend kindly submitting these photos to the error and variety experts at CONECA: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

          Good luck!
          Josh

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hello, Dalia —

            I’m not too sure, based on the images I see, if the 1969-S Lincoln penny is a doubled die, but I think you’ll find this article helpful: https://uscoinsguide.com/1969-penny-value/

            As for the 1946-S Lincoln cent, it’s worth about 5 to 10 cents.

            Cool finds,
            Josh

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Dalia —

            I will need more information about this coin please, including:
            1. What year Susan B. Anthony dollar is this? What mintmark?
            2. What are you trying to show me in this image? I.E., what is unusual about this part of the coin? Sometimes things that one might see on the coin before their very eyes won’t be immediately clear in a photo.

            I’ll certainly be happy to help further if you can kindly fill in some of the gaps!

            Thank you so much, and have a great day —
            -Josh

          3. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Dalia —

            These coins all appear to be normal varieties; the ones that weigh 3.0 or 3.1 grams are copper and, as these are worn, the copper varieties are worth 2 cents each for their metal content.

            Nice finds!
            Josh

  92. Brian LaFalce Avatar
    Brian LaFalce

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/da268f4c1d7b5841e29c16234456063406975bfd971de409775964a51c49a8f0.jpg

    What’s going on here? Penny with the mint mark in the bottom of a crater. Kind of looks like someone took a punch to the penny, but the d is present at the bottom.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Brian —

      It looks like someone took a drill to your 1986 cent, probably to drill into it and while protecting another surface under the coin. This piece is worth face value.

      Thank you for your question — and interesting picture!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Sue!

      Cool — it looks like this coin was toned through some sort of chemical immersion. This definitely happened outside of the U.S. Mint. There are individuals who pay more for toned coins, but the question is how much will they pay for a piece like this, which was probably intentionally dipped to achieve this unique effect?

      You might consider listing the coin on eBay if you’re interested in selling it and see what it gets for bidding action.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Sue Crume Kent Avatar
        Sue Crume Kent

        Josh,  this coin is only this way on the front.  The back is normal.  Any idea how someone could do this on the front only?ThanksSue

        Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
        ——– Original message ——–From: Disqus Date: 10/24/17 4:39 AM (GMT-08:00) To: sekent48@gmail.com Subject: Re: Comment on Have Error Coins? Here’ s How To Tell A Normal Or Altered Coin From A Real Error Coin
        “Hi, Sue!

        Cool — it looks like this coin was toned through some sort of chemical immersion. This definitely happened outside of the U.S. Mint. There are individuals who pay more for toned coins, but the question is how much will they pay for a piece like this, which was probably intentionally dipped to achieve this unique effect?
        You might consider listing the coin on eBay if you’re interested in selling it and see what it gets for bidding action.
        Best wishes,
        Josh”

        Settings

        A new comment was posted on U.S. Coin Guide

        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Sue!Cool — it looks like this coin was toned through some sort of chemical immersion. This definitely happened outside of the U.S. Mint. There are individuals who pay more for toned coins, but the question is how much will they pay for a piece like this, which was probably intentionally dipped to achieve this unique effect?You might consider listing the coin on eBay if you’re interested in selling it and see what it gets for bidding action.Best wishes, Josh

        7:39 a.m., Tuesday Oct. 24

        |

        Other comments by JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Reply

        to JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide’s comment is in reply to

        Sue Crume Kent:

        Joshua, h https://uploads.disquscdn.c… ave you ever seen a penny like this? Read more

        You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to sekent48.

        You can unsubscribe
        from emails about replies to sekent48
        by replying to this email with “unsubscribe”
        or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by
        adjusting your notification settings.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hello, Sue —

          I didn’t realize that the front was the only side affected, but nevertheless a one-sided toning aberration is still achievable either through intentional chemical application or naturally by placing part of the head’s side (obverse) of the coin upon a surface covered with chemicals — for example, the penny may have been partially laying on the unused strip of an envelope flap with adhesive… that’s just one of many scenarios where partial toning like this could have happened.

          At any rate, the colorful toning is post-Mint and will only add value to the coin if a collector is willing to pay for a piece with that specific type of toning. There are many folks out there who might pay a small premium for a Lincoln cent with that type of toning.

          I hope this info is helpful!
          Josh

  93. Steve Tyranski Avatar
    Steve Tyranski

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0d1f24638aa5e717115a5a591cf177a6dd59a833639d0cd844ac12f731f0d1ba.jpg Hello. I thought this 1942 penny was unique in the way the date is stamped. Your thoughts? Any value?

    Thanks for your help, Steve

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Steve —

      It looks like something hit the “1” in the date; this is definitely some type of post-Mint damage. Here’s more info on the value of 1942 pennies: https://uscoinsguide.com/rare_wheat_pennies/

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  94. Tammy Atwood Avatar
    Tammy Atwood

    Hi Josh
    I was wondering if you could tell me if this is an error in this1980 penny or whatever the n on the word in looks like an m https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ce1ec91a6068dc86d19651645a07bae93c552f0223b8804f051bdea9ad14722d.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      It looks like the “N” in “IN” has some moderate post-Mint damage resulting in the right part of the “N” being displaced. This 1980 penny is still worth 2 cents for its intrinsic copper value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  95. Tammy Atwood Avatar
    Tammy Atwood

    Hi Josh
    I have another question I have a 1917 wheat penny on the rim it looks like there is the letter g what is it https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c220fbb6420fdbe329e6ede24818d2538e086b68f38e3b5a0cbb8662ca63e3d5.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      Actually, this is a regular 1919 Lincoln cent with heavy wear and possibly a light rim bump which, when worn flat, will look like a bulge. The “L” in “LIBERTY” is also heavily worn, though this is a normal wear trait for this coin. I’d value this piece at about 10 to 15 cents. It’s a nice -looking coin with a lot of honest wear and nice, original color.

      Cool find,
      Josh

  96. Tammy Atwood Avatar
    Tammy Atwood

    Hi Josh
    I have this 1981 penny to me it seems like it’s off centered https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/df4ee1f1789a67f111b49e0e5b777e62346ef48c493477bdf99122aa7f411029.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      This 1981 penny is indeed off center, but it’s only a few percent off-center. Normally, an off-center strike has to get to about 10 percent or more for it to really garner any value as an error coins. Therefore, this piece is not necessarily going to fetch any extra money. You’ll be glad to know this piece is worth 2 cents — double its face value — due to the coin’s copper value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tammy —

      This 1998 Lincoln cent does have some extensive obverse wear/damage, but I’m not sure if that’s why some of the lettering on the obverse is nearly obliterated. It seems like it may have a strike weakness. I’m inclined to say it might be a late die state on the obverse, but I’m not positive because Lincoln’s head shows relatively strong detail. Plus there is the presence of heavy marks leads me to wonder if the coin suffered some type of concentric post-Mint damage/wear — very possible. I actually suggest sending these photos to the die variety experts at CONECA to see if they might be able to provide a second opinion.

      Here’s their info: https://varietyvista.com/index.htm

      Good luck, and thank you for reaching out!
      -Josh

  97. duane bass Avatar
    duane bass

    HEY JOSHUA
    his looks like an error coin. . . What do you think? Please reply, if you need to to dlbapple@Icloud.com https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/234f41536309d9d8229ea66983f51c4994d2af2203eb26f2442505a33399f11f0.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Duane!

      I’m afraid I don’t see a photo of the coin you’re asking about. Would you mind kindly uploading the image again please so I can assist further?

      Thank you!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Kevin —

      Interesting find! The “S” is actually a post-Mint counterstamped feature. Who knows why someone stamped it there, but it looks like it may have been placed on the coin by a business, perhaps to use the coin as a coupon or token. These pieces actually have carry some interest with exonumia/novelty coin collectors. There isn’t a “book value,” per se, for your piece, but I’ve seen similar ones sell for 50 cents to $1. If we only knew who exactly put it there (for example, a particular business), it could be worth even more to those collectors.

      I’d either keep it for now if I were you… Or sell it to an exonumia collector. But whatever you do, don’t spend it at face value!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Kevin Sandgren Avatar
        Kevin Sandgren

        Thank you for your reply, I do collect penny’s and other coins and this one barely caught my eye.I was hoping it was that once in a lifetime rare San Francisco coin Sincerely,Kevin “S”

  98. David Czerniak Avatar
    David Czerniak

    Hello Josh I have a 1920 penny that clearly has an extra edge all the way around !! This is for sure not from being used ? Can you help ? It also has some lamination issues !! And can clearly see a gap between the penny and the edge on the backside !!

        1. David Czerniak Avatar
          David Czerniak

          ???

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, David —

        That extra edge is actually a jewelry mount. I’ve seen many, many coins with a very similar mount — it really does look like a part of the coin! This piece is worth the value of the coin itself, which in this case is about 10 cents.

        Nearly an antique! Nice find…

        Best wishes,
        Josh

        1. David Czerniak Avatar
          David Czerniak

          Lol thank you !! Guess I’ll get rich another way !!

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Ha ha, you’re welcome, David! I hope you do!

            Cheers,
            Josh

  99. Matt Mott Avatar
    Matt Mott

    – https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9c5109d586e7069b51b6dc9213eef6d4af035380850e8ff57d6fbfe7dd9a5e81.jpg
    I found a coin where the E looks like it crossed the top like a T

    Any info?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Matt —

      That looks like a tiny die break. There’s no “book value,” per se, on such a variety, but many such pieces are worth anywhere from $3 to $10, sometimes even more. If you want, send the photo to the error and die variety experts at CONECA for further confirmation and perhaps a better idea on its value. Here’s their info: https://varietyvista.com/

      Cool find!
      Josh

  100. Cyndi Reis Loun Avatar
    Cyndi Reis Loun

    Hi Josh, my name is Cindy and i got a quarter many years ago from our local store. I noticed it was kind of light in weight. When i looked at it i notice it has no side edging at all. here are some pictures. i can take more if needed.

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Cyndi —

        I’ve seen pieces like these pop up on occasion, and they are a type of post-Mint alteration. As I understand, these pieces are altered with a type of metal machining device. Why some people do this to their coins, however, is beyond me! Such a post-Mint alteration is worth at best face value, though if you find a collector who enjoys collecting such pieces (and there are people out there who do) they might be willing to pay a bit more.

        I hope this info is helpful,
        Josh

        1. Brenda Garner Avatar
          Brenda Garner

          I have a dime trying to see if it’s worth anything

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Brenda —

            What kind of dime are you trying to find out more about? Can you kindly upload a photo or two of this dime and/or describe the coin in greater detail, please?

            Thank you,
            Josh

        2. Cyndi Reis Loun Avatar
          Cyndi Reis Loun

          Yes it was, ty very much. And i want to apologize now, cause i will be asking a lot of questions, sorry.

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Ah, no worries, Cyndi! That’s what I’m here for and am glad to help with further questions now or in the future!

            Cheers,
            Josh

  101. Eli Avatar
    Eli

    I have a couple of Lincoln pennies that on one side have a wide or large rim, and on the other have no rim or a thin one, here are some pictures.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Eli —

      These sound like off-center strikes. I’d be curious by how much they’re off-center, as those with significantly off strikes are worth a little extra money. Do you have photos of your off-center coins you could kindly upload here, please?

      Thank you,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Eli –

          It’s off-center by a bit, but not enough to really increase its value any. As a circulated coin, it’s worth its copper value, or about 2 cents. Still, what a neat find!

          Best wishes,
          Josh

      1. Eli Avatar
        Eli

        This photo is one of the clearer coins, I don’t think that it is very off center. Thanks!

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Eli —

          These are off-center errors, technically, but they are not off-center “enough” to be worth more than their face or metal values. The 1972 and 1980 pennies are worth 2 cents, while the 1994 penny is worth 1 cent.

          Best wishes,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Lonnia —

      I do see the differences, and they appear to be due mainly to different circulation wear states, though there is some evidence the coin on the left has a stronger strike. This, however, is a normal difference and in this case does not really add any value to the coin in this grade.

      Both are worth face value, but they are great finds for helping build acuity in grading and strike variations!

      Good luck,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Lonnia —

      I do see the rim doubling, which is part of a fairly common strike error that creates finning. Generally, some more dramatic examples will draw some people to pay a little more than ordinary, but I’m not sure this piece would get much more over face value as it’s circulated. I’d suggest hanging on to the coin for now.

      Cool find,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Lori —

      It appears the rim of your 2014-D cent was flattened, possibly be centrifugal force in a commercial dryer. These are generally called “dryer coins,” an they are considered damaged by coin collecting standards but are still pretty neat looking if you ask me.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  102. Danni Wells Avatar
    Danni Wells

    Hello there, Ive been collecting pennies my whole life and I recently found this among my collection. It does not stick to a magnet and It weighs correctly can I get your opinion on it https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0eabecf5d4dd1156fec99b81f01919fae08fbe158d458f3febbd931359e3f4a5.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fbed029f8a9fe5e8f17a7a184113537ca7edd5bed0cfb22f4f65f0827ba17d02.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Danni —

      If this is what it appears to be, it would take much more than a photo identification for this coin to be deemed authentic. It would take at the very least several in-hand inspections by third-party coin grading experts, or those with that training, plus weigh-ins, metal test, etc. As for what I see here in the photo, I’m a little concerned about the appearance of the lettering and date, but the photo is also a tad grainy. Do you have any clearer images you could kindly upload? I’d be happy to help further on my end, but I don’t want to miss anything that I’m looking at. After all, the coin, if authentic, would be worth about $85,000 to $100,000 or more!

      Hope to kindly hear more from you about this piece,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Danni —

          Here’s an article on the 1943-D Lincoln cent by the Professional Coin Grading Service… https://www.pcgs.com/News/Pcgs-certified-1943-d-Bronze-Cent-Sold-For-17-Million

          In the meantime, lets do two things with yours:

          *Take its weight — how much does your 1943-D cent weigh, down to the hundredth of the gram?
          *See if your penny is magnetic doubtful

          Please tell me what your findings are and we will proceed from there…

          Hope to hear from you soon,
          Josh

          1. Danni Wells Avatar
            Danni Wells

            It did not stick to any magnets and I don’t know how accurate this scale is but it weighed 2.81 when I first found it we weighed it on a different scale and it weighed 3.12

  103. Macy Lacy Avatar
    Macy Lacy

    While digging in my flower bed I found a penny. It is so dirty/pitted on the front I cannot see a date. HOWEVER, the back is completely in reverse!!! Any ideas?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Macy Lacy,

      May I see a photo of the coin? I’d be happy to assist further.

      Thank you,
      Josh

  104. Cyndi Christie Avatar
    Cyndi Christie

    I bought some rolls of nickels and found a 1943 nickel with the S mint mark on reverse side. Upon looking at the coin i could see there was a die crack on the reverse side. I goes from the ridge through the I and B in ythe word PLURIBUS spliting each letter towards the bottom of the word and travels to the top left side of the monticello building. The are also a few tiny die cracks. Would like to know if it has any value.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Cyndi Christie —

      I’ll need to please see a photo of the coin to know for sure, but I’d be glad to take a look at the 1943-S Jefferson and help further. By the way, congrats on finding a war nickel in rolls! It’s much tougher to find these silver coins, even in rolls, than many think.

      Cheers,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, June —

      The 1970-S large date is worth its copper value, or about 2 cents. The 1983-D on the left, assuming it’s made from its regular zinc-based composition (and is not an off-metal copper error), is worth face value.

      Have a great day,
      Josh

  105. Robert Kapellas Avatar
    Robert Kapellas

    Hi, I’m wondering if these two coins that I have are errors I have a 1973 nickel from the Philadelphia mint and it has a real weird finish to it like almost waves on it it looks really cool I’ll attach a picture https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ffe2e7473d59acbbaa90ad4f0f694aac5634a6be612d4e13f60e1f300177d32d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/618396b0511a4e4b79b62ca0f71135a29f346998886f4a3e0a82b967a4531e4c.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9f5fced54ddef6267dc89a8e5348ae5e3a7760c58c62c05952d64e73ab819690.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ef3f89895eb70fca3417b2d0e5eb7094d3616715b9b3ffc05b5b88f6780249f.jpg also I have a 1991 Philadelphia mint quarter that I believe is a no clad error on both sides I’m not sure though if you could help me out I’d appreciate it my my ph phone number is 216-218-6029 if you can give me a text or call I appreciate it here’s a p https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e9a7460909b7555cd5d05ea6c3c8b16de8d1626d307e7f253fac38b7398ef1e1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fe3097ca059f43fa0d9c53d9928e5cc63cb10f82ec2e438153b92051ae9690ab.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/312aa9c6592a6edf20cad1688de5450b288a9759d16ded7d13f6d39e36819eec.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/02ecc792ad671f119926198beb595f1258cc3a54938aea1a1f3062a7b3c36f58.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/aa2c30e86f905a9fdad33fe5455fdc76db9be1cbaa376cbaa07e7e538a01073a.jpg icture of the quarter https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/275c472ddd9c6f58bf70124779e1fc6f1fd453d4a2f083b8127f223a7cfafc85.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      In both cases the odd-looking appearance is caused by toning. The quarter exhibits environmental damage, whereas it looks like the nickel toned in a cloth bag. While the quarter is worth face value, the 1973 nickel appears to be uncirculated and is worth at least 15 to 20 cents, maybe more if the surface looks nearly flawless under magnification.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  106. Robert Kapellas Avatar
    Robert Kapellas

    Also do you know anything about stamps? Because I have a really cool printing plate from the USPS https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9505207fa5114c72f1ae9ec098aef3450375012941d6b300d4c77f0acd5ff101.jpg I’ve been told it’s worth a lot of money but I’m not really sure to be exact what it’s worth if you can help me find a value for it Id appreciate it, I’ll give you a commission If u help me sell it

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      I’m afraid I have no knowledge of stamps beyond using them for postage. I apologize. Perhaps you might try reaching out to the folks on Stamp Community Forum: https://www.stampcommunity.org/

      Best of luck!
      Josh

  107. Eduardo De La Torre Avatar
    Eduardo De La Torre

    Hi, I have a 1973 D penny that weights 3.18 grams. How rare and valuable is it?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Edurado —

      This is actually within the + 0.13-gram tolerance for Lincoln cents, meaning that a “standard” issue bronze cent may weigh as little 2.98 grams or as much as 3.24 grams, with the authorized weight pegged at 3.11 grams (the weight published along with other specs for the Lincoln cent. At any rate, you seem to describe an otherwise-normal 1973-D cent, which is worth about 2 cents for its copper value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Ariella —

      These are both 1982-D large dates — not the rare small date. I can tell they are large dates because the “9” and “8” exceed the height of the “1” and “2” in the date.

      Keep on looking!
      -Josh

      1. Ariella Avatar
        Ariella

        OK THANKS.SO THE 1982 D IS ALSO IN COPPER 3.1 grams

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Yes, Ariella. Unfortunately in this case you seem to have the 1982-D large date copper coins, whereas it’s the 1982-D copper small date that is the rare coin.

          Keep looking — and good luck!
          -Josh

  108. Lissa C Della Avatar
    Lissa C Della

    Hi Josh, I recently received my first 2018 D penny in my pocket change. For some reason, this one stuck out. When I looked at it closely, I swear that I can see what looks to be shadows of other letters after the “e” of “We” and in between the word “Trust”. The only clear letter I could make out is “U” (see picture). I tried to capture the others but was unsuccessful. They are not raised, more flat, and hard to see in certain light. I didn’t see any shadow letters on the reverse… But there looks to be a ring that runs through the letters on both obverse and reverse. Any thoughts on what this could be?

    Aloha,
    Lissa https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b07f8d3afac8363b1ee1c252aca6d76626f89d6dc8299739d588c3faa7f4508c.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b3305590130584e086603dcfe60cc9270dadb38e7bea4e9c001517668c3c4834.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/62703f23038055869b06a27e0d9fb7cab569dbbf7d8551502dbcf17d38f52ab0.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hey, Lissa —

      I see the mark you’re pointing to. It doesn’t look like a die error, but what your coin DOES seem to have is a light die clash, as indicated by what looks like faint raised rim inside the main rim of the obverse. Such pieces are sometimes worth about a dollar or so.

      Neat coin,
      Josh

  109. Lissa C Della Avatar
    Lissa C Della

    Aloha Josh,

    I found another interesting coin: 2008 Washington Qtr., State of Hawaii. I am still trying to learn how to recognize MD from an actual DD… I see doubling in the word “STATES”, and in the letter “F” of “OF” (not pictured close up). After reading the above article, I am leaning towards MD… But still a bit unsure. I would love to hear your thoughts.

    Mahalo,
    Lissa

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9cf8a901d13ab86a84b0eee62dce7ab5f269d40970ca08298b074cc67bbb33de.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3f682791d3b6931929a033dff378f41c0874667ac14230fa01447703f80faebb.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/99da3542036b3654cbe22ecde1f8ae645b33d1f764fc677ad423d3d5c07b9a8c.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bbb33a61dcecb9b1eb98e2af043cd0e25a9a8f754bb41427db881920ad00847b.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Lissa —

      Off the bat, here’s a neat guide with photos to help explain doubled dies versus machine doubling: https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/5688/Double-Dies-vs-Machine-Doubling/

      On your coin, it appears to be machine doubling as the serifs in the letters are not fully split. It might be worth a look by variety expert John Wexler to make sure, as one serif in the “T” (the second one on the right) looks like it may be split. Here’s Wexler’s website: doubleddie.com

      Fingers crossed,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hey, Tammy —

      Yup! Looks like you found a filled-die error of some type here. Nice find. Such pieces sometimes trade for a little more than the coin’s usual value as some collectors like these oddities. There’s no “book value” on these though, so it’s anyone’s guess what it would go for. Maybe a dollar or two?

      Cool find,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hey, Robin —

      This is pretty interesting… Someone wore down the rim and edges of a 2011-D nickel! Looks like a sander job to me. Worth a nickel, but the story it could tell is certainly worth more.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Theo —

      This coin appears authentic but it has some severe post-mint edge damage from what appears to be a jewelry mount. It is safe to spend it at face value if you wish.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Theo Rolle Avatar
        Theo Rolle

        Thanks alot for your reply it is appreciated.

        Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

        ——– Original message ——–

  110. Tom Henkes Avatar
    Tom Henkes

    I have some 2018 Rev proof quarters that the reeded edge seems to be coming thru on the Washington side, like it https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/437a882738999550dbe4ab6534489bff6567c3203a66105b423667a5cfb51ffb.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1450562cf0cc42a9cd21de01132be3b66342e3bac56ff11b75b9c252a979ce03.jpg was off center a little. Is this normal? It’s not all that noticeable with the naked eye.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tom —

      Hmmm… This one is teasing with me. I’m not sure if this piece is a indicative of a mint error or something else. I’d suggest checking this out with a variety specialist who has seen more of the 2018 proof quarters and is more familiar with any emerging die/planchet issues. My best reference for this would be the folks at CONECA. Here’s their info: https://varietyvista.com/

      Fingers crossed,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Good day, Tom —

      I think I do see a shift in the design… I can’t verify if what I’m seeing at this resolution is true evidence of die doubling or machine/strike doubling but I do see it. While I can’t find listings for any 1916-S Mercury doubled die, there are reports for many other issues in the series, and maybe this one simply hasn’t been discovered yet otherwise. I suggest you send these images to variety expert John Wexler and see if he can attribute this piece. His info can be found at doubleddie.com

      Good luck!
      -Josh

      1. Tom Henkes Avatar
        Tom Henkes

        Thanks for your thoughts Josh, I’ll forward the pictures to John.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Good luck, Tom!
          -Josh

  111. Laurie Locklear Avatar
    Laurie Locklear
    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Laurie —

      This looks like an alteration to me… There is no known variety like this and a die break wouldn’t look like this either. If you wish to get a second opinion from die variety expert John Wexler (doubleddie.com) by all means go for it, but I say this coin has been altered.

      Fingers crossed!
      Josh

  112. Jon Peterson Avatar
    Jon Peterson

    Hello, I have this 2002 Roosevelt dime that has a distinct number 5 and 3 stamped into the surface. It appears as if the coin immage was pressed over the numbers as you can see eyelashes on the 5, the neckline is evident in the 3, and the date can be seen on the 3 and is distorted around it. Any ideas? Has anyone seen anything like this?https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/516944ab316d58143c33887fff0e9d0ead759158a1ed90c1309da2a2ecaecba9.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jon —

      This coin was counterstamped after it left the US Mint, though for what purpose is anyone’s guess. Commonly coins are counterstamped like this by stores and other companies as giveaways for merchandise promotions. Hang on to this coin, as some collectors pay small premiums for counterstamped coins, though how much is a case-by-case thing and a matter of how much one is willing to pay. I’ve seen similar pieces trade for $1 to $2.

      Cool find,
      Josh

  113. Jason Herman Avatar
    Jason Herman

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5c2e0ca56f6ac6647967ff0f2dbadc6c0a77cc5730d667860eb3f3960ebc1bb1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/60c3cce119e069e9ac1398418275ba678535df84fd94994c036c620eba32b939.jpg
    Hello Josh,
    I am trying to figure out if this is a dryer coin, or an error coin. It is only rolled on the on side. Please let me know if you would take it to a coin dealer to investigate.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jason —

      The image is a tad blurry so I can’t tell for sure. Something suggests this may also be a mount collar to attach the coin to a piece of jewelry, but what I can’t tell is how wide this piece is; if it’s narrower than the regular 19.1 millimeters, then it’s likely the coin has a rolled edge. If it’s wider, it’s most likely a mount.

      Interesting piece to say the least!
      Josh

      1. Austin Herman Avatar
        Austin Herman

        Hello Joshua,
        I am Jason’s son. Here are higher quality images. We are still not sure about this coin because every rolled coin that we have ever seen was thick on the obverse and reverse https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f187657c85207c9451d18c54c0cc7b0dad0b8991892802b581cd6df9284107ce.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3c9aa22aa7c040f1265bc49ae7b063417e00ab014356f1fe6def4d3016275996.jpg

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Austin!

          These are very helpful images — thank you for posting them. These photos confirm for me that this coin is encased in a jewelry mount. Note on the reverse (“tail’s side”) how some of the metal flange is pulled back from the edge of the coin, right around the 6 o’clock position? A piece like this is considered altered by diehard coin collectors, but I’d keep this as is. It’s an unusual find and if you want to sell it you may find a novelty coin collector who will pay a buck or two for it.

          Cool find! Thank you for reaching out!
          -Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Terry —

      It looks like the edge was manipulated or altered in a manner known as spooning… This piece, while an eye catcher, is worth face value.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  114. Andrew Avatar
    Andrew

    hello everyone how are i got a question. i got back change at a store and this 1 quarter just stands out like sore thumb so i looked up by year. it is a 1983 P Quarter once i found out there is errors of this coin i did what it said check with magnifier and to me vs another quarter this things got some issues going on lol i almost threw away at first wheni saw it like thats a fake ass quarter..so i wanna know if anyone could look at this quarter who knows more about this then me n see if they seeing same iasues i am there like 4 or 5 issues i am seeing that id personally call error vs another quarter you have to good i took pics of all ones i found n outline them if someone could help me out plz email Andrew1963imp@gmail.com and ill send u all pics i found issue of and then a clear photo of coin front n back for you to check see what u come up with thank you and sorry this msg was so long lol

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Andrew —

      Would you please post some clear photos of your 1983 quarter so I can further assist?

      Thank you!
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Erica —

          It’s possible this is a die trial error coin but to advise further on this, I’d need to please some clear photos of the entire coin, both front and back. If you wouldn’t mind uploading some more images of this coin I’d be glad to help further.

          Interesting find!
          Josh

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            Best as I can tell this 1979 cent is really worn down but does not appear to be a die trial strike; I can tell because the Lincoln statue inside the Lincoln Memorial appears to strong to have been struck weakly. However, if the coin is really worn down, his image will be protected within the columns if the coin was well worn. This piece is still worth about 2 cents for its copper metal content.

            Thank you for your reaching out,
            Josh

          2. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hey there Josh,
            I came across a few liberty V nickels I am wondering if these dates are 1906 or 1908.
            If by chance these infact are 1906 is this valuable being that the 6 is connected ? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/30438bfc20e9360ec95351b2d420d57d88e70dcd144b62ba4b28eb64b841dfc5.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/30438bfc20e9360ec95351b2d420d57d88e70dcd144b62ba4b28eb64b841dfc5.png

          3. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica!

            Great find! It looks like a 1906 Liberty nickel. The connection of the serif in the “6” to its bottom loop would have occurred through heavy wear and I also see signs of a light post-mint hit (the gouge) at the top of the 6. Still, this is a really nice, well-circulated example Liberty nickel. I can’t see the rest of the coin to give it an approximate grade assessment, but it’s probably worth a couple dollars.

            Nice find,
            Josh

          4. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            Nice vintage piece…. This is about what I imagine it looks like. I’d say it’s worth maybe a dollar or so.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

          5. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            The 1982-D cent has a large date, so it’s a common piece. The weakness in the “LI” of “LIBERTY” appears to be a strikethrough error, with perhaps some grease getting in the die. These types of errors are often worth a small premium and therefore this piece is worth holding aside. With the “FG” initials on the reverse, it looks like there might be a die break in there. These are common errors, but highly collectible. This one, too, is worth holding aside, with some variety collectors paying a small premium for such pieces. Because the variety/error market is more niche, there really aren’t “book” values for such pieces. It depends on the how much the individual collector is willing to pay (which really is the case with all coins)

            Thank you for reaching out!
            Josh

          6. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            The top photo appears to have a die crack going through his nose and the bottom cent appears to have a filled “4,” likely caused by grease in the die. The die crack is probably worth about $2 to $5 depending on the collector, whereas the filled “4” error probably could fetch about a dollar or so from the right collector.

            You’re making some excellent finds!
            Josh

          7. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hello Josh,
            I have a few more for you, hope I am not bothering you with all these questions! I am just really interested in error coins. Now for these one’s 1983 d there appears to be a “s” on the E in cent, the second one is a 1980d quater filled in letters. Anything worth keeping?
            quhttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6c21b7d3c6ffd1a418c44a24df25ebda5d884b9a689414ef08ae27b1b3df7197.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/95e5d404dffa21a626fd83035fe4cea688c0ec1bea0ef1cd404ede07c6dd387e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7a87af9177fe3383b1e7a7364ad4f62a4184887e5826a39fa704aeb14827d259.jpg

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b7d018d43e75ff2515fa2b6083697327f81525bfd0e37d8ec937378124869e15.png

          8. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            I’d need to please see a photo of the entire 1980-D quarter to determine if the filled-in letters are caused by wear or die chips (error). As for that hook coming off the “E” in “CENT” on the penny? Now THAT looks like a minor die break and would be an error! Nice find… Such minor errors like that are generally worth $1 to $2 to the right collector.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

          9. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica –

            OK, I think the Washington quarter may have some die issues with the area of IN GO WE TRUST. I think for sure some die chips, giving some of the letters that “filled in” appearance. Hold this one aside, because if it checked out in-hand, I’m sure there are some error collectors who would be willing to pay a few bucks for a piece like that. The 2017 cent appears scorched, perhaps either it was in a fire or someone intentionally mutilated it with a blow torch.

            Those are my two cents,
            Josh

          10. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            I don’t see the “D” over the “A” so I’m not sure what that is. There is some type of planchet flaw on the 1967 Lincoln cent, and that might be worth a buck or two to a collector interested in such varieties. The 1954-S Lincoln cent appears to have a die chip, and that, too, is a minor error that can be worth a buck or two to the right collector. Your 1987 Lincoln cent has a die clash — again, a common error with nominal value of about $1 or so.

            Cool finds!
            Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hello, Erica —

          In this case what you have here is indeed a really chewed-up Lincoln cent… Looks like this one has led a less-than glorious life in its nearly 40 years! It is, however, worth about 2 cents for its copper metal value.

          Thank you for reaching out!
          Josh

  115. jenz420 Avatar
    jenz420

    Hey josh,
    Was wondering if you could help me out.
    My husband got a silver peace dollar from our lcs that was slabbed and barcoded as if it were professionally graded. However, to me it doesn’t seem to be a very high end grading company, if it was catalogued by an actual grading company at all.
    That being said, would you mind taking a look, and tell me if this is an actual grading company slab, or if it is just for show. I know the coin is real, but not buying the slab or grade it just looks unprofessional.

      1. jenz420 Avatar
        jenz420

        Also, sorry I posted this under errors, it was just a quick question, but boy have I got some errors for you!!! The coin gods have finally shined upon me I believe, I hope you can confirm, but I probably won’t be posting all of that until tomorrow… and the funniest story of how this all happened… talk to you soon, and as always, many thanks for being so helpful and courteous.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Jenz!

          Oooh, please post a few clear images of these gems! I’m looking forward to seeing them and hopefully being able to help! I’m always glad to be of assistance as best I can.

          Thank you,
          Josh

          1. jenz420 Avatar
            jenz420

            Ok, you asked for it, but first, you know you have to listen to my ramblings about how I came across these errors.
            I have been searching for coin errors for about 6 or 8 months now. And I have grown quite fond of looking at coins. I find it relaxing yet exciting all at the same time. I’m sure you share the feeling of excitement you get when you finally find that error that you read about. However, after consulting you, and others about my excitement, and finding that I was over reacting 100% of the time lol. ( Not a low blow to you or any of the others that have been informing me of my short comings, as I totally appreciate the help and advice that you give).
            Anywho. On Monday, after sorting what seemed to be a mountain of metal, I turned to my husband and said, “That’s it!!! I am no longer looking for errors on coins!! My eyes hurt, I can’t see straight, and I’m never right. So, from now on, I am just going to keep the coins that I find attractive.” And I began putting every dime that was shiny in my keep pile until it was time to stop for the night and go to bed.
            Now on Tuesday (yesterday), I got the hubby and the kids off to school and work, and I sat down at my table in front of the pile of dimes that I hadn’t yet made it through. With a heavy heart I started moving the booger’s around and I noticed that one of the dimes looked that grayish color that silver becomes with age. I look closer, and notice that it is, from the 80’s, but the last number is funny to the point that I still question whether it is a 3 or a 5. (This is where you come in. My go-to guy) as I am photographing the little guy, I almost fell out of my chair. I have no idea but I know you will help me or point me in the right direction. So here is one of the several errors that have been jumping in my lap since I declared that I would no longer be searching pocket change for errors… lol but I’ll throw in a bonus as well, because finding that particular quarter almost caused me to pee my pants! Hahaha… so without further ado…. a 1980-something Roosevelt dime, and a big surprise! Lol ok well the big surprise will have to wait til the hubby gets home. But the one picture is your hint as to what it is 🙂
            Don’t forget to help me identify what’s up with the dime!
            Thanks again Josh and remember, I am no longer searching for error coins… lol
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6ced3f6710d227241d9fed01b32dbf5674c292396ab7e54169c7aa293ea2e332.jpg
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/775b2eedde913a9da89b1c9e58139341b6e125d950dc4f4a7f3255c875a8b3ce.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/83e605a505d4a375711e402fa908c263cef7325e81992bb8d172c75532c98383.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/90b318c0b83024cec2b512c77932645abe09445f41e9316b63a1e66e2ec385de.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f1511b64450b9d1600a6e10fe1e297a6d2f82cf70749a238ab7c0f715fc460ec.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6bcae2684aebb424c574fa1fc6e88aca4ec2c5e5ed7d4bad805a25949bc83fc4.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/072aa17b31eb7689b04fcd5ed0871935c2e92c93be22493062ad57ade194587b.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f314a882e92ff922fd30bcee32cfefe306d93c5bbca6152239220fc08ec1c563.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ad6e65d8f8d0a621cdcf5c3bd1687361db3f463ca5b02e081cd114d2a18baaed.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ede9aa44ddbb92f1943d255ac81a3ba15be1e55f88b9b0a32a7f4761b269d751.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4ab2ea80eaf101a2b03eaa63825b17894a293c1b807fc8b87f2177aea5727638.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e8e2d9d20eed6a16f87143187c1a3144304c975a831c9cbde35a4d5da42a7328.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/76bfa33812d44833044328c0c10b7430dfbd4fab8dc31cc41790bbc68bfd2125.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a91de390165ed0a311f2b6a60abbd387fef247cc55c6cfe091ea22f6d6c21e20.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6ced3f6710d227241d9fed01b32dbf5674c292396ab7e54169c7aa293ea2e332.jpg

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hey, Jenz!!!

            Well,I hope you never give up on looking for errors. Hard to find? Yes! But just waiting to be discovered? YES! Now, all of the issues with the date numerals are totally post-mint damage. However (drum roll, please!), what is THAT on the reverse, by the word DIME? Are those raised lines? From what I see in the image, that looks like some kind of massive die break heading north-northwest from the rim by the base of the “E” in “DIME.” If those are raised lines, I’d certainly get this attributed. That looks significant to me. See what variety expert John Wexler (doubleddie.com) thinks!

            WOW!! Fingers crossed,
            Josh

          3. jenz420 Avatar
            jenz420

            Joshua!!!! Please check out this quarter and let me know what you think. It looks to me as if there is doubling all over the place on this quarter. And there are some extremely peculiar indentations on the eagle making it look as though it’s been shot lol. The wings look wired, it just doesn’t look like the average quarter. And the indents are definitely not gouges. I tried to get as many close ups as I could. Fingers crossed 1990 D Washington quarter. Talk to you soon!
            Jen https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0cb1950073c0cb278dcc65ae813fca700758b2264185e1936abf6c11371658e2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/034bc85db78a35c32315afa502e3d248b62f688145138b962807a12f27434dc9.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48171e875da57628b34a38ee99afd377ea0fa47c6ed2b419295f42642aee8012.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/35f360355647a745e8620fe0faaed87afd101c17c734799aa2a5f4eee43eb723.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d6139598f534fdff67271f94e75b461eb7b9dec6c84e77e03a6c59169a7c61bc.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2f38e03c6cd9817a864bae574924b3a44371dbc94618f932daf51321b2ca8e72.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5b5a60ab230a67b1ac997f938e122214b2669ef9afa9388adef30a2afac61573.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/79b46a9c25c7d88b14835fd6472fc27c37eb1c6916d1341227c4d83f71729b2a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/167fdfacbd0b6d6d26ab7a49ce07fc75fd1800e7f90adda17e10c6455cc6c266.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/285e58906ed0a4cc6a5c3504cd5cd6c479a0bdf13c4a2845b7aba27b433be0d9.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e7d8728d1627c88eb79315626399a3acf731ad38f596826c3fbfe18f0525b786.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0d5bd7371bfe4c2ac6e9fc65d88a43e46ef63cfbaabcc47916b18cb0603a76f0.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1a3322614d5937972c4a1adbbab6df412d5cf7acf2eb5e1fb437508d70b7506e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/68bc9177c47270d07203281b73f29345bb97d75e51e20b5680b6161ec346445f.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/68bc9177c47270d07203281b73f29345bb97d75e51e20b5680b6161ec346445f.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d3f09a00e5944c965f6b16337850848312606b7e825fdf2fd404d2f490257679.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/07cd282118ee714adf78fd173607a9e4e2a1720997c9f0724d43195625d20ae9.jpg

          4. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Jenz —

            From what I see here this appears to be machine doubling, which is not valuable but still pretty neat. The indentations are post-mint damage… One important rule to go by in determining a mint error versus damage is that if the strange marks are going INTO the surface, like nicks or scratches, it’s in the vast majority of cases post-mint damage. The exceptions are generally planchet flaws, which isn’t the case here.

            Keep searching! 😀
            -Josh

          5. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hiya, Jenz!

            Would you please describe to me what I’m looking for here? Is it spread/doubling? The closeups are a tad fuzzy on my end for some reason… Would you mind also sending a couple clear photos of the entire coin, too? I’d be happy to help further!

            Thank you for reaching out,
            Josh

          6. jenz420 Avatar
            jenz420

            Lol josh, I’m so sorry. The pictures look blurry, because they are blurry! I didn’t realize how bad they actually are. I guess after searching all night they looked fantastic to my worn out eyes when I posted them.
            Here goes tho. The first extreme close up is of Lincoln’s ear. Which to me, not only looks longer than normal, but also extra wide. The second extreme close up is the vbd which also looks doubled as though it were re-punched, for lack of the technical term. And the last one is the bow tie, also looking doubled around the outside edges. I noticed the spread on lettering too, looking like it is doubled, maybe counter clockwise? I’m not exactly sure of all of the lingo, I just know that things look larger on the front of the coin but perfect on the back. Also, I know it’s hard to tell in the picture, but I noticed a hint of a small vertical line going through the eye close to the nose somewhat doubling the eye.

          7. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hey, Jenz!

            No worries — I’m just glad it’s not just my computer or, worse yet, my eyes seeing blurriness ha ha! The VDB itself isn’t repunched, because it’s part of the entire die design that is transferred from the master hub or master die. It’s a little difficult for me to tell in the photos previously uploaded because, again, they are a tad blurry. However, if you do see clear doubling of the eye it is always worth running it by an official die expert, a numismatist like John Wexler or Chuck Daughtrey, who has attribution rights.

            Best wishes!
            Josh

          8. jenz420 Avatar
            jenz420

            Josh, let’s forget about the 2017 p Penny for a moment because I think I have found something HUGEEEE!!! Please take a look at big bird on the back of this 93 D quarter. Particularly the foot and leg on the left! Well, actually the whole darn thing. The arrows, the wings, his Mohawk, I also believe it has extra thickness on the letters. The front of the coin looks ok. Maybe a little doubling on the I get. But Washington looks beat up so I assume the answers for the obverse would be die set. Or mm.
            Let me know what you think. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6618d8ec59f8609cc865f33896a701c7cbd4397ce3fcbc6a96030d76d0414db6.jpg
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1b773df43fb0e8e28faf265f75bee13c745fdea175296df1e65f3529d99c3efe.jpg
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6618d8ec59f8609cc865f33896a701c7cbd4397ce3fcbc6a96030d76d0414db6.jpg seehttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c2a665cf74730d757a81f6b276d2b7d7dcfac9f32d7157b71c418bc3848b29e2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/62a57c6d8bd971951e0f35a709cc3b8c937cd647e477fc6ae46d13d30120edc5.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5dc2a2b4bf5558eb39771535741698fd330c12a0f04b30ef21b8e20a5aa0a0c2.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/722ce0eaf8d26807ce5681d9f1b4f19bae21fa63fd69bea722138e15ceab6649.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f04d85ea7ff13b756f58e54dc34ff271c6ed6877a621301531ae298f922fdbbf.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/79884eef719e3a5c97e653d6bad4a6f603d33b717a8186fb718f25bd7cc0baee.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/79884eef719e3a5c97e653d6bad4a6f603d33b717a8186fb718f25bd7cc0baee.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/280a66889eb3e76cc739c2acff8e337e653640b071970818b64a8486aa05e2b6.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4e096e4cb8a9217c60e60b3bf7156b794ee9b5caf01a49b611550e79b96f0a08.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ffaabee9380ff075f68c0160cbffab3360cff579a1faee2da40e6118f487563e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e3c7589978c7eccf91c4dc00b488eb4d499398634e0d7dae3798a9f3f5f2a44e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fdde914c0bd72206ce20e1f79b96ac75a50e93a1f8b6790b438b7ab7d8d5e82b.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/df3e294422bf319dbe8a658cb10f42359114289f370754acba4de7ff579b9bc7.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4031b17486e983b9c53efcedd7da0a81dd37910c65a1e039f9d92caa650c7621.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bbe5ea422bb0023e6bed39dac7ffb6a7c3445f5009a89f26d0a3e194b8bc0b8f.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7b8bea55ae90a976a95171d2fb1ff41e4d21036a473faeaf3519f4cbe04a277b.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7f9dcf8ff81cbe7c94caccaf01bb1ad2b79b0fbf72b6e9536c54f42afd0c2767.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/286eb1e6a1bc2feca858fce0e723af76bf3e52cfe5f83771df0938f721c64dde.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dd374a1cbfd18dc22134c714ed15aca4ef7f86b32bc37f028becc665a886180f.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/eb3a3f077846547b8f79682619e169cee1b341442f1465e46b7a7074f65fc897.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4444cdb55cfd8ace64c2d6176058d2447d95948f3d5400f9cc3934edd7f39fa1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e0366ba68c2f6e913f1d2fb5981abcf613f530e88f4e2a8037a53c4ff1d1d35e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/62a57c6d8bd971951e0f35a709cc3b8c937cd647e477fc6ae46d13d30120edc5.jpg

          9. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Jenz —

            I’m running through all known records of doubled dies and there is none for any 1993 that I can find. I do see the doubling in parts of the heraldic eagle, but there’s just a LOT of it, and it all seems flat, like mechanical doubling. Also, I’m not so sure I see doubling in the letters. Often (but not always) when inscriptions are doubled you will see a small ridge dividing the “primary” letter from the doubled, as well as divisions in the serifs, when the font has serifs. Send this one by to John Wexler or CONECA if you’d like for a second opinion or hopeful attribution but I think this is a case of machine/mechanical doubling. At least those are two cents — er, 25 cents?

            Best wishes,
            Josh

          10. jenz420 Avatar
            jenz420

            Ok so I retract my earlier statement about the obverse of the quarter in question. I can’t tell exactly what’s going on here, but know there’s something.
            Take a look at Washington’s ribbon. In his hair. There are 3 loops instead of the usual 2. I just see lots of things going on in this coin. Am I crazy or do you see them too?

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f84cec917d3ff0b030a198fc4f0d8338a6c848747a7f657dce11abcfcdc76e1b.jpg

          11. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Jenz —

            Actually the three bands are normal on quarters from the 1990s on up; those details were soft and mushy on earlier quarters but sharpened in the early 90s. Note, the early 90s quarters are also the first ones in which Washington’s hair strands are especially sharp. Some derisively refer to his hair on the quarters since the 1990s as “spaghetti hair.” The doubling in the date is unfortunately mechanical doubling/strike shift and is not a valuable error.

            Do keep looking! 🙂
            -Josh

          12. jenz420 Avatar
            jenz420

            One more shot in this round of pocket change searching, I’m telling you, I have spent all winter searching through this mountain of change, and I seem to have gotten nowhere… lol
            Now onto this quarter I found today.
            How can you tell if a quarter is missing it’s clad layers?
            I have found this 1994 P (?) quarter. It is copper in color, and looks very poorly sticker. It is also missing the edge reeding. What the heck is going on here. I put it under the microscope, and the quarter doesn’t show any signs of ever even having the reeding at all to begin with. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7cd01ef812b7ae653017add7a4a7a8aea0fc3bc4f00ee9d7ffe7fe904f909413.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/04608887c5d01b6d9c841d57eaa50c98eb3e9e708ee0951a690e93eadf356a03.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/409c5e1a92084d429b4af0e7f1eb794f4c08218317a888c7631bd73a14bc5959.jpg

          13. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Jenz —

            This poor guy looks like he was either dipped in acid or exposed to some very intense environmental conditions — perhaps high heat, such as a fire. The dark coloration is definitely environmental damage, and the putting and missing edge reeding is either chemical exposure or intense heat. It’s worth face value, but it’s an eye catcher with a story to say the least.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jenz —

      I need to please see the entire slab plus the entire label to know what company this is. From what I can tell, this is what we might call a C-tier grading company, or a “basement” grader. Unfortunately plastic slabs are now available for all to buy on eBay and other marketplaces, and this means everybody and their brother can essentially begin “certifying” coins. If I can find the name of this company, I can tell you if they’re registered as a legitimate business, but even that doesn’t guarantee the company is reputable. At the end of the day, it’s best just to stick to buying coins in slabs from the major companies; PCGS, NGC, ANACS, and ICG. Here’s more info on slabbed coins: https://uscoinsguide.com/slabbed_coins/

      I hope this info is helpful!
      -Josh

  116. Shannon Jorgensen Avatar
    Shannon Jorgensen

    Helllo !
    I am so happy I found you again ! I wasnt sure that was possible but you struck me as an honest person with some real knowledge and seem willing to help people so I looked and here you are and now I have joined and now I am hoping you can tell me if this quarter appears to be an error or someone just mucked with it ….a lot ! It is bizarre to me how the edges look melted , could you please share your opinion about this with me ? Thank you for your time and thank you for being here !! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2dd05909891140ad5b624736d9c6f6bdb759ea3e095651db657b3a7932dc28e0.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/166a15050d1676e7ceea766dc42a1f270b2e42c93b1d582b3b1d1d9e2c682f32.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Shannon —

      Oh my gosh, I’ve never seen a state quarter look as damaged (and sad) as this one. It looks to me like someone took a hammer to this coin, but only it knows what it suffered. If only coins could talk… I think this one would shout. It’s worth only face value (if anyone will accept it as money) but it’s story is probably worth a whole lot more than 25 cents!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  117. Shannon Jorgensen Avatar
    Shannon Jorgensen

    hello ?
    why was my comment marked as spam ? i am a legitimate person with a legitimate inquiry .. i dont understand ?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Shannon —

      I don’t know why it would have been marked as spam. In fact, I’m looking through the admin spam filter now and don’t see any comments from you at all in the past weeks marked as spam. Are you referring to a recent comment?

      Hmm… I’m sorry for any inconvenience on your end…
      -Josh

      1. Shannon Jorgensen Avatar
        Shannon Jorgensen

        Joshua hello !
        There was a message on my end that said it was marked as spam …apparently I have misunderstood the situation and I apologize if I seemed rude . I truly was just confused . I thank you for taking the time to view my coin , I have other coins that actually might not just be victims of society … I hope you will not mind if I show them to you now and again ? At any rate , thank you and take care !

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          No worries, Shannon! I don’t know how the message got there or why that happened, but by all means please feel free to share some more coins you’re curious about! I’ll help as best I can!

          Cheers,
          Josh

  118. Avin Avatar
    Avin

    I found a Canadian 2009 penny with an obvious metal blotch under Elizabeth. I couldn’t find anything anywhere with the same error. do I have something very rare. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fc2f690c8162eb16f21093e555b2cd7f8f587b703d9d440086b8e498a8285a67.png

  119. Arthur Avatar
    Arthur

    Here is a Indian head cent I got recently, I know it should be a ddr, but what about a ddo??? die erosion perhaps???

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Arthur —

      I’m afraid I don’t see any accompanying photos of your Indian Head cent; would you please re-upload it?

      Thank you,
      Josh

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Arthur —

        As the doubling is shallow and appears on both sides of the coin it is most likely caused by die deterioration. However, if you want a second opinion I suggest sending these photos to variety specialist John Wexler at doubleddie.com

        Best wishes,
        Josh

  120. George Perez Avatar
    George Perez

    I have this 1977 Ike dollar that looks like it wasn’t pressed all the way or someone messed with it. I was wonder what light you could shed I also have a silver bicentennial ike and one bicentennial that isn’t all silver they’re all same size but I haven’t weighed them yet, but I detract from my initial request. Also the front of the Ike has a ring in it. Any ideas. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/02b303ba5e206495cb47e2d31a48b5608f35acb7cbe609f426b18abc9149a594.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2a1eaa32d73025275ad18492dde9166c603f40a879c9dad2b179c0b65c433e93.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/35974608f5df4666f281b316970aa44477b70da911bac6da1be852d63966d066.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, George —

      The ring on the obverse of your Ike dollar is post-mint damage, perhaps from being used in a vending machine or slot machine. Otherwise the coin just appears to be worn to me. I don’t see any signs that the coin was weakly struck because the protected parts of the design — those that would be unaffected by wear — appear normal to me. This piece is essentially worth face value.

      Thank you for reaching out!
      Josh

      1. George Perez Avatar
        George Perez

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/80c92ca53f1bd8afad790eb97a90025dd52c0cb0804ca728828c8e2b37d9b147.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/adbdcf30973c25f617b0e429ba652d8ea30a37d2613da21d574f07ea1e1860ed.jpg Thank you Josh, I’m basically new to coin collecting and all honest feedback is appreciated. You wouldn’t happen to know about Roman coins? I have this one coin I think I’ve dated to about 200 ad or so.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, George —

          Welcome to the hobby! I’m unfortunately not a specialist in Roman coins, but I suggest trying out this cool and well-known ancient/Roman coin web community: https://numismatics.org/ocre/

          If you have any other questions, please let me know and I’ll help as best I can!

          Happy collecting,
          Josh

          1. George Perez Avatar
            George Perez

            Again thank you.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, James —

      Yes, this coin was altered after it left the mint. It appears the edge of the coin was buffed away by, perhaps, a sanding device. I can tell this is not a mint error because the only way the sides of the coin would be flat is if it was a broadstrike and not struck in the coin’s retaining collar. However, the rim of the coin is upset (normal), so that isn’t possible. I also note a bevy of heavy contact marks on the coin and other damage.

      Still, that’s a neat find!
      Josh

      1. James Rocco Rodia Avatar
        James Rocco Rodia

        I noticed one more thing about the coin, it is double the thickness of a quarter? seems very strange..

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, James —

          Yes, the edge looks to have been manipulated and perhaps “spooned” — a method in which a blunt tool presses the edge of the coin upward. Very unusual but unfortunately not an error. I think it’s still a neat piece to hold aside. I would, anyway…

          Best wishes,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Mileena —

      It appear someone ground down or buffed off the reeding from this coin. I can tell this is a post-mint alteration and not an error, because if this had been a broadstrike, in which the reeded edges are not applied to the coins, then the rim would not be fully formed as it is here. While this piece is worth face value, it is still a neat find.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Nina —

      It looks like someone took a sharp nail to this coin and struck the penny multiple times. There are many other forms of damage on this coin, too. This piece is worth face value, but it’s nonetheless an interesting find!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  121. Erica Lynn Avatar
    Erica Lynn

    Hello Josh,
    Back at it again and I found some interesting ones, lets hope you have good news for me. 1st one was a washington quarter is this a D over a P? . https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0555e915e02a4746f44d1223954f4d0eb1ff83e01eb5514f71c1f22db76a1413.png

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Erica!

      I kindly need a vital piece of info to help further… What year is on this coin? Looks like a possible repunched mintmark but knowing the date will help me know more…

      Thanks,
      Josh

      1. Erica Lynn Avatar
        Erica Lynn

        1996

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            The light doubling is mechanical doubling, and the lines on the 2008 Alaska quarter are unfortunately just post-mint damage.

            Keep on looking! 🙂
            -Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Thanks, Erica… That was borderline from when the US Mint ended punching mintmarks onto the working dies. To me, this looks like a possible repunched mintmark, or a D/D. Do you see doubling on any other parts of the coin, or just the mintmark?

          1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            This is really helpful… Seeing doubling elsewhere on this coin, which means it was machine doubled. It’s still a neat coin though!

            Thank you for sending these images along. Really helps in making the conclusive “diagnosis”!

            Cheers,
            Josh

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            Of these it appears the mintmark on the 1978-D cent might be filled, possibly being a die chip or RPM, but not sure which of these if already attributed. That might be worth sending to Lincoln RPM expert Chuck Daughtrey at coppercoins.com for attribution. The other coins appear to have machine doubling.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

          3. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            The only photo that seems to show a possible error is the last, the 1968-D, which does seem to show signs of being repunched (note the inner loop of the mintmark). The other coins all show varying degrees of post-Mint damage causing the appearance of doubling, off-center strike, etc.

            Do hang onto that 1968-D penny, for it does look like a variety! Similar pieces can bring $2-5.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

          4. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hello Joshua
            I have found this penny from 1966 and it looks as if Lincoln’s head is a tad on the larger side, as well as his ear looks to be missing. 1971 is the second coin that I have listed looks to be DD? 1958 the third coin is also a DD? Please let me know what you think about these coins thank you
            Erica
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d813634adb5db18e1701aab003bad738fece21320a5c71d5558b7aebfe1166e4.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/731715d6d29217f94a04d2520aff059ade8ae5e9ec1959a1262cd3e5958abb9e.jpg
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/552f4a682d2293b85b9db841c4c0011ba365bc40ef73ef4a13f5312461ebab09.jpg

          5. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            I would really need to please see the entire obverse and reverse of this 1979 penny to give a proper opinion on what is going on with this coin. But it seems to exhibit heavy wear; such wear would cause the “L” in “LIBERTY” and the “VDB” to be obliterated.

            Looks like this coin has seen a lot of life in 41 years!
            Josh

          6. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            I’d need to see the entire obverse of the 1966 penny to make a judgement on the size of Lincoln’s head, but his ear appears to be missing through heavy wear here. Meanwhile, both the 1958 and 1971 pennies seem to exhibit common machine doubling; FYI, the main area of doubling on the highly valuable 1958 penny is in the word LIBERTY.

            Hope this info is helpful!
            Josh

          7. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            would this increase the value of these coins
            and i will take a better picture of the 1966 for you and send it momentarily

          8. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi Erica,

            Machine doubling? As a general rule, no… Machine doubling does not normally increase the value of coins, but that’s not to say there isn’t a collector who’d pay a premium to buy coins with machine doubling.

            Best,
            Josh

          9. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            That glob of metal near Roosevelt’s mouth doesn’t appear consistent with any type of die matters and may be post-Mint in nature. Perhaps a drop of solder? It might be worth sending those pics to the variety and error experts at CONECA (varietyvista.com) for a second opinion.

            The 1997-P Washington quarter seems to have a moderate degree of post-Mint damage and perhaps some light machine doubling, the latter of which would not add any extra value to the coin.

            Thank you for reaching out!
            Josh

          10. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hello Joshua this is the best I could get of the 1966 Lincoln head shot https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0843db690ff09bd570ecda19148072f882a92ee922179b372b6b2bcf457c6733.png

          11. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            Thanks for the photo of the 1966 cent… From what I see here, Lincoln’s head and other major details appear to be normal for this date.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

          12. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hello Joshua this is the best I could get of the 1966 Lincoln head shot https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0843db690ff09bd570ecda19148072f882a92ee922179b372b6b2bcf457c6733.png

  122. Cheryl Teyssier Avatar
    Cheryl Teyssier

    My husband found a penny you can make out Lincolnwith no details, the date, but the surface is smooth as a babies bottom. It’s the same on the back is this an error coin, or something else?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Cheryl —

      Sounds like an interesting coin! I’ll need to please see a couple clear photos of this coin to help though and provide a definitive answer.

      Thank you!
      Josh

  123. chelsea branch Avatar
    chelsea branch

    Hi josh! What do you think?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Chelsea —

      I’m afraid this is post-Mint damage. The coin is worth face value, but it’s nevertheless eye popping!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Chelsea —

          This looks like a badly damaged example to me and it is therefore worth face value.

          Interesting find though!
          Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Chelsea —

          I’m thinking this is a minor grease-filled die error here obscuring the “G” of “GOD” and “T” of “TRUST.” Hold it aside as it might be worth a buck or two to the right collector willing to buy it.

          Nice find!
          Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Chelsea,

          Oh geez, this Roosevelt dime looks like it was attacked by a belt sander or something. Definitely a post-mint damage situation here. It’s worth face value.

          Best wishes,
          Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Chelsea —

          This Georgia quarter appears to have some post-mint damage; it’s worth face value.

          Best regards,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Dee —

      This is a 1982-D large date penny, which is common and worth about 2 cents for its copper value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Dee —

          I’m afraid this is, too, is a 1982-D large date…

          Keep on looking!
          -Josh

  124. John Wilson Avatar
    John Wilson

    Hello Josh, Hopeing you could take a look at this penny and give your thoughts. Complete date and mint mark area. Reverse closely spaced AM. Thanks for your consideration. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/28b9c974ab4307c2c5389de52b1844150fca9dcff86c10dac5388210d4ae2e18.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e8fcb655bf5f4d8e9a16c3da4fc7dde7c079e3e237cabf894e672ec4b4f8ce78.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, John —

      Wide AM or Close AM (it’s a Wide AM here) really has little bearing on this right now because the date isn’t even legible, so we wouldn’t know if the Wide or Close AM is supposed to be common or rare for this piece. I can’t seem to make out the date in this image, and if I had to make a determination as to what’s going on here, I’d say it’s a grease-filled die error. I feel confident about this because the rest of the coin appears well struck and I don’t seem to see any signs of tooling or other post-mint damage in the area of the fourth numeral of the date.

      If sold to the right collector — one who specializes in errors and varieties — it could be worth anywhere from $1 to maybe $3 or $5. Definitely a keeper.

      Neat find,
      Josh

  125. Jon Baldovin Avatar
    Jon Baldovin

    Hi Josh!
    I have a couple of coins if you wouldnt mind taking a look…the first one is a penny that im pretty sure is post mind damage (but want to make sure before i discard it) and the other one is a 1970 d mint dime…it looks like a silver dime in that it has a complete silver rim as opoosed to the line of copper that you normally see with post 1964 coins. Thanks in advance https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/df6c3b1dcb0cf0cc518251166043077b119d7c571732d21049238007ea30df44.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/77bc685d0b6a7c631683356c7356a050ecff06aedad836f881e2638c8794cf58.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7a40267a4ef049a66f7e28c26b4e45da38617d7eb6d898a815a82f67c51cdbfc.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b239ee30b2c3f8cd8785f922afbf8b8cde0dfeda0b9d3b209ce6c73fad9ec983.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jon —

      Your guess is correct on the Lincoln cent — it’s post-mint damage. While I see the absence of any appearance of copper in the rim, the coloration of the dime otherwise looks like a regular clad dime. HOWEVER, the best way to determine whether or not a coin is an off-metal error is to weigh it. A silver dime should weigh about 2.5 grams, whereas a clad dime weighs closer to 2.24 grams. So, if you can get a weight on this coin, we’ll know much more about it!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  126. Baby Jay Avatar
    Baby Jay

    Theres something strange with that 1964 one all the way to the right.. its like it feels different.. heavier maybe.. and it feels like it has no rim.. or i dont know something is funny about it overall or its just off.. I dont know I just got into looking at coins the other day so can you all notice anything? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/470b8fcb5716ae6ec7472ef7d9d3b75bf28ed4251cb85b8c276f9abe5be9f598.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c70b44d48a6aab65d010d80cd6d39b8114229c7eff39bc848967882edb9a0a50.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8745dfc2272b7b7282d6632d757d188aa6c0a09021aef518f2797ad05c858c0b.jpg

  127. Baby Jay Avatar
    Baby Jay

    center when they are stacked and then right when they are not

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Nikki —

      Your 1945-S Mercury dime is worth about $2, while the 1941-S and 1952-D quarters have a value of about $3.50 to $4 apiece.

      I’m not well versed in ancient coins, so I don’t want to misguide you on checking for the authenticity diagnostics on the Athena coin. I suggest perusing the boards at Ancient Coin Forum for more information: https://www.forumancientcoins.com/

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Richard —

      On the 1958 penny, there’s a die chip between the “9” and “5.” Here’s more info about die chips and their value: https://uscoinsguide.com/die-crack-error-coins-to-look-for/

      The 1983 penny appears to have a repunched mintmark, but I would suggest getting someone more knowledgeable on those to give you a second opinion. Here’s more info about repunched mintmarks: https://uscoinsguide.com/repunched-mint-marks/
      And somebody who may be able to attribute your coin: https://coppercoins.com/

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  128. Gary Brannon Avatar
    Gary Brannon

    Hi I have a quarter with a bubble I would like you to look at.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Gary —

      Thank you for reaching out… Bubbles like that are generally caused by exposure of the coin to intense heat, such as a fire. In your case, the coin is also quite dark, another common thing we see with coins that have been in fires. Assuming this to be the case, your coin is worth face value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  129. Veronica Avatar
    Veronica

    I have a 1969 D mint Lincoln cent with Lincoln’s ear abnormally long. I heard of the double earlobe, but this one is a little different. Can you tell me if this is of any value? Thanks in advance https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/22d0ad658a3740420c036a68b695f806cd6f3f99d61a7705c6fd5db9f17fa57f.png i

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Veronica —

      What I seem to see is a bit of damage, and it seems to have distorted Lincoln’s ear. So, I don’t think this is an error. It is, however, worth about two cents for its copper value — so a little better than face value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  130. Dèè Noble Avatar
    Dèè Noble

    Hello Josh wanted to get help with my 1982 D penny

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Dee —

      Based on the photo you posted of your 1982-D penny, I’m aftaid it’s the common large date.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  131. Matt Miller Avatar
    Matt Miller

    Can anyone tell me about A 1962 penny that looks like a chip of a different penny is imbedded

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Matt —

      Could you please post clear photos of this coin so I can help you further?

      Thank you,
      Josh

  132. B ES Avatar
    B ES

    Hi Josh —
    Really enjoy your site, thanks for all the information for us newbies!!!
    Was wondering if you have any thoughts about this 1951 D Wheat penny, specifically the “D” in UNITED and reverse.
    Thank you in advance for your thoughts.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, BES —

      Thank you for your kind comments! We always appreciate them and are glad to help! While your 1951-D exhibits some light to moderate damage on the back, the “D” mintmark appears that it may be doubled/repunched. Pieces like that are collectible and usually worth about $1 to $3.

      Cool find!
      Josh

      1. B ES Avatar
        B ES

        Hi Josh —
        Thanks so much for the info. Really appreciate your site and wisdom.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re so welcome, BES! I’m most happy to help!

          Cheers,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Oh, here’s the photo (ha ha).

      Yes, that’s a post-mint alteration, though probably used as merchant token or coupon. I’d hang on to it as these are collected by some folks, and they often fetch a buck or two.

      The Peace dollar is worth currently worth about $17, and the Booker T. Washington commemorative half dollar has a value of about $10 in its condition.

      Nice collection!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Lynn —

      Unfortunately, those deep gouges on the back of your penny are from post-mint damage and are not errors caused by the mint. It’s safe to spend this at face value if you wish. I do hope you keep looking for coin errors! They really are out there…

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Lynn Hughes Avatar
        Lynn Hughes

        Thank you again, and I plan to keep looking.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Wishing you the best of luck in your searching!
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Lynn —

      The 1989-P Roosevelt dime exhibit post-mint rim damage, the 1953-D Lincoln cent has a soft strike and heavy wear (the former isn’t an error, just a poorer striking job), and the 1978-D penny shows some surface scuffing from after the coin was minted. Overall no errors here, but keep your eyes peeled for more of the things that look abnormal. There are some cool errors to be found!

      Good luck,
      Josh

      1. Lynn Hughes Avatar
        Lynn Hughes

        thanks so much, I really appreciate it, and I will.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re welcome, Lynn!
          Josh

  133. Juanita Avatar
    Juanita

    Wow is any still on here

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Is any what, Juanita?

      Best,
      Josh

  134. Felicia Wood Moreno Avatar
    Felicia Wood Moreno

    We found a 1920 penny with part of Lincoln’s head missing. Would this likely be an error or post-mint damage? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dbebce1412f43c443bb57d4e0da691723c3b6b94d9178ce8f49796c63e27281a.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Felicia —

      Unfortunately, your coin exhibits extreme post-Mint wear and damage, so this is it an error. I’ll tell you though, it’s a pretty weird-looking piece!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  135. Felicia Wood Moreno Avatar
    Felicia Wood Moreno

    We also found a 1961 dime that has some unusual striking on both the front and the back. Wondering how to tell if this is an error or damage?
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6a9ac4cbac5b2ad63b4f02bcfcfad0ed390b9478d272c5baf19a6b900621c031.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/633c53d2e066df19a8f15659cdbb2f7ca60e4cbbe5c9982b2e9b15f2300e3b19.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Felicia —

      This is post-mint damage/alterations. There’s a circular/torquing nature to the damage, leading me to think it may specifically be from some type of machine damage. The coin is at least still worth its silver content value of about $1.50!

      An interesting find nonetheless!
      Josh

      1. Felicia Wood Moreno Avatar
        Felicia Wood Moreno

        Thank you!

  136. Kathy Avatar
    Kathy

    Hi Joshua,

    My husband was a coin collector as a kid. I found some of his coins. One is iridescent. Others have errors. Strikes across Lincoln’s face. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/609471c43b43ca06d6d999bd8163c76deef08a61650dd3a66a050f8fd1d64903.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0c779014ccfa0d6375bd8fd8a04bff4e459ab120757515faf90403c5f773e719.jpg He has several V.db pennies.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/edfa2ffd27f1e6b8fab60960f2d2092729821c73590727576923b10b077b2f62.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/edfa2ffd27f1e6b8fab60960f2d2092729821c73590727576923b10b077b2f62.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/08bf36c16f74d00eb8e313f67df851f378cc4d9cb7f4639203748d61560e6ac6.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2a803282f11dba850e4b1b9bc7defaa0773313f96953780709d40ed270a9225a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/91cadc2f4f96369a609c080a1860e561cf260153739e50b43ba6ba97440ce856.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b5fef30269703e8a819752b95b270b2a3bdc188f2a20f06e429c483a9d052f97.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/82a0c37b1dafae514dfe362468f74715f7b334f7326a4a4a2abe9a2596e4863a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/54d320059aec9078f1a4cfa77996f18f4f8a04b62b7824888f5c3d96a943a5ab.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/91cadc2f4f96369a609c080a1860e561cf260153739e50b43ba6ba97440ce856.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/74da370e224fbf540258dd5977abd0ed6b6d0f1e41bd908c3ae68257c51c9053.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fc4a1ea5455859eaee1bf7c59f7196fe362bf65e4004c1ba5376f0929383ac1e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/19233a5c56aa3aaff887eddb044be42ca9a625ff5ac0db0c076f3542fed9e335.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Kathy —

      Your husband’s collection is a neat set… Here’s a rundown on what I see here:

      *1909-VDB penny — $7-10
      *1918-D penny — 10-20 cents
      *1982-D large date penny bronze — 2 cents
      *1989-D penny with scrapes (post-mint damage) — 1 cent
      *1943 Walking Liberty half dollar — $6-7
      *Peace dollar (what date?) — Worth at least $14 depending on the coin’s date

      Hope this info helps!
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Shane —

      Unfortunately this is an altered piece designed as a two-tailed novelty coin fashioning together the backsides (or reverses) of two authentic quarters. While a neat piece, it has no numismatic value, though sometimes these pieces will trade as curiosities for a couple dollars.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Sheena —

      It looks like someone took a bench grinder to the edge of your quarter, sanding off the edge reeding and blunting the edges to expose the copper core within the coin. While it’s definitely a looker, it’s unfortunately an altered piece that is worth face value.

      Do keep an eye out for the somewhat similar-looking broadstrike coins — pieces without their edge reeding or edge lettering due to strike error. Here’s more info: https://uscoinsguide.com/quarter-without-ridges-value/

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  137. Alli Avatar
    Alli

    Hi Joshua,
    Coin newbie here. I recently inherited several thousand coins from my father and am going through the daunting task of inventorying/cataloging them and determining which, if any, have some special value. I came across this 1944-D penny with some kind of a raised mint error near the rim. Am wondering if this should be set aside as having value or just get tossed back in the pile. Thanks!

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5e8c20bb14ba3e0a03b35f5692ccd0bbe6935b1f1af1e26a634130c2280466b6.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Alli —

      Thank you for reaching out! Unfortunately, that rim issue isn’t an error but rather post-Mint damage. While it’s still worth 2 or 3 cents as a well-worn, obsolete 1944-D cent it’s not anything particularly special.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Alli Avatar
        Alli

        Thanks for your reply! Oh well. I’ve got over 11,000 coins including nickels (Buffalo & Wartime) , dimes ( Barber, Mercury, pre-’64 Roosevelt), quarters (Barber, Standing Liberty, 1930s & up), silver dollars (Morgan, Peace, Susan B), half dollars (Walking Liberty, Franklin, pre-& post-’64 Kennedy), pennies (1940 & beyond), and complete collection coin books too. I figure there has to be some gems in there somewhere! 🙂

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          There may be, Alli! Good luck finding some!

          Cheers,
          Josh

  138. Ray Thompson Avatar
    Ray Thompson

    Hey Josh hru , idk but It is clearly a 2 over another 2 and it fully looks like a small date 2 with a large date 2 over . I realize that there is not one to speak of but it is possible , being i have Lg & Sm dates from Denver mint .It’s light but its there is this what it is looking like??? weight 3.01 Grams .I have fully zoomed in flipped this way that way and the bottom 2 is there the curved neck and hooked inward top heck i know its a whatt but I think maybe found something here your in put has been spot on and brother whats your thoughts here???

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/691a776973f6f60335cc4e53b01bb969cee6caf269f64b9202f00508e964268c.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/64739e46ae0121b7dc7d7a69538f0f01b922c0e8de77c6fa81a501002ba46d5b.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f4a345c0aa5bcb8bcc04c816672f2d9faa76924302ab3cae2c2d070d6e1067d0.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dbafd65fc181ff3d0f0a6f5344565849086132fcf2c40088d7efc66f15dd8b35.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c0529cd37a6dbdc82fd10ddcf11f0266774cbed3cd6558f0b5a5642f7ced9a48.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b7a264eccd7833093b848bdaef34b01f202f38a7ce5c78c1976f47541eedbcc1.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Coin Man —

      Many of the markings in, on, and around the date and mintmark appear to be related to post-Mint issues rather than a die variety. However, you may wish to send photos of your coins to the variety experts at CONECA (www.varietyvista.com) for a second opinion.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  139. Jl Jl Avatar
    Jl Jl

    Ey I have this 2 coins the first one LIBERTY is not small and big letter and the second I not sure about what year is https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ec628c51fcfbc2c25b918a382834e0504a0fd2d946898b443fa7eee5f0220472.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jl —

      There is some weakness in the second Lincoln cent but there is also light surface damage across the coin and that appears to be part of the obliteration issue. Based on what I’m seeing here both of these coins are safe to spend.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jl —

      While a 1999 Wide AM penny is the rarity among the circulating cents of that period (as I describe here: https://uscoinsguide.com/1999-penny-value/), if you find a 1999-S proof penny with Close AM you’ve scored a winner!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, John —

      I agree this is most likely a 1973-D Lincoln cent…Best as I can tell, this piece is heavily corroded and exhibits severe post-Mint damage. However, it would still be worth about 2 cents for its copper content value.

      Interesting find,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, BES—

      Everything is going well, thanks! I hope the same for you and yours…

      Unfortunately the images you sent here do show marked damage — scraping, specifically — across the reverse lettering. This piece is still worth its copper content value of about two cents.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

      1. B ES Avatar
        B ES

        thanks for response. Take care

  140. B ES Avatar
    B ES

    Hi again, Josh –
    This 1984 penny has four holes near the rim, above Liberty on obverse and
    in same area on reverse under “United”, as well as on the steps and the roof.
    They look like white dots in photos but they are holes.
    Post mint damage?
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3935f653639e419b2df2063720d68cbb3334acb8e53e48b3da8337b679b1ec3e.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/12826d7fe1c066e179fe26995d4e11e8ccd2d5b28d57a45e6cf0a4bbc0ef4158.jpg

    As always, thank you for your time and expertise.
    Best regards

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, BES —

      Yes, this is post-Mint damage… Just a rule of thumb, basically anything and everything going IN to a coin — with very few exceptions — Is post-Mint damage.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. B ES Avatar
        B ES

        Thanks for response, Josh.
        Was pretty sure that was the case, based on the info you have provided in these pages, but sometimes the damage is unique enough that I want to make sure.
        Not sure why people spend the time and energy to damage the coins.
        Best regards

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          It’s beyond me as well!
          -Josh

  141. Richard Avatar
    Richard

    Hi Joshua, https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/96436e02f8a5a25b2759871343b6ba4dd8062caab705eee1094f0b529f8a6728.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e71ed347d6e0bcde226ca12d5f8ba13599268303f480e0f4dbc8fe274be4b9d4.jpg Hope you’re doing well. I don’t know if my eyes are playing tricks on me, but I appears to me that the mink marks on these 1937 are all located in different positions. Is this ‘normal’?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Richard —

      Yes, the mintmark is in slightly different positions on each of those coins and — yes — that’s normal. The mintmark punch was struck onto each die by hand throughout the 1980s, and across potentially hundreds of different dies used to strike these coins each year, you’re going to see some shifts in exactly where the mintmark wound up under the date on the penny. There really isn’t any value premium for mintmark position, though there is for doubled mintmarks, sideways mintmarks, etc.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  142. Erica Lynn Avatar
    Erica Lynn

    Hello, Joshua I have a 1972 dd i thought might be worth the look at from you please tell me what you think
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/33361845b0b008dbc90652f2135abbcec11b3ac00b49b48cdc1a989d03c078ed.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Erica —

      Not sure how distinct any doubling appears in-person but in the photo it looks like common — and only very light — machine doubling, unfortunately not a doubled die.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Erica Lynn Avatar
        Erica Lynn

        thank you and i will keep looking ty

        1. Erica Lynn Avatar
          Erica Lynn

          Hello Joshua I have found this washington quarter with the mint mark filled in does this increase value? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a67858298cb693320a922aa03fcae7f59f894469d7df3a35378fa3c27fef84e5.jpg

          1. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hello Joshua would this nickel be considered and error with what appears to be a die crack? maybe ? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/99629814201f484c060f3d3c797de9d9e83be9d406de58b9200350b93fed6e1f.jpg

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            It’s a little hard to tell with this single photo. It does look something like a die crack here, though it does appear to be prouder to the surface than the rim. Maybe another couple clear photos, including one of the entire reverse/tail’s side would help.

            Thank you,
            Josh

          3. Juanita Avatar
            Juanita

            Hello I’m Juanita and I have came across two Nichols
            The first 1. Is a 1991 D and it has some strange marking on it and was wondering if maybe you can let me know what they might be.

            Second 1. 2005 D Liberty very shiny and something strange on the back I can’t really make it out maybe a mountain.

            Third 1. Is a very very old quarter but I cannot make out the date on it it looks like it has two faces on one side

            Thank you I look forward to hearing from you

          4. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Juanita —

            I’d be glad to assist; if you could upload a few clear images of your coins in the comments section here I’ll take a look. You should be able to upload JPGs that are less than 2 mb each.

            Thank you,
            Josh

          5. Juanita Avatar
            Juanita

            How can I upload the pictures

          6. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hello, Juanita —

            Please refer to my answer/reply on your earlier post!

            Thank you and good luck,
            Josh

          7. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hello Joshua,
            Sorry it took so long to respond but here is the nickel I was talking about . ://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7e78e93722c760d3e06dad8f18bd82a22af77dff3331e4a687e0cb67e39c1121.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fa43aabe842975cf24beb362a1e88e35cff66dbc373a16e620f46dd50944fbd0.jpg

          8. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            From what I can tell here this is a pretty deep post-Mint cut across the coin.

            Thanks for following up!
            Josh

          9. Erica Lynn Avatar
            Erica Lynn

            Hello Joshua,
            Well I have a bunch of coins I have some questions about so to make it easy I will label them 1-2-3 and so on so if you would like when you respond you can refer to the coins by number. Ok first up #1 I found this quarter it is a 1983 Washington and to me it looks as if this might have been over stamped with a different coin front. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fd67ab909b8b9f5eb7d804f8d3dd5c363a6ef10d50126aa667563cf8a9348903.jpg

          10. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            Unfortunately this quarter exhibits significant corrosion and some deep scratches; it is worth face value.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

          11. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            Looks like it is a die chip in the mintmark… There are some collectors who might pay a nominal premium for something like this, perhaps 50 cents to a dollar.

            Neat find,
            Josh

          12. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Erica —

            This coin has some heavy post-Mint damage partially resulting in the rim being pushed inward upon the coin; it almost appears to be a so-called “dryer coin.” There’s more info about that here: https://www.coincommunity.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=143863

            Thank you for reaching out,
            Josh

  143. Ryan Schoonover Avatar
    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Ryan!

      Congratulations on this awesome cud find! Here’s more info on cud coins and what they’re worth: https://uscoinsguide.com/die-cud-error-coins-list/

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Erica —

      On pre-1990 coins like this, apparent doubling on the date AND the mintmark is the giveaway it’s NOT a doubled die. Why? Because back then the mintmark was hand-punched onto the die after the die was hubbed, so it would therefore be impossible to see hub doubling on the mintmark. This piece is exhibiting machine doubling and, while a neat find, isn’t really worth anything extra.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Erica —

      Yes it is — post-Mint damage with some corrosion. Oh well!

      Have a great day,
      Josh

  144. Nadine Laxen Avatar

    Hello, I have a 1977 dime no mint mark. The coin looks like it is in perfect condition. When I put it under a microscope there is a strike from the date, trust, and God. The base of Roosevelt has a cut. The word Liberty is cut through slightly seperated. On the reverse the We has a break in it. Posting photos to follow: Nadine

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Nadine —

      I saw the photo you posted of the 1977 dime and the anomalies you mentioned are all unfortunately post-Mint damage. A general rule of thumb is that anything weird or unusual you see cutting IN to the coin’s surface or its lettering is most often just damage. This piece is worth face value and safe to spend.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  145. Robert Lahrmer Avatar
    Robert Lahrmer

    Hello,
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9149737d26d4a1f38f65458e57ebe1186fd6bca37336d08e1a2616b150428b15.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8d21def5fb9c715bb40f62ccbd88fb62e594405d6dd773fd1b104f0c6a275217.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0dcd0efeb3df8a48cd93547e30a097597c7b5f36f643808b390be41b9a2636df.jpg I am finally getting around to cleaning out my desk and I found a coin that I had been saving. Hoping you can shed some light and let me know if it has any value greater than face value. The coin appearance is like new but the face appears to be spun and does not look like post-mint damage.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Robert —

      While this is a neat-looking piece, it unfortunately has a form of concentrated/applied post-mint damage. Though worth face value it is nevertheless an interesting find to hang onto!

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Richard —

      It looks like there’s a die break in the bottom half of those two Rs. There are folks who may offer a small premium for a variety like that! Here’s more info on what die breaks are and what various types can be worth: https://uscoinsguide.com/die-crack-error-coins-to-look-for/

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Courtney —

      What you have here is a 2002-P Roosevelt dime that has either been “spooned” or is what we in the hobby call a “dryer coin.” In either case, the edge of the coin has been pushed up (after the coin left the mint) by the application of extreme pressure. In spooning, the metal is forced up with a blunt tool. In the case of it being a “dryer coin,” the piece was exposed to extreme centrifugal force inside something such as a clothes dryer after the coin rolled along its edge at very high speeds inside the cylinder.

      While it’s hard to say exactly what action happened here, we can rule out that this is a mint error, as such an anomaly would’ve been mechanically impossible at the mint given the parameters that this coin is slightly narrower than normal, has a rim, and a completely struck and centered design.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

      1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
        JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

        Hi, Michael —

        I’m not sure what you’re looking for here, but this appears to be a normal 1938 Mercury dime as far as I can tell in this image. I don’t see any errors, doubling, etc. the horizontal lines in the fasces bands (which appear to go up and down here in this sideways view) are only partially split so it’s not a a Full Bands strike, either. Unless I’m missing something you see on your end, this is an otherwise normal, circulated 1938 Mercury dime worth about $3.

        Hope I can help further,
        Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Michael —

      The doubling you see on this 1969-S Lincoln penny unfortunately isn’t from being struck by a doubled die but rather is minor mechanical doubling from the striking process itself, which is common and doesn’t add any extra value to the coin. One way to note the difference is that the doubled die has notching on the serifs and is distinct from the primary design elements, whereas here the doubling appears to smear out and away from the main design and lettering/date numerals.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jessica —

      If I may ask, what stood out as “strange” to you? While I see some nicks, scratches and other post-mint damage, I don’t seem to see any evidence of doubled dies or other hubbing/strike issues in these two photos…

      I hope to help further,
      Josh

      1. Jessica Avatar
        Jessica

        Well, it looked just like the elusive copper one that’s worth a a lot

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Jessica —

          One key way to make a determination on whether a zinc-era Lincoln cent is copper is by weighing it with a scale that measures in increments of at least a tenth of a gram. A zinc cent weighs 2.5 grams while bronze cents will register at 3 or 3.1 grams.

          Hope this helps… Good luck!
          -Josh

  146. Jarrod Boone Avatar
    Jarrod Boone

    Hey I found a 1973 quarter with and odd MM. Just wanted to know your thoughts on it?

    1. Jarrod Boone Avatar
      Jarrod Boone

      Instead of a MM it just has a circle indentation that is recessed. It won’t let me upload the image for some reason…If you click on my profile. The image of the quarter is used as my avatar..

    2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jarrod —

      Unfortunately your avatar photo is not allowing me to enlarge or zoom in on it. Would you please attach the image to one of your comments here in the thread so it can be enlarged on my end?

      Thank you!
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Jarrod —

          Thank you for submitting the closeup photo of your quarter; the circle around the mintmark is a halo of some kind that was counterstamped on the coin after it left the mint.

          Best wishes,
          Josh

          1. Jarrod Boone Avatar
            Jarrod Boone

            Great! Thanks for the help and information!

      1. Jarrod Boone Avatar
        Jarrod Boone

        I know this is still a bit blurry, but it does give a better view of the MM in question. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks!

  147. Gold Eagle Avatar
    Gold Eagle

    Hello Josh!! how are you? I think I found an error, lol I do not know, what do you think? look at rim and date. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f0b9042e61660c6c201e2821603fd7434f099925618d12313dd04eeb601c89bb.png

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Gold Eagle —

      From what I see in the photo it appears the lines across the date and elsewhere along the cameo inset is a gouge — possibly a circular scrape most likely originating from machine damage (vending machine or coin-counting machine, quite likely).

      At least that’s the best insight I can offer based on the photo…

      Best,
      Josh

      1. Gold Eagle Avatar
        Gold Eagle

        I would never though of that, this is why I needed to show you, next time I see something like this I will know. THANK YOU!!!!

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re most welcome! Glad I could help!

  148. Blenda Springer Avatar
    Blenda Springer

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2aaef7414cfefc05f4ea8c5ae0cc9bfe2f360526eb434dcb30b866a439004ea0.jpg

    I’m curious about this coin. It also has a sort of raised area. The coin itself doesn’t seem to be very worn or damaged.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Blenda —

          Seeing the bubbling on this part of that damaged coin is also strongly indicative that it was exposed to intense heat… It was possibly in a fire.

          Thank you for reaching out,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Brenda —

      This coin sustained damage to its edge, and the brown color you’re seeing is the coin’s copper core exposed through the chunk of metal that has been removed. Given that this is post-Mint damage and the coin is circulated without any precious metals or errors present, it is worth face value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Gregory —

      Unfortunately this coin has heavy damage imparted after it left the mint. While it’s worth face value, I’m thinking the story this coin could tell would be priceless!

      Thanks for reaching out,
      Josh

      1. Gregory Parks Avatar
        Gregory Parks

        I wish that you could see it in person. It has no rub marks and the edge looks original

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi Gregory,

          While I don’t take in-hand submissions, if you’d like a second opinion consider submitting your coin to a third-party coin grading service or having a coin dealer examine it. Here’s more info on both options:

          Third-party coin grading: https://uscoinsguide.com/slabbed_coins/
          How to find a good coin dealer: https://uscoinsguide.com/coin_dealer/

          Best wishes,
          Josh

  149. Sharon Velardi Avatar
    Sharon Velardi

    Hi Joshua
    I am not a coin collector. I am just someone that likes to look for that valuable coin in my pocket change. I found a 1987 D quarter missing the letters ‘IBUS’ on the reverse side. I couldn’t find any info about this particular coin. Im assuming its most likely a grease strike thru error. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks, Sharon https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f3c010dd0cbf75ab56209e34e3d6203bf4d532e0d0853d31c410d38b14e4f54d.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Sharon!

      Yep, that’s exactly what this looks like — a grease-filled strike-through error! Nice find… Something like this could score a few bucks from an interested collector!

      Cheers,
      Josh

  150. Don Deibler Avatar
    Don Deibler

    The article states, “The U.S. Mint doesn’t make colored coins. In fact, any colorized U.S. coins that you see have been altered by somebody outside of the Mint.” This is no longer true due to the fact that In August 2020, the U.S. Mint releases its first colorized coins as part of the Basketball Hall of Fame Commemorative Coin Program.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Don —

      Yes indeed, this article was written several years ago! Thanks for the kind note!

      Best,
      Josh

  151. Coin Finder Avatar
    Coin Finder

    Hi,
    I have a 1987 p quarter dollar but it seems like the coin got melted or it’s just damage. Please respond so I know if it’s a rare find or just a damaged coin. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bd42d80c2d59b8435d073bd2610d69f0450f0d41936b028e1b481413fd8f7508.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f6b45bf0ab77a485c0bd2c1886b920467188edefed9609409a07620bd912c567.jpg Thanks!

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Coin Finder —

      This 1987-P quarter shows extensive surface damage and is safe to spend at face value.

      Thanks for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Richard —

      This is certainly a weakly struck Lincoln cent! As best as I can tell it looks like a 1922-D based on the appearance of a flat horizontal line at the base of the fourth digit, which is almost completely obliterated. If this is a 1922-D (and maybe a close in-hand evaluation would be best here), this coin is worth around $7, as this is a scarcer issue.

      Hope this helps,
      Josh

  152. Miguel Gonzalez Avatar
    Miguel Gonzalez

    Hi Joshua, is this some type of broadstrike? The penny has what appears to be a ledge… visible across the top letters. And it appears to be slightly concave… it does not lay completely flat. The observe is slightly concave and the reverse a bit convex. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9e974b456c0ead16e3f86315f0853e8d07f51e1da40b3103c79f6f9308daa658.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Miguel —

      A broadstrike occurs when as coin is struck outside of its collar, thus making it flatter and wider than normal. That’s not the case here, though… The little raised ridge within the rim is due to die deterioration and doesn’t really add any extra monetary value to this piece.

      Thanks for reaching out!
      Josh

  153. Annette Avatar
    Annette

    Hi Josh-I do not see this coin listed anywhere as an error coin but to me it seems the imprinting was not right. Can you look at it please. It is only on the front https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c8c760a2bf3607937ff6040533025bf9dd088b094057c378e052ff8484067bff.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e78315676050a83dabb5500241b65e527110cae48dd7d77b1afb7d86973d3abd.jpg

  154. Gerald Morrison Avatar
    Gerald Morrison

    I have a Dime 1993D has circle around his face I need help

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Gerald —

      The circle around Roosevelt’s head is post-mint damage likely caused by a coin counting or vending machine. It is safe to spend this coin if you wish.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Gerald Morrison Avatar
        Gerald Morrison

        Thank you

  155. JayDee Davis Avatar

    Joshua, Please take a quick look at these articles (less than a 5min read) I understand your an expert but, these 2 articles show excellent photos of ” circumferential cuds” that have 360 degree edge cuds
    http://www.error-ref.com/circumferential-cuds/
    https://www.coinworld.com/news/precious-metals/not-all-the-cubs-avoid-in-shape-collectors-clearinghouse.html

    As stated “Circumferential cuds are extremely rare and are unknown among U.S. coins.”

    Now that you saw the other examples on those reputable websites I ask you
    Q: Do I have the only American 360 Degree (reverse) full cud and about 50% obverse ??? I can send you Lager better definition photos of my coin if you wish. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3559c068e6da67a1211b7930623c265afb68a19f573352c74c0c3aae920fd19d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7ba8d76755db2e6e13f485260ae23f2020b5268ea84b59285262f2db14495901.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f16209e6cff374812d539b1d09c8f993849fdcbd521093df3598d75c4f88f259.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/119b96a06c51f55a22f1c1dcc355336105bbcb82f60931ee12d63a2d2eaf33b0.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, JayDee —

      I’d love to help you out but I’m afraid this one is beyond my purview. It looks promising but I think the variety and error experts at CONECA (www.varietyvista.com) might be able to confirm.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  156. Jimmy Avatar
    Jimmy

    I have a 25 cent 1989.on the top were it says Liberty. On the R has some cand of meatel

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jimmy —

      The round piece of metal on top of your quarter is a post-mint alteration. While mutilated, your coin is still worth face value…

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  157. Jimmy Avatar
    Jimmy

    Can any one help me with this

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jimmy —

      Your 1965 quarter and 1996-D nickel show environmental discoloration and are worth face value. Your 1964-D Lincoln cent is worth its copper value of approximately 2 cents.

      Best,
      Josh

  158. Roselle Bazzanella Avatar
    Roselle Bazzanella

    I truly have an oddball 1982 quarter. After looking at it extensively over and over, I think I figured out what it is going across Washington’s face that is completely out of sync. But please share your thoughts with me please. Thank you. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c2be7f112108d0a0333489b184883d2c620ebd2cbe5a17682ce1f91914cb58f6.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Roselle —

      Looks like discoloration caused by environmental damage…

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  159. Leon Kardle Avatar
    Leon Kardle

    i just got an odd quarter in change from the store,it is a 2004 texas state quarter that is almost smooth on both sides,has no ridges around the rim(absolutely smooth)and is slightly smaller in circumfrence,thinner and weighs less than a normal quarter…

      1. Leon Kardle Avatar
        Leon Kardle

        wrong one this goes with the above post about the 1999 new jersey state quarter…i guess its more of a gold color than copper like a penny…

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Leon —

      Without seeing a photo of your Texas quarter I really can’t say for certain what’s going on, but the coin does sound like it has extensive wear and post-mint damage based on what you describe here.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  160. Leon Kardle Avatar
    Leon Kardle

    i also have a 1999 d or p new jersey state quarter that is the same color as a penny…not even a trace of silver(nickel)coloring on it anywhere…

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Leon —

      Coloration issues are always difficult to diagnose through images due to variances in lighting and what have you, but based on what I see here it appears your coin is goldish toned due to discoloration from environmental damage. While I’m pretty confident of this assessment, if you’d like a second opinion, I suggest getting it in-hand from a reputable coin dealer who can physically evaluate your coin.

      Good luck,
      Josh

  161. nikkimocha Avatar
    nikkimocha

    I am hoping you can answer a question I have as I cannot find it anywhere on the internet. I have two 1998 P Kennedy half dollars. I had them laying on my desk and noticed that on one coin Kennedy’s cheek appears larger than the other one. It kind of looks like he has a swollen face. In addition, one of the coins has a flat edge and the other coin has a reeded edge and in about three areas on the edges are reddish colors over the copper color edging. Can you tell me anything about these two coins?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Nikki!

      I’d be glad to offer my insights on this but would need to please see a couple clear images of the coins side by side to make a determination as to what’s going on. Images can be posted here in the comments section.

      Thank you!
      Josh

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Nikki —

          You did a fine job, so thank you for these images! I can see the rim is fully struck on both coins, including the one with the flat edge. This unfortunately rules out an error known as a broadstrike and suggests that the rim was filed down after the coin left the mint — a fairly common type of alteration.

          The reddish coloration on the edge of the other coin is discoloration due to toning and/or other environmental elements where the coin is or was once stored/located.

          I also noticed the minor strike differences rendering Kennedy’s face to look a little “swollen,” as you said. From what I see in the photo, the coin where his face is more robust in appearance looks slightly better struck to me, which might account for this. Based on how new the dies are and/or the strike pressure used, such variances can occur. But it doesn’t look unusual to me here anyway.

          I’m afraid both are worth their face value…

          I appreciate your reaching out and am sorry I didn’t have better news for you!

          Best wishes,
          Josh

          1. nikkimocha Avatar
            nikkimocha

            Thank you for your response. Mainly, I was just curious about what would cause the rim of the one coin to be flat.

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            No problem! Yes, it’s definitely a filing job of some sort by someone outside the mint.

          3. Sally Sims Avatar
            Sally Sims

            Hi Joshua can u look at my Georgia State quarter 1999 error

          4. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Sally —

            Sure thing! Please upload clear photos of your coin here and I’ll be glad to take a look.

            Thank you,
            Josh

          5. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Sally —

            Thanks for posting these photos! You have what many in the coin hobby might call a “dryer coin.” It’s a coin whose edges may have been rolled inward due to centrifugal force likely because it spun inside a clothes dryer or endured a similar situation. This effect can also be achieved by altering the edges with the blunt side of a chisel, spoon, or other implement. At any rate, this is unfortunately not a mint error and is indeed post-mint damage and worth 25 cents.

            Thank you for reaching out,
            Josh

  162. Kayla Gaines Avatar
    Kayla Gaines

    It’s been over a month since last comment so I figured I would just take a chance. I have found a little info on coins similar to this one. Is there any info you maybe able to give me on this coin. Thanks in advance

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hello, Kayla!

      I’m pleased to report you have a major die cud on your hands here. This is one of the largest I’ve ever seen posted here, if not THE largest, and I’ve been doing this at TheFunTimesGuide for 14 years. As you may know, values for errors and varieties of this manner can be dependent on the magnitude of the oddity itself, but I think this could top $150 if offered for sale and purchased by the right collector.

      Congrats,
      Josh

  163. Anthony Avatar
    Anthony

    I found this 1945 penny would appreciate any feedback. I just started collecting about a year and a half ago this is the first coin I found

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Anthony —

      Would you please post a couple clear images of your coin so I can provide further insight?

      Thank you,
      Josh

  164. Anthony Avatar
    Anthony

    There’s people who say that I altered the penny. I don’t know the first thing about altering a coin. I used to collect baseball cards n one day I saw this coin that popped up on Google so I decided to go through my granddaughters change n this one of the first coins I found https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/60f6d5bd62c31d76e7419cb828997a582c1271b8c1210301d555a184f543809d.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b6c25e8f1f543fd4acfc63a9bc7e8cd4d9e978d79486f6654ada51f053237611.jpg

  165. Anthony Avatar
    Anthony

    Thank you for getting back to me

  166. Christina Conway Avatar
    Christina Conway

    Hello! I used to work as a cashier and would keep interesting ones I found. I have a 1999 Connecticut quarter where the tree in the back is upside down. Can you tell me more about this coin?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Christina —

      Without seeing a photo of the coin it’s hard to say for sure. As all U.S. coins are struck in coin orientation (heads side up, tails side down), if you see one on which both designs are facing up, it’s most likely a counterfeit or post-mint alteration of some sort.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jamie —

      This 1977Jefferson nickel has extensive post-mint damage and is safe to spend at face value if you wish.

      Best,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jaymes —

      This quarter was altered after it left the mint… If you wish to spend it at face value, you can. However, as its obverse (head’s side) was obliterated I’m not sure you could.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, George —

      It looks like your 2017 Jefferson nickel has some extensive environmental damage and pitting, which has obscured the date and a few other details. This piece is safe to spend at face value if you wish.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. George Fox Avatar
        George Fox

        Thanks Joshua, noted damage, but does doubling on back help at all in a value? Thanks

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, George —

          I didn’t see any doubling on the back at the scale of the photo (not saying it’s not there, but I would need to view a clearer photo of the coin at a higher resolution for me to see this here). If the double image is due to doubling of the design on the die (a doubled die variety) then, yes, that would promote collectibility and value for the coin, but if it’s machine doubling (which is far more common and caused by die deterioration or the coin slipping during strike) then it would have no additional value. Here’s more info about these two kinds of doubling phenomena: https://uscoinsguide.com/machine-doubling-doubled-dies/

          Hope this helps,
          Josh

          1. Juanita Avatar
            Juanita

            Hello Good evening if you could please give some insight on this Jefferson 5 Cents 1970 it looks like two Mint Marks but how can that be.. it looks like to me D mint over S mint
            please help

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Juanita —

            It’s possible, but unfortunately the image posted is blurry upon zoom, so I can’t really make out the diagnostics well. My suggestions for further help on this piece are to please repost a clearer image here or, perhaps better yet from the standpoint of attribution, send the coin and/or clearer image to the variety experts at CONECA (https://conecaonline.org/) or Variety Vista (http://varietyvista.com/).

            Good luck!
            Josh

          3. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Juanita —

            I’m not sure about it being an S over D, but it appears that it might be a repunched mintmark of some type. A variety attribution service could further advise on this.

            Best wishes,
            Josh

  167. Michael Hill Avatar
    Michael Hill

    I have a 1974 d roosevelt dime that has a circle stamped in it…is it an error coin

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Michael —

      Most likely it is just post-mint damage but I’d be happy to check it out further if you wish to post a couple clear photos of the coin here in the forum.

      Best,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tabitha —

      The little ridge on the back of the coin under the left wheat stalk appears, in this set of photos, to be displaced metal from the rim. Overall, I’d peg the value of this moderately circulated 1956-D penny around 3 to 5 cents, which is typical for this issue in this condition.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

  168. R S Sparks Avatar
    R S Sparks

    I thought I left a message here earlier but didn’t see it so I am posting again for a possible answer to what may have happened to this 2005 Nickel? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b00eac22d098f8fa8f1875a4426456b9d7dca3587beb3a132aeca04f9de16cb8.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, RS —

      The fourth digit is likely missing due to a grease-filled die — debris clogged the fourth numeral and thus it didn’t strike up. I would caution that there’s a chance this may also be caused by a post-mint alteration in this case. There is a shadow of the “5,” there, suggesting it’s possible it was removed by someone with a little extra time on their hands, and this is a surprisingly frequent situation where oddities like this were made by idle hands. An in-hand inspection by an error specialist could check the metal texture/surface and determine if it has been altered or not.

      However, if it’s a grease-filled error, this is a fairly common type of die-related error. Still, there are some collectors who will pay a small premium for coins with missing features like this.

      Hope this info helps,
      Josh

      1. R S Sparks Avatar
        R S Sparks

        Thank you Joshua! Have a great Numis Day!

        1. Juanita Avatar
          Juanita

          On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:16 PM Loveleejuanita Lynn <

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          It’s plausible… However, without a variety expert looking at your coin in-hand and physically evaluating its surfaces, it would be numismatically impossible to say from a photo alone.

  169. kouvang vang Avatar
    kouvang vang

    Can you give me info on this coin

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi,

      I don’t see a photo with this comment to help me know which coin you need assistance with. Please repost a photo so I can be of service.

      Thank you,
      Josh

      1. kouvang vang Avatar
        kouvang vang

        How do u post a picture

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You can post photos of your coins here by clicking the rectangular image icon near the comment box, which gives you access to your image files stored on the device you’re using to post comments. You can post jpg or png files up to about 2 mb in size.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi,

      Your 1990 quarter exhibits heavy rim dings and displaced metal from post-mint damage. This piece is worth its face value and is safe to spend if you wish.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

Leave a Comment

Content Widget