Start Here

Values

Buying & Selling

Rare U.S. Coins

How To's

Myths & History

Have A Quarter Without Ridges? Broadstrike Error Quarter Values

by Joshua McMorrow-Hernandez

Ezoic/Google Ad Code Here

Quarters without ridges (or edge reeding) turn up in pocket change from time to time. Most are worth keeping.

Of course, these odd coins catch people’s attention because U.S. quarters are supposed to have reeded edges.

Which leads to a lot of coin collecting questions:

  • Are quarters without ridges actually error coins?
  • If smooth edge quarters are mint errors, then how much are they worth?
  • Are some quarters without reeded edges simply damaged coins?
  • If so, then how can you tell damaged quarters apart from error quarters?

Error Quarters vs. Damaged Quarters With Smooth Edges

Let’s talk about how a regular quarter might end up without ridges — there are basically 2 ways this could happen:

  1. The coin was heavily worn on its edges — most likely due to extensive use in vending machines, casino slot machines, or the like. The edges may have also been intentionally removed with a filing device after the coin left the mint. These are not errors and are not valuable.
  2. The coin wasn’t struck in its collar die or retaining collar — which would stamp the reeds onto the edge of the quarter. This is called a broadstrike or broadstruck error. These are errors and are valuable.

If you’re like me and you’ve been searching through coin rolls and coin jars for over 3 decades, you’ve probably found dozens of these smooth-edge quarters. Before you get too excited, you need to be aware of the “dryer coin” issue. When a quarter gets trapped inside the spinning metal drum of a commercial clothes dryer, the constant tumbling physically rolls the edges smooth. The dead giveaway is the rim — if the edge is smooth but the outer rim looks unusually fat, tall, and rolled inward like a tiny donut, you didn’t find an error. You found a coin that spent too much time doing laundry, and it’s only worth face value.

Next, you need to determine if your quarter without ridges is a broadstruck quarter (error coin) or a regular quarter (damaged coin)…

How To Tell If A Smooth Edge Quarter Is A Broadstrike Error Coin

Broadstruck coins do have smooth edges, but there’s something else about them that makes them quite distinctive: they’re wider and flatter than ordinary.

If the retaining collar isn’t surrounding a planchet (the blank disc of coin metal) when it’s being struck, then it will become somewhat wider and thinner than it should be.

So, a broadstrike error quarter will:

  • Be wider than normal and thinner than ordinary, and it won’t be the typical diameter or thickness of other quarters with ridges
  • Have a narrow margin of blank metal surrounding the periphery of the coin where the rim would normally be
  • Possibly have weaker design details on either side of the coin because the metal spreads out farther than it normally should

If your smooth edge quarter appears normal in every other way (it’s the right thickness and the correct diameter) then it’s not an error coin — it is merely exhibiting extensive edge wear, is damaged, or has been altered.

Don’t just rely on your eyes to guess if a coin looks a little bit wider or thinner. Grab your digital pocket scale and weigh it! A genuine broadstrike error quarter completely skipped the steel retaining collar when the coining press hammered down (meaning the metal pancake-splattered outward). But because it came from a standard U.S. Mint planchet, its weight should be completely authentic. Drop it on the scale: a post-1964 copper-nickel clad broadstrike must still weigh right around its standard 5.67 grams, while a pre-1965 silver survivor needs to weigh in near 6.25 grams. If someone ground the ridges off in their garage with a file, the coin won’t weigh enough because they literally shaved off the metal!

How Much Is A Quarter Without Ridges Worth?

Finally, the most important question!

I’m guessing you came here to find out how much your smooth edge quarter dollar coins are worth.

So here’s the scoop:

Smooth Edge Quarter Value (Damaged Coin, Not An Error Coin)

  • Washington Quarters Made Before 1965 — silver melt value 
  • Washington Quarters Produced After 1964 — 25 cents

Broadstruck Quarter Value (Error Coin)

  • Washington Quarters Struck Before 1965 — $125+
  • Washington Quarters Made After 1964 — $20+
  • Bicentennial Quarters — $30+

The biggest money lies in an “Uncentered Broadstrike” — an error where the coin skips the collar and shifts off-center, leaving a blank, crescent-shaped edge. A crisp, uncirculated modern clad error with a full, readable date easily brings $50 to $150+ at auction.

Have you been lucky enough to pull a genuine 90% silver broadstrike quarter straight out of a standard bank paper wrapper?

Drop a line in the comments below and let me know what you’ve found!

PUBLISHED July 6, 2026
UPDATED July 20, 2026

Joshua McMorrow-Hernandez

Numismatic Specialist

Hi, I’m Josh! I’m the Editor here at the US Coins Guide. My love for coins began when I was 11 years old. I primarily collect and study U.S. coins produced during the 20th century.

I’m a member of the American Numismatic Association (ANA) and the Numismatic Literary Guild (NLG). I have won multiple awards from the NLG for my work as a coin journalist. I’m also the editor at the Florida United Numismatists Club (FUN Topics magazine), and author of Images of America: The United States Mint in Philadelphia (a book that explores the colorful history of the Philadelphia Mint). I’ve contributed hundreds of articles for various coin publications including COINage, The Numismatist, Numismatic News, Coin Dealer Newsletter, Coin Values, and CoinWeek.

I’ve authored over 1,000 articles here at the US Coins Guide (many with over 50K shares).

I welcome your coin questions!

84 responses to “Have A Quarter Without Ridges? Broadstrike Error Quarter Values”

  1. Angela Marie Sutton Avatar
    Angela Marie Sutton

    I have a Bicentennial Broadstruck quarter with no mint mark. The whole word LIBERTY is cut off at the top too. The L looks longer at the bottom than a normal Bicentennial Quarter and it doesn’t seem like the same kind of metal either. I haven’t found any other posts or pages with one like it. Do you think it’s worth something and who should I take it to to appraise it? Thank you.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Angela —

      Thank you for the description of the coin… Would you mind posting clear photos of the front and back here? I’m sure if I see it I could tell you exactly what you have and also offer an opinion on its value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Travis Hardesty Avatar
        Travis Hardesty

        I have a quarter with smooth edges and it also is smooth on the face side of it. Its a 2006 Nebraska quarter

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Travis —

          Unfortunately, the coin shows heavy post-mint damage. It appears someone tried sanding it, obliterating some of the high details, etc. This quarter is worth its face value.

          Best,
          Josh

  2. Teresa Y Alick Avatar
    Teresa Y Alick

    I am very new to coin collecting. I found a 2007 p montana quarter without ribbing the head side of the coin. The edge looks beveled. Is this considered broad struck? It weighs 5.6gr

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Teresa —

      I’d need to please see a couple clear photos of your coin to assist further but based on how you say the edge is beveled it sounds like post-mint damage to me.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Debra —

      Unfortunately this isn’t a broadstrike error but rather a coin whose edges were altered post-mint either by being spun in a dryer or by having its edges machined in a process known as “spooning.” We explain more about these types of this in this article: https://uscoinsguide.com/error-coins/

      Because this coin is effectively damaged and its metal content value does not exceed face value, it is worth 25 cents.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Brian —

      What you have here is a post-mint altered quarter; it appears to have been machined in a manner known as spooning, in which the edges are upraised with a blunt implement. Because it is not an error, was altered, is worn, and has no precious-metal content it is worth face value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

  3. Nicholas Thomas Avatar
    Nicholas Thomas

    not the right picture sorry

    1. Nicholas Thomas Avatar
      Nicholas Thomas

      any ideas on this quarter 5.74 grams wider then a regular quarter as well

    2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Nicholas —

      The weight is within tolerances and this piece appears to have some moderate surface damage; there appears to be some particularly heavy damage on the rim under Washington’s ponytail and above the “L” of “LIBERTY.” This could contribute to the coin being slightly wider upon measurement.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Nicholas Thomas Avatar
        Nicholas Thomas

        this wasnt the right quarter

      2. Nicholas Thomas Avatar
        Nicholas Thomas

        the picture i just posted is the one i was meaning to post

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Nicholas —

          The 1987(?) quarter you posted is heavily damaged and pitted, and that is all from post-Mint alterations. It is worth face value.

          Best,
          Josh

  4. Paige Carlson Avatar

    is this coin worth anything?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Paige —

      If you posted photos of your coin I’m afraid I’m not seeing them here. Would you please repost them so I can be of better help?

      Thank you,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Mark —

      While there’s some minor doubling on this coin it’s unfortunately only mechanical doubling, which is rather common and derives not from a doubled die but rather issues with the die deteriorating or shifting on the presses perhaps due to overuse. There is generally no premium associated with such pieces.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jon —

      This 1993-D quarter is what many call a dryer coin, which is worth face value and is covered in better detail here: https://uscoinsguide.com/coin-rim-errors/

      All my best,
      Josh

  5. Brenda Arnold Avatar
    Brenda Arnold

    I have a quarter that is smooth around the edges. I put it under a coin microscope is what I am going to call it and I can see that the edges of the coin were bearly marked. When you look at the coin with the naked eye it looks perfectly smooth. Also, on the back of the coin the duck is missing its eye, some of the trees do not have the leaves, and the boat and the man were not stamped as they should have been. . The quarter is a 2005 State of Minnesota coin.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Brenda —

      It’s hard for me to say for certain what is going on with your coin without seeing it. Could you please post a couple clear images of the coin here and I’d be glad to help further.

      Thank you,
      Josh

      1. Brenda Arnold Avatar
        Brenda Arnold

        Will you tell me how to upload pictures, please.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Brenda —

          You can upload photos here by clicking the little rectangular photo upload button near the comment field. From there you will be able to select the images you wish to upload; they should be less than 2mb in size and either JPG or PNG files.

          Hope this helps,
          Josh

          1. Brenda Arnold Avatar
            Brenda Arnold

            Thank you. I will tonight when I get home.

  6. Brenda Arnold Avatar
    Brenda Arnold

    This is Brenda, do you have an email address you can share. I took pictures and I can’t seem to figure out how to upload them here.

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Brenda —

      I answer all TheFunTimesGuide coins questions through here on this forum and hope this detailed link about how to upload images on Disqus helps! Here it is: https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717234-adding-images-and-videos

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Brenda Arnold Avatar
        Brenda Arnold

        Also, the front of the quarter has raised edges that you can feel. The back of the quarter is not raised as much.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Brenda —

          Thank you for posting those images… Unfortunately this quarter is showing post-mint damage to the edge. I can tell because had the quarter NOT been struck inside the retaining collar (which gives the coin its reeded edge — the grooves on the edge) the rim would not have been formed as it is and the quarter would’ve also been flatter and a bit wider than normal — that would’ve been a type of error called a broadstrike.

          Somebody took a file or another tool to the edge of the coin and wore down the reeds. This piece is worth its face value and is safe to spend if you wish.

          I appreciate your taking the time to reach out and also for posting the images so I could make a decisive conclusion as to what is going on with your interesting coin!

          All my best,
          Josh

          1. Brenda Arnold Avatar
            Brenda Arnold

            What are the errors on the back of the coin, duck, leaves, boat, why are they missing things?

          2. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
            JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

            Hi, Brenda —

            While the basic design elements are all there (the duck, the ripples of water around it, the boat, the trees, state outline, etc.), they are showing signs of moderate to heavy wear that have largely eliminated the details from those items. It almost appears someone took a sanding block and lightly rubbed it against the coin… Notice the heavy lines/striations.

            Best,
            Josh

      2. Brenda Arnold Avatar
        Brenda Arnold

        I posted the pictures

  7. Sean Kish Avatar
    Sean Kish

    Hello Joshua.
    My wife found a 1990 quarter with no eagle struck on the back. Been trying to find a similar find online to get an idea of what it could be worth.
    Any info/help would be appreciated. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8cfe1223cfffd8c3e2f4e5db53f606cddf1ce47c89f918b40fc6779b8d826842.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8d6a5237d35a15f7846fa390660ae872dfef5f2d986cb0358ee072deb7b2440b.jpg

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi Sean,

      What happened here is someone filed off the heraldic eagle design. It’s unfortunately a situation of post-mint damage and the 1990 quarter is worth its face value.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Wayne —

      I’m afraid it’s post-mint damage. The edges appear to have been smoothed and the edge forced upward by way of applied pressure. It’s safe to spend at face value if you wish.

      Thanks for reaching out,
      Josh

      1. Joshua Robert Strong Avatar
        Joshua Robert Strong

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b9e6b66c85322c25aab0ac4065f138cbf55595db1059dedc3745bda693c49ec5.jpg . Hello sir. I have a 1944 d. It has some interesting errors. Can you please tell me we’re the the result of the mint or someone done this. And the value if possible. Thanks.
        Joshua Strong

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Joshua —

          I’ll be responding here to the three posts on this coin; unfortunately, this 1944-D Lincoln penny does not have any errors but rather has sustained some heavy post-mint damage. It’s worth its copper value of about 2 to 3 cents.

          Thank you for reaching out,
          Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Paula —

      Unfortunately, this is not a mint error. This quarter exhibits post-mint damage either by way of alteration by centrifugal force, such as spinning inside of a clothes dryer, or by applied manipulation, as in scooping or “spooning” the edge of a coin with a blunt object.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Paula Jean Frisch Avatar
        Paula Jean Frisch

        I can see where something has wore the 2006 quater and its rim and face appears to be worn but the 1996 quater is clearly stamped with no signs of alterations and its rim is smooth metal Allyson clearly separated where as the 2006 rim look like teeth between alloys

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Paula —

          I’ll need to please see a clear photo or two of your coin to assist more thoroughly. You can post the photo(s) here.

          Thank you,
          Josh

  8. Paula Jean Frisch Avatar
    Paula Jean Frisch

    Joshua I have two quaters with no rim one the two metal alloys are smooth and the other quater witH no rim has a smooth line separating the alloys.. Could one of them be correct?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Liz —

      This quarter has either been manipulated with a blunt object to push the edge and rim in (in a process known as “spooning”) or it is a so-called “dryer coin” that spun around inside a clothes dryer or other type of basin; centrifugal force pushed the edge inward and upward around the coin. In either case, it is an altered coin and unfortunately not an error.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

      1. liz Avatar
        liz

        Thank you. I thought it looked smashed but I couldn’t figure out how somebody got that smooth copper colored band around it.

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          You’re welcome! Yes, that coin is definitely a looker, that’s for sure!

  9. Jason Wolfkill Avatar
    Jason Wolfkill

    I just found a 2000 New Hampshire state quarter with smooth edge how much is it worth it’s definitely a error coin not damaged

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Jason —

      While it may be a so-called dryer coin (manipulated by way of centrifugal force in a clothes dryer or the like), it was most likely intentionally altered through a process known as spooning, in which the edge of the coin is pushed inward with a blunt object and machined smoothed. There is no numismatic premium for a coin like this, though some collect these pieces as novelties.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Antoinette —

      The smooth edge of this quarter is post-mint damage caused by either intentional alteration or having spun at high speeds in a clothes dryer. Here’s more info on coins like these: https://uscoinsguide.com/quarter-without-ridges-value/

      Best,
      Josh

  10. Cassi Schaaf Avatar
    Cassi Schaaf

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/346a6c05b89437690afb05b6bb7cd92da2ed2d06a535107841e82e5e3c976b7a.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fed7e133c989f470c95a579825e6a2fbb125ce9aafca098657658852a432b0fa.jpg Hi, I found this Mt Rushmore quarter and Im wondering if it’s an error or not? I have found couple pictures online of identical ones…any help please? Thank you

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Cassi —

      Unfortunately this is not an error but rather a case of post-mint damage. Someone beveled the edge of this quarter with some type of sanding or grinding device. While there is no way this coin would’ve come from the mint like this, it nevertheless is quite a looker!

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Peggy —

      Given the rim (the raised lip) around the edge of the coin is fully struck, there is no possible way the edge of the coin could’ve left the mint with this smooth edge. The edge of the coin automatically receives ridges when the rim is formed. Therefore this coin was definitely altered after it left the mint, most likely by way of sanding the edges down. It does not appear the edges were smoothed down by way of centrifugal force such as in a clothes dryer — a common scenario, but one that also tends to bunch the rim of the coin closer to the inside of the coin’s design; your coin appears of otherwise normal diameter.

      In all, this coin being altered unfortunately has no additional collector value. It is safe to spend if you wish.

      Thank you for reaching out,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Tim —

      Believe it or not, your quarter was indeed not struck that way — the raised rim on your coin indicates it would be mechanically impossible, given the minting process.

      How? Because the rim is formed by something called a retaining collar, which is a device that fits around the blank as it’s being struck and simultaneously imparts the edge reeds (the edge grooves or lines) as the coin is receiving its design.

      Could the retaining collar have not deployed? Yes, but then the rim would not have formed and the coin would have been flatter and wider than normal — resulting as a broad strike error, which this is not.

      Ultimately, this piece has the hallmarks of being a post-mint alteration of some kind. It’s either seen an intentional shaving of the edge (because some people do things like that to coins); a smooth edge like this is also a common result of centrifugal forces that occur inside a clothes dryer as the coin spins about within the machine on its edge — this, too, is surprisingly common.

      At any rate, this is not a mint error.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Charlie Pifer Avatar
        Charlie Pifer

        Have a 1965 smooth edged quarter its weight is 5.4 grams new at this not sure how to ask things or get pics added on for someone to see if this is an error coin any help would be greatly appreciated

        1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
          JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

          Hi, Charlie —

          You can post a photo of your coin here in the comments forum by clicking the little rectangular photo icon (the box with the little mountain in it) on the bottom left side of the comment box. Images should be jpg or png, high resolution, and less than 2 mb.

          Best,
          Josh

  11. BOSET16 Avatar
    BOSET16

    I have a 1994 p quarter with no reeds and a very rounded edge. It seems to measure less than the standard diameter. Is this an error or has someone altered this coin?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi,

      I don’t see the front or back of the coin to confirm, but based on the edge image you sent me, it appears your 1994-P quarter was what some might call “spooned” — the edges were manipulated with a blunt object inward and upward. This results in a narrower quarter with a lipped rim and a smooth edge. Such a piece, while a curiosity, is not a mint error and is worth its face value.

      Best,
      Josh

      1. BOSET16 Avatar
        BOSET16

        Thanks.

  12. Scorp Skull (Erik Nielsen) Avatar
    Scorp Skull (Erik Nielsen)

    Is it possible for only half of the thickness of the quarter to receive the reeding around the coin?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Erik —

      While it’s certainly possible that only a portion of the reeding would be applied to the quarter due to a collar issue, it’s more likely that circulation wear would have obliterated the reeding from only a portion of the edge. A clear photo or two of the coin posted here in the comments section could help determine what may be going on with your coin.

      Best,
      Josh

  13. Rachel Barrios Avatar
    Rachel Barrios

    Hi I won a quarter in a poker game it’s double thick and it has no ridges. it looks kind of like the date says 2025 it has a 1 and a 2 stamped in the tens column. I don’t know if it’s an error coin or not how can I figure it out

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Rachel —

      Please post a few clear images of your piece here in the comments forum and I’ll be happy to try and help identify what you have.

      Thank you,
      Josh

      1. Danielle S. Avatar
        Danielle S.

        Hi my name is Danielle I’m new hear ,I have a question on my quarter ,not sure if its. Broadstrike

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Lavern —

      I see two things happening with this quarter. Neither, unfortunately, is an error.

      The first thing I’ll point out is the apparent bubbling, which was most likely caused by the coin being exposed to extreme heat — perhaps a fire. This can cause the clad layers to warp and begin peeling off the coin’s copper core.

      The next thing I’ll showcase is the coin’s edge reeding, which appears to have been worn off. This is not unusual especially on quarters, which tend to receive more edge wear than other coins due to their frequent use in vending machines. The edge may also have been smoothed out due to a type of wear phenomenon that can occur in clothes dryers and other mechanisms caused by centrifugal force that wears down the edge of the coin.

      At any rate, this is not an error coin, and it’s ultimately worth its face value.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

      1. Lavern Blackwell Avatar
        Lavern Blackwell

        Thank you!

  14. Cathy C Avatar
    Cathy C

    I have a 195 P dime. That is brownish copper. The whole coin. The weight is right what is this?

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Cathy,

      Can you please post a clear photo of your coin here in the comments section so I can take a look at what is going on?

      Thank you,
      Josh

    1. JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide Avatar
      JoshuaTheFunTimesGuide

      Hi, Noah —

      The circular groove around the inside of the face (obverse) of the coin is post-mint damage likely caused by either a coin counting machine or vending machine. Otherwise this is a normal 1967 Washington quarter that is worth its face value in worn condition as this one is here.

      Best wishes,
      Josh

Leave a Comment

Ezoic/Google Ad

300x250

Content Widget

Ezoic/Google Ad

300x600 Sticky